Curriculum & Teacher Support Committee Meeting Minutes Archive

 

Barre Town Curriculum and Teacher Support Committee Meeting Notes
December 7, 2011

Present:
Brenda Buzzell, Chairperson
Elaine F. Laine, Ph.D., Director of Curriculum
Kim Canavan, Community Member/Parent
Jen Nye, Principal
Ry Hoffman, Counselor
Barb Shipman, Teacher of Spanish
Tanya Crawford-Stempel, School Nurse
Sarah Child, Parent
Beth Hulbert, Math Specialist
Pat Nally, Literacy Specialist
Susan Barnard, PE Teacher
Julia Pritchard, Director of Special Education
Tim Crowley, Principal

The meeting was called to order at 8:03 AM.

I. Spanish Proposal for High School Credit
Dr. Laine distributed the draft proposal that was the focus of the November 11 inservice for the Spanish I teachers, as both Barre City and Barre Town are interested in moving this proposal forward. Barb Shipman presented the proposal and addressed the high points. Curriculum is aligned and culture will be addressed. Assessment practices will be shared among the teachers and will be discussed among the teachers. On an ideal level, Spanish should be offered every day but that is not realistic. Ms. Shipman shared discussions between the high school and middle school teachers so that there was a basic understanding of the middle school learners. Caution was made not to place students in level one, if they should go into level 2.Ms. Shipman was commended for seeing this program through. This will prove beneficial for students as credit will be on their transcripts.

II. Math Intervention
Ms. Hulbert addressed the entire intervention/enrichment block at the middle school. She distributed a document that outlined the program at grades 5-6 and 7-8. The Math lab runs in a quarterly block and the enrichment runs across a semester timeframe. Fractions continue to be difficult to students. Students are identified from their quarterly assessment data and assigned accordingly. The math lab is concept-based and is implemented at an intentional level using data and performance assessment, focused on a narrow concept.

For Special Education, each educator is assigned to focus on literacy and math. Students can be
divided, on a needs basis; consequently, this becomes a stronger service for the students. Challenges
arise when students are delayed in both literacy and math. The special educators are in the regular classroom
with their students and then can work with the students in smaller groups. This model provides a direct connection and
alignment between the classroom and special needs classes.

The enrichment block was designed for other students as well and this has not yet been attained. The upper end of the
enrichment block needs to have more rigor infused into it for those who excel.

III. Literacy Block and Strategic Phonics Program and Assessment
Mr. Nally addressed the K-2 literacy program that uses a three block framework of literacy instruction as designed and created by Fountas and Pinnell. The three blocks are Reading Workshop, Writing Workshop, and Word Study. This is a balanced literacy approach integrating both phonics and the whole text. Fountas and Pinnell have been brought into the K-2 program as it is very comprehensive and clear about the principle being taught. The challenge of the overall literacy program is time so the salient parts are being addressed. Spelling and a review of the program were the missing aspects of the program. During the fall, the Scope and Sequence was reviewed. As a result of the review, there are now directives as to what specifically has to be taught and what could be combined. Anchor and high frequency words are listed on the Grade 1 Spelling List. There is a month by month planning guide that teachers must follow. In the past, the last third of the program was not taught at grade one. Teachers have had much training with the F and P approach.

Regular and special educators have been trained together and have met together during the inservices during this
school year. Strength of the program is in the guided reading and the read alouds. When using these concepts,
teachers can provide more purposeful instruction. The read alouds use text talk and vocabulary building to match the
research.

IV. Health Education Curriculum and Teacher Position

Ms. Crawford-Stempel presented the rationale to hire a new K-4 health educator for the 2012-2013 school year. She highlighted areas such as tobacco, alcohol and other drug prevention, bullying and harassment prevention. Additionally, suicide prevention and child sexual abuse prevention are now required. Some teachers are not comfortable facilitating discussions about the curriculum. The skills would be developed as students progressed through their developmental stages. Ms. Nye stated that a health educator would slide into the computer position which will be integrated into the curriculum. The schedule could be restructured for a quarter system so that all would participate. Discussion ensued about having enough time for this new position so that literacy and math time would not be reduced. The health curriculum does address math and literacy. Health education does not need to be isolated from the curriculum. This position would teach a class for 40 minutes once a week. In the past, Barre Town tried to do the integrated approach, by the regular education teachers but the sustainability was very difficult. Teachers do not have enough time to do what they are to do now.

Last year, the curriculum was given to the teachers without any training. YRBS (Youth Risk Behavior Survey) data showed that the students are suffering. Ms. Barnard stated that good health is essential and a part time health educator would assist Barre Town students tremendously. The risk behaviors are not being addressed at school and more needs to be provided for the students.

Health education is to prevent the risky behaviors. There is a serious concern that time from the core will be taken away. Students receive 6 specials a week. The special time is when core teachers have time to meet and to collaborate and to address student needs.

Technology must be integrated into the curriculum and it will not take time from the core. The 5 -8 program has already changed and now the K-4 health education program needs to be addressed. Healthier kids will learn better and score better on the NECAP. This will be addressed at the board level.

V. NAEP Scores
Dr. Laine distributed a document on the National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP) for the committee members to review. It outlined the scores from 2003 – 2011 as well as addressing Vermont’s high ranking (#2 in the nation for Grade 8 math) and for reading, Vermont shared the number one ranking for grade 8 with eight other states. Vermont is above the nation for both grades 4 and 8 in both reading and Mathematics, although we have made no substantial gains since the 2009 NAEP. Less than 50% of children are proficient in math and reading.

VI. Data Driven School Improvement Strategies (tabled for January 4, 2012)

The meeting was adjourned at 9:34 AM.

Respectfully submitted,

Elaine F. Laine, Ph.D.
Director of Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment

 

Barre Town Curriculum and Teacher Support Committee Meeting Notes
November 2, 2011

Present:
Brenda Buzzell, Chairperson
Elaine F. Laine, Ph.D., Director of Curriculum
Kim Canavan, Community Member/Parent
Jen Nye, Principal
Tim Crowley, Principal
Ry Hoffman, Counselor
Barb Shipman, Teacher of Spanish
Sarah Chap, Teacher of Health, Family and Consumer Science

The meeting was called to order at 8:05 AM.

  1. Spanish Proposal for High School Credit

Barb Shipman gave an overview of the Spanish I high school credit proposal. She addressed the time frame to accomplish the Spanish I curriculum. Ms. Shipman feels the students in grade 7 are on their way to completing the curriculum for Spanish I during their 8th grade year. Consequently, the new program should start next year. Last year, thirteen students went into Spanish II. The same textbook used across the district for Spanish I. Using common assessments will be addressed with the other Spanish I teachers. We are on track to begin this next year. Dr. Laine stated that the focus of the November 11 inservice for the Spanish I teachers is to finish the proposal as both Barre City and Barre Town are interested in moving this proposal forward. During the two January inservices, January 2 and 16, the curriculum for the new course will be finalized for school board approval for spring 2012.

  1. Internet Safety: Sarah Chap

Ms. Chap distributed a document addressing Internet Safety that she will be teaching in her grades 5-8 classes. She addressed the three Internet Safety topics with the committee: 1) Safety and Security, 2) Digital Citizenship/Manners, Bullying and Ethics, and 3) Research and Information Literacy. Mike Wetherall, teacher of Technology Education addresses some Safety and Security units in grade 6 and the Digital Citizenship topic in grade 7.

The Technicool Program is from Vermont Prevent Child Abuse and is a new program which she will teach in grades 7 and 8. Ms. Chap ensures that there is a balanced and general message sent to the students and that is appropriate use of the internet. She uses positive language that is “age appropriate” with the students instead of the negative type of language. She also sends a letter to parents to address the units as some of the areas could be of a sensitive nature. Should a parent not be comfortable with the contents of the unit, they contact Ms. Chap and other plans are made for the student.

 Additionally, Ms. Chap shared the 3 top research-based curricula with the committee and will share them with the parents as well.

Research and Information Literacy: Librarians should intentionally emphasize citing references. This is an emerging curriculum that needs to be emphasized. Language Arts teachers are teaching this and the expectation that it should be across the curriculum will be communicated to the staff.

Ms. Chap would like to have an Internet Safety Team as a school wide initiative and one that is continued and sustained over the years throughout the curriculum. Mr. Crowley complimented Ms. Chap as a caring teacher who communicates with her students’ parents. In her classroom, students are engaged and students trust her approach and what she says.

  1. Social Studies Curriculum Writing

    Dr. Laine addressed the miscommunication that took place last year about expectations for the 5th grade curriculum for this year. She and Ms. Karen Heath will meet with the 5th grade teachers during the November 11 inservice to address next steps for the group.

    On Nov. 11, teachers of grades 6, 7, and 8 social studies will work on curriculum with Victoria Hughes from the Vermont History Museum. On November14, Dr. Laine will meet with same group to outline the dates and plan the unit writing for this year.

    Next fall, Dr. Laine will coordinate the integration of language arts and social studies in grades 7 – 10. This spring the ELA district committee will align the curriculum with the Common Core and next fall the two disciplines, ELA and Social Studies will design integrated
    units.

    Mr. Crowley is concerned with the lack of emphasis on the importance of literacy with social studies. VALLI gave excellent tools for literacy and higher writing standards. We do not assess Social Studies, as we do with literacy and mathematics, but we could write local assessments for that purpose using NECAP type questions. Local assessment for SS should be addressed with the district curriculum committee. Assessment needs to inform instruction. Integrating the NECAP type questions with SS content would inform us if our curriculum expectations were being met.
     

  2. November 11 Inservice Plan

Dr. Laine noted that the K-8 inservice is framed by the three cluster groups, K-2, 3-5, and 6–8. The major change, with the upcoming November 11 inservice, is that professional development integrating technology into the curriculum will be offered on three different levels. Level I will be for the beginner using Promethean Boards, Level II addresses Open Office and File Compatibility, and Level III will address the TPCK model which stands for Technology, Pedagogy, Content, and Knowledge. Pam Campbell will be the instructor for that particular hour workshop. Teachers will register on line via the November 11 inservice brochure where there is a link embedded in the program.

Dr. Laine stated that a Report Card Committee will be created at the district level and it will be framed by the three cluster groups, as noted above in the inservice brochure. There are currently 16 different report cards used between Barre City and Barre Town. The goal is to standardize and simplify the progress reports so that both schools would use the same report card for grades K-2, 3-5, and 6 – 8. In reviewing some of the report cards, Dr. Laine noted that there were both letter and standards-based grading was used but that there were incongruencies between the letter grade and the standards-based numbers assigned.
The committee recommended that the report card be easy to read and understand and that letter grades would be better. Parents need to have the tools that are understandable so that they can help in the education process with their child. A checklist was also recommended.
Power School is open for the upper grades and she will check to see if it can be open at the
lower grades as well.

Next time: NAEP Scores
The meeting was adjourned at 9:28 AM.

Respectfully submitted,

Elaine F. Laine, Ph.D.
Director of Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment

 


Barre Town Curriculum and Teacher Support Committee Meeting Notes
Barre Town Middle and Elementary School
Wednesday, October 5, 2011

Present:
Brenda Buzzell, Chairperson
Elaine F. Laine, Ph.D., Director of Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment
Ry Hoffman, Guidance Counselor
Beth Hulbert, Math Specialist
Kim Canavan, Community Member/Parent
Sarah Child, Community Member/Parent
Jen Nye, Principal
Tim Crowley, Principal
Julia Pritchard, Director of Special Education
Pat Nally, Literacy Specialist
Mike Dickinson, IT Director
Don McMahon, Director of Special Services
Amy Morrell, Teacher, Room 284

The meeting was called to order at 8:00 AM by the Chairperson, Brenda Buzzell.

I. Special Education Service Delivery: Room 284
Julia Pritchard gave the historical perspective and overview of the need to support those with significant needs that were not being successful in other programs. Amy Morrell, teacher of the special needs program in room 284, distributed her handbook and described her program. There are students from grades 4 – 8 (5 students last year and 9 this year) in the program. She has the assistance of 2.5 paraeducators.

In this program students earn points in four areas: participation, community, academics, and social thinking. Ms. Morrell explained that her program is structured and has boundaries and expectations. She tries to align her program with the regular education program as much as possible. Students are transitioning back, albeit slowly, into the regular education environment but they do attend regular specials classes, TA and lunch with their peers. Confidence building and a structured environment appear to be the keys to having Room 284 to be a successful program. The environment is proactive and flexible which addresses these students’ needs. Ms. Morrell’s skill set has made this program a success.

By placing the special needs students into an environment that works for them also allows the regular classroom student to access his/her education as well. This program is an example of using less resources and being more beneficial for the students without needing to place them at an off-site school. Every child can learn; we must find the way.

II. Common Core/Smarter Balance Assessment Consortium (SBAC)
Dr. Laine gave an overview of the CC and SBAC addressing the following:

  1. Two documents are available: Transitioning to the Common core State Standards: ELA and Math
  2. SBAC will replace the NECAP (Spring 2015) SBAC = Smarter Balance Assessment Consortium
  3. SBAC Literacy will assess listening, speaking, reading and writing.
  4. Some assessments will be done online.
  5. Mathematics: Fewer standards, yet they must be taught at a greater depth (especially grades 5-8)
  6. Highlights: Performance tasks for Creativity, Critical Thinking, and Collaboration; 80% of writing must be persuasive or explain, using evidence, and 80% of readings must be nonfiction by middle school grades

Mr. Nally distributed a document addressing the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) that placed emphasis on:

  1. Higher order/complex thinking,
  2. Text complexity,
  3. Vocabulary (huge emphasis on vocabulary)
  4. Grammar,
  5. Technology,
  6. Comparing two or more different types/genres of text or other forms of media.

Andrea McLaughlin worked on the Vermont CCSS transition document and Beth Hulbert has been heavily involved nationally with the Common Core and is on the state transition committee that authored the VT Transition Documents in mathematics.

Ms. Hulbert explained that the math staff development plan is in place to address the CCSS and it is a part of the Barre Town Restructuring Plan. The students in Kindergarten this year will be the first ones to take the SBAC as third graders so we are transitioning this year to a more closely aligned CCSS curriculum. Next year, Ms. Hulbert will work intensively with the first and second grade teachers. Ms. Hulbert spoke extensively about a course that she is creating addressing algebra and arithmetic for the SU as well as her assisting with a state course. We are using the transition materials created by the publisher of our elementary program (Bridges) and there is no need to buy new materials, at this time, or in the near future.

III. New Spanish Program (for high school credit)
Discussion addressed the following points:

  1. The amount of time that students spend in grades 5 - 8 in their Spanish classes should be sufficient so that they can test into Spanish II.
  2. If that is the case, Dr. Laine recommends that we change the curriculum so that students could take the unit tests and the final exam.
  3. The goal of everyone's taking the final would be for them to move into Spanish II with an elective credit given on their transcript.

Discussion will continue at next month’s meeting.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:32 AM.

Respectfully submitted,

Elaine F. Laine, Ph.D., Director of Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment


 

 

Barre Town Curriculum and Teacher Support Committee Meeting Notes
September 7, 2011

 

Present:
Brenda Buzzell, Chairperson
Elaine F. Laine, Ph.D., Director of Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment
Ry Hoffman, Guidance Counselor
Karen Heath, Literacy Specialist
Beth Hulbert, Math Specialist
Kim Canavan, Community Member/Parent
Jen Nye, Principal
Carly Humke, Guidance Intern


The meeting was called to order at 8:01 AM.

  1. Introduction of New Director of Curriculum and Committee members
    Dr. Laine and Jen Nye made introductory remarks.

     

  2. Writing Program Update
    Karen gave an update from last spring when a representative from the Collins Writing program spoke to a group of teachers. Teachers were quite happy with the presentation. It provides a common language from K-12. Training needed 4 staff development days but was not possible and it was costly ($30,000). BSU will create their own framework. An additional document was shared with the group addressing the program.

    Students should be actively engaged in the writing process and think about it.
    There are four types of writing: 1) Brainstorming, (not graded), 2) Content involved and connected to what was taught. Type 2 writing is done in math as well. 3) Evaluative writing with focused areas for correction areas are chosen.4) Publishable writing.
    1) Tom Sedore wishes to do Type I and II training with grades 6 -12.
    2) K – 5: Karen will purchase posters with the “thinking” words for classrooms
    3) VALLI (VT Adolescent Language and Literacy Initiative): Reading and vocabulary across the curriculum (This was a 3 year program with a consultant but now teachers meet after school without a consultant.)
    4) This year we are focusing on Writing Across the Curriculum
    5) Training will be done during the VALLI meetings after school.
    6) Art teacher addresses literacy through art and the Spanish teacher addresses literacy.
    7) All teachers are expected to participate in the after school meetings.
    8) Young Writers’ Project: Online Classroom
    1) A meeting was held recently with Mr. Geoff Gevalt and Darcy, his assistant, Mike Dickinson, Karen Heath and Elaine Laine.
    2) 18 teachers are interested (Grades 5 -8).
    3) The 4th grade may be involved.
    Discussion ensued and the consensus of the committee was that any writing or other student product that is placed out for the public to see must be Type 4. Spelling and punctuation must be correct. Portfolios will be kept to assess student progress.

     

  3. NECAP Math Data
    The 7th grade males (last year) had flat scores. (It is a very needy class.)
    2 years ago, there were 6th grade math curriculum issues. The Barre Town class was behind Barre City on content coverage due to multiplication facts drill work and changes were made to correct the issues. An intervention system was put into place for the struggling class. Teachers constantly regrouped this class and there was a heavy focus on enrichment.

    Making connections with the real world builds interest early on. Math has a homework component to address that as well such as when to use fractions.

    These connections should be done K-12. Last year, there was a big change, overall. We are hopeful that students will be more successful, as a result.

    The math lab concept was put into place and students stay in it for 8 weeks. This model was replicated from Barre City. This year, the 5th grade math assessment is the best in 3 years! (Multiplicative Reasoning)

    Nanette Seago from The National Geometry Project would like to pilot training materials in Barre. Ratio and proportion and visual models with geometry are the major areas. Julie (from DOE) will be the primary instructor during our staff development days. (Grades 6 – 8). Both Barre City and Barre Town will participate.

     

  4. New Spanish Program (for high school credit)
    Barb Shipman took a group of students to prepare them for Level II Spanish last year during TA time. If students passed the high school Level I final, they could begin Spanish II upon entering high school. There was discussion on granting an elective credit for this during the June 2011, curriculum meeting. There are scheduling constraints for a separate class. It will be difficult to do this for this year, due to other specials.

    Barb asked for an advanced group of Spanish students but the master schedule would not accommodate this. Discussion needs to be articulated with the high school.
    The 5th and 6th grades meet once a week and grades 7 and 8 meet twice a week.
    There would need to be an increase in time for these courses for a high school credit to be granted. Elaine Laine will follow-up with the high school.

    The meeting was adjourned at 9:29 AM.

    Respectfully submitted,


    Elaine F. Laine, Ph.D., Director of Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment

 


Barre Town Middle/Elementary School – Curriculum Committee Meeting
Minutes of the Meeting
June 8, 2011

I. In Attendance:

  • Brenda Buzzell, Chair of the Barre Town Board and Committee Chair.
  • John Barone, Sr., Ed.D., Assistant Superintendent
  • Kim Canavan, Parent/Community Member
  • Sarah Child, Parent/Community Member
  • Tim Crowley, Co-Principal, BTMES
  • Bill Kirkland, Board Member
  • Alice Worth, Co-Principal, BTMES

II. Agenda:

  • The Collins Writing Program
  • Middle School/High School Spanish Program Proposal (Grades 7 & 8)

III. Minutes of the Meeting:

  • The meeting started at 8:05am
     
  • Information was handed out on the Collins Writing Program. On May 6, 2011, Joan Pokrant presented information on the Collins Writing Program to the K-12 English/LA Curriculum Committee and to 2 building level administrators (Tom Seodre, SHS and Michele Cote, BCEMS). The program is a K-12 approach to teaching writing across the content areas. There are schools in Vermont that have adopted the program and have seen remarkable improvement in the writing scores on state assessments (specifically on the NECAP Assessment). A summary of the program and costs associated with training and implementation of the program was shared with the committee members. The biggest strength to the program is that it is K-12, using the same instructional approach to teaching writing, common vocabulary, and a common approach to Focused Correction Areas. The members of the K-12 English/Language Arts Curriculum Committee were impressed with the presentation and are encouraging the BSU administration to move forward on this. The question will be how this happens. Once Elaine Laine officially starts (July 1, 2011, she will need to meet with BSU admin. team to decide how to move this initiative forward. The recommendation is to wait and implement this program at the start of the 2012-2013 school year and for each school to build the costs into their local budgets. This will allow the Bridging Program to finish up at BTMES, for the VALLI Program to get a start at the high school, and this will allow one more year of the Connected Math Program to complete the intensive training that is required.
     
  • A proposal is being discussed with the Spanish program at each of the middle schools and Spaulding High School. The proposal is that, starting next year, students who enter 7th grade will commit to 2 years of the study of Spanish. The students/teachers will follow the high school’s Spanish 1 curriculum and at the end of 2 years will take the high school’s Spanish 1 final exam, while also using the unit tests from Spanish 1. Based upon overall grade and final exam grade, students will not only transition into Spanish 2 as 9th graders, but, will also receive an elective credit when they enter 9th grade. There will need to be a selection process for students in the 7th grade. Those students who do not enter 7th-8th grade Spanish, will still be able to take Spanish 1 as 9th graders. This proposal will not only strengthen our middle school Spanish program but, will also allow us to offer higher level courses at the high school. The proposal will come to the school boards for approval early next year by Elaine Laine, the new K-12 Director of Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment. Ideally, each middle school should look into the possibility of offering French, in addition to Spanish, at the middle grades.
     
  • Dr. Elaine Laine is the new K-12 Director of Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment for the Barre Supervisory Union. Dr. Laine is currently the Principal at Hardwick School. She has a background in curriculum, and was a foreign language teacher. Dr. Laine and John Barone have worked out a transition plan. Dr. Laine has already spent three days in the SU transitioning with Dr. Barone. She will be back this Friday to meet to review the Consolidated Federal Grant application before it is submitted. Dr. Laine and Dr. Barone will meet in July for support with the transition and to help with the planning of the new teacher orientation days. Additionally, Alice Worth has done some transition work with Jennifer Nye, the new Principal at Barre Town Schools, to help her with the transition into her new position.
     
  • As this is my last meeting with the Barre Town Curriculum Committee, I want to express my gratitude for these last three years. It has been a pleasure and an honor to serve Barre Town Schools and the Barre Supervisory Union – John Barone, Sr., Ed.D.
     
  • The meeting was adjourned at 9:25am.

Minutes Respectfully Submitted,

John L. Barone, Sr., Ed.D.
Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
Barre Supervisory Union


 

Barre Town Middle/Elementary School – Curriculum Committee Meeting
Minutes of the Meeting
May 4, 2011

I. In Attendance:

  • Brenda Buzzell, Chair. of the Barre Town School Board and Committee Chair.
  • John Barone, Sr., Ed.D., Assistant Superintendent
  • Kim Canavan, Parent/Community Member
  • Tim Crowley, Co-Principal
  • Alice Worth, Co-Principal
  • Ry Hoffman, Guidance Counselor

II. Agenda:

  • AYP Results for Barre Town Schools
  • Upcoming School Audit (May 9th, 10th, 11th)
  • Update on full-day Staff Development on Discipline With Dignity
  • Grades 1 and 2 enrollment for 2011-2012

III. Minutes of the Meeting:

  • The meeting began at 8:15am.
     
  • John Barone shared with the Committee the results of the school’s AYP determination. Sadly to report Barre Town Middle/Elementary School did not make AYP in both Reading and Mathematics for all students, free/reduced lunch cohort, and students with disabilities. The main reason for this is the fact that the AMO (Annual Measureable Objective) increased to 468 in Reading and 463 in Mathematics. As a result, the school will enter into year 3 of Corrective Action. Specific corrective actions and restructuring requirements will be forth coming from the Vermont Department of Education (via the federal department of education). We are hoping that the up-coming Audit will make recommendations/suggestions that the school can use as part of the Restructuring Plan to address the school’s performance.
     
  • On May 9th, 10th, and 11th, Barre Town Middle/Elementary School will under-go a Performance Audit. This is being done through the Vermont Department of Education, as part of the school’s Corrective Actions. The Audit will be facilitated by three outside individuals (headed by Amy Cole). The team was selected through LAPDA – the Lamoille Area Professional Development Academy. The team will spend three days at the school interviewing teachers, staff, administration, board members; and sitting in observing classes. From there, the team will generate a report that will contain both strengths and areas of growth. It is the plan that the school’s administration will use the recommendations to re-work/amend the school’s Restructuring Plan. Tim and Alice will inform the Board (and community) about this event as part of their Principals’ Report.
     
  • On Friday, April 15th, Dr. Mendler came to Barre Town Middle/Elementary School to present on Discipline With Dignity as a follow up to the school wide reading that was happening in the school. The feed-back from the staff has been excellent. The most important message from the book and from Dr. Mendler’s presentation is that, discipline issues exist when students believe/feel that teachers/adults do not have a connection with them. Once a teacher makes the call to send a student out of the classroom, the opportunity to forge a relationship with the students has been forfeited, as well as the ownership of the relationship between the student and teacher. The issue/question that was raised is how the school’s administration will hold teachers accountable and/or work with teachers who are not using/demonstrating the strategies gleaned from both the school wide reading and the presentation. There is discussion about having Dr. Mendler come back to the school and do some follow up work.
     
  • Current enrollment:
    K is at 82
    Grade 1 at 81
    Grade 2 at 94
    Grade 3 at 100
    Grade 4 at 83
    Grade 5 at 96
    Grade 6 at 99
    Grade 7 at 77
    Grade 8 at 102

Projections for next year look as follows:

Kindergarten (2011-2012) present enrollment for August: 73 – This is a “moving target” since kindergarten enrollment is currently going on and will continue throughout the summer.
Grade 1 is currently projected for 82 by 5 teachers is 16
Grade 2 is currently projected for 81 by 5 teachers is 16
(There will only be one 2nd grade team for next year: Battistoni/Wiggins)
Grade 3 is currently projected for 94
Grade 4 is currently projected for 100

  • Our next meeting will be Wednesday, June 8, 2011 from 8:00am – 9:30am. (This meeting will be the 2nd Wednesday of the month as opposed to the 1st).

Minutes Respectfully Submitted,

John L. Barone, Sr., Ed.D.
Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
Barre Supervisory Union


 

Barre Town Middle/Elementary School – Curriculum Committee Meeting
Minutes of the Meeting
March 9, 2011

I. In Attendance:

  • Brenda Buzzell, Bair Town Board Chair., and Committee Chair.
  • John Barone, Assistant Superintendent
  • Kim Caravan, Parent/Community Member
  • Sara Child, Parent/Community Member
  • Alice Worth, Co-Principal
  • Tim Crowley, Co-Principal
  • Julia Pritchard, Director of Special Education
  • Beth Hulbert, K-8 Math Curriculum Specialist

II. Agenda:

  • Tier II Interventions
  • Data from Semester 1 of the Math Lab
  • Grades 1 and 2 enrollment numbers for 2011-2012
  • Fall 2010 BT NECAP Results

III. Minutes of the Meeting:

  • The meeting began at 8:00am.
     
  • Alice Worth and Beth Hulbert presented an overview of the Tier II Intervention services that are happening in the school. In the lower grades we are using Leveled Literacy Intervention (LLI) through small group intervention (3 to 4 students per group). The first half of the year we have served 21 children. Students are pulled from across the grade levels. In the middle school, Tier II interventions are being delivered through the Intervention/Enrichment time in the schedule (through Tier II Math and Tier II Reading programs). Tim walked the Committee through the letters and explained that the purpose of the letters is not only to inform parents/guardians of the services, but, to also inform parents/guardians about what interventions are but also the specific goals that each student is working on during the intervention time. Beth Hulbert also shared information about the use of common assessments in the lower grades to address concerns at the Tier I (classroom level). She shared an example from both Kindergarten and 4th grade, as to how, based upon the use of a common assessment, grade level teachers have made changes to their instruction to serve students before moving onto the next concept. Tim Crowley shared with the Committee samples of the 72+ letters that were sent out to parents/guardians of the students who are receiving Title II interventions in the middle school.
     
  • Beth Hulbert then reviewed the Math Lab Program with the members of the committee. Beth shred some quarter 2 Math lab pre and post assessment data. The longer we wait to approach intervention (in grade level) the harder it is to address the students’ misconceptions and weaknesses. The Math Lab runs on the same quarter schedule as the school. Currently in the third grade, we are serving 12 students in 1st grade; 20 students in 2nd grade; 12 students in 5ht grade; 12 students in 6th grade; 8 students in 7th grade; and 8 students in 8th grade. Beth clarified that all students in a grade level are assessed and the students, based upon the data, result in the students who are identified to be served in the Math Lab. By doing this, we are able to gather important data to show student growth and the impact that the interventions are having on students who participate in the Math Lab. We are having to pull students from Specials classes in order to address their needs in the Math Lab. Beth Hulbert will come to a Barre Town Board meeting near the end of the year, when we have more data and share this information with the Board.
     
  • John Barone shared with the Committee and overview of the Fall 2010 NECAP Results for Barre Town Middle/Elementary School. In summary: 77% of the students (in grades 3 through 8) scored proficient/proficient with distinction in Reading (compared to 73% at the state level); 66% of the students (in grades 3 through 8) scored proficient/proficient with distinction in Mathematics (compared to 65% at the state level); and 71% of the students (in grades 4 and 8) scored proficient/proficient with distinction in Writing (as compared 50% at the state level). In the areas of disaagregated data, in Reading, our students in the Free/Reduced Lunch cohort, overall we saw a decline in our students’ performance. This Fall, we had 56% of the students in this cohort group score proficient/proficient with distinction as opposed to 62% last year. Students with Disabilities cohort group (in Reading) scored 17% proficient/proficient with distinction as compared to 26% last year. In Mathematics, 46% of the students in free/reduced lunch cohort group scored proficient/proficient with distinction as compared to 56% last year. Students with disabilities (in Mathematics) scored 7% proficient/proficient with distinction as compared to 17% last year. In writing for grade 5, the students in the free/reduced lunch cohort group, 42% of the students scored proficient/proficient with distinction (as compared to 36% at the state level) and 14% of the students with disabilities scored proficient/proficient with distinction (as compared to 10% at the state level). In grade 8 Writing, 30% of the students in the free/reduced lunch cohort group scored proficient/proficient with distinction (as compared to 46% at the state level) and 14% of the students in the students with disabilities cohort group scored proficient/proficient with distinction (as compared to 12% at the state level). AYP determination will be coming out in early April. John Barone’s prediction is that the school will remain identified for not making AYP for students in the Students with Disabilities cohort for both Reading and Mathematics. His prediction is that the school will again become identified in these two cohort groups in both reading and mathematics. The Committee also looked at the progression of actual cohort groups of students through the grades (for example growth in reading grades 5 through 8).
     
  • Due to time, we will post pone the agenda item of Grade 1 and Grade 2 enrollment numbers for 2011-2012 to the next meeting on April 6, 2011.
     
  • Before the meeting adjourned, Julia gave a brief overview of the Special Education students’ data and looked at trends in the data. Julia also talked about the number of students who have exited Special Education (doe to growth in performance) as well as the number of students who moved into the school just before the assessment was given and therefore not part of our instruction/delivery system. The meeting was adjourned at 9:30am. Our next meeting April 6, 2011 is canceled. The committee will meet again on May 4, 2011. This meeting maybe extended to accommodate the agenda.

Respectfully Submitted,

John L. Barone, Sr., Ed.D.(abd)
Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment


 

Barre Town Curriculum Committee – Minutes of the Meeting
January 5, 2011
Minutes of the Meeting

I. In Attendance:

  • Brenda Buzzell, Barre Town Board Chair., and Committee Chair.
  • John Barone, Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment
  • Kim Caravan, Parent/Community Member
  • Sarah Child, Parent/ Community Member
  • Ry Hoffman, Middle School Guidance Counselor
  • Tim Crowley, Co-Principal, BTMES
  • Alice Worth, Co-Principal, BTMES
  • Julia Pritchard, Director of Special Education, BTMES

II. Agenda:

  • Update on K-12 Health Education Curriculum
  • Update from K-12 History Curriculum Committee
  • The use of the Danielson’s Evaluation Model and Walk Throughs

III. Minutes of the Meeting:

  • The meeting was called to order at 8:05am by the committee Chair., Brenda Buzzell.
     
  • Based on questions from Brenda Buzzell, John Barone updates the committee on the progress of the BSU K-12 Health Education Curriculum. John Barone and Karen Heath are meeting with Donna McAllister from the Vt. Dept. of Education, to review our approved K-12 Health Curriculum and its implementation. The K-12 Health Education Curriculum Committee spent 2 years developing a comprehensive K-12 Health Curriculum. The curriculum is written to be implemented by a Health Educator, which at grades K-5 we currently do not have. Each school, Barre Town and Barre City, will have to work with the Health Curriculum Committee to design how the curriculum will be implemented: classroom teachers (embedding content into other areas, such as Language Arts), Guidance Counselors, School Nurse and/or PE Teacher. However, John Barone will be coming to Finance Committees next year, in the budget building process, to advocate for a K-5 Health Educator, potentially to be shared between Barre Town and Barre City Schools.
     
  • John Barone shared information with the committee on the work that is currently being done by the K-12 History Curriculum Committee. The Committee was reminded that based upon the new Common Core, the Vermont Department of Education has recommended that school districts not put a lot of emphasis on new curriculum development in the areas of English/Language Arts, Math and Science until the Common Core is released and the new Science GE’s. The new Science GE’s are due out in April of 2011 and the K-12 Science Curriculum Committee will be up and running to continue with unit development. The K-12 Math Curriculum Committee is going to start this summer and into next year based upon the new Common Core.

However, the K-12 History Curriculum Committee is up and running and making  progress. Minutes from the meetings were shared with the committee. This committee has just started its meetings for the year and has started to define projected outputs, “By the time a student graduates from Spaulding High School . . . “ and a list of grade specific vocabulary. We have also started to identify overlap of information being taught across the grade levels and we are starting to define what the content/units of study should be at grade level. The committee reps from BTMES are: Dianna Martell, Karen Heath, Marge Brusetti and Ben Feld.

The goal is to create a Humanities approach to the delivery of English/Language Arts  and History/Social Studies through a combined interdisciplinary approach to these two content areas. This will be a focus in grades 6 through 10. This approach will not come easily and will take professional development, curriculum mapping and training of teachers. This is not going to be an overnight change. We will have to plan this and do it with thought and purpose.

  • During the mini-Administrative retreat in October, 2010, the K-12 Administrative Team focused on results of our walk through observations and talked about strengths and weaknesses of instruction. Based upon our conversations, we came up with a focus on clear objectives in all classrooms across the BSU. We, as the admin team also agreed to try the Danielson’s model and come back to the group with feed-back. This is what we will be doing at our K-12 Admin. meeting in January, 2011. John Barone shared with the Committee examples of the Danielson’s rubrics and forms that the admin team is experimenting with. The BSU lacks a clearly articulated teacher evaluation model and a clearly defined “target” in terms of what good teaching is and how it is defined. We also need to continue to blend the Walk Through Observations with a formal observation process.
     
  • Our next meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, February 2, 2011.
     
  • Meeting adjourned at 9:35am.

Respectfully Submitted,

John L. Barone, Sr.
Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
Barre Supervisory Union

 

 


 

Barre Town Curriculum Committee Meeting
December 1, 2010
Minutes of the Meeting

I. In Attendance:

  • Brenda Buzzell, Committee Chair. and Chair of the BT School Board
  • John Barone, Assistant Superintendent,
  • Alice Worth, Co-Principal
  • Tim Crowley, Co-Principal
  • Venus Allen, Math Lab Teacher
  • Ry Hoffman, Guidance Counselor
  • Kim Caravan, Parent/Community Member
  • Sarah Child, Parent/Community Member

II. Agenda:

  • Update on the Math Lab at BTMES
  • Clear Objectives – an SU wide focus
  • Update on the Common Core

III. Minutes of the Meeting:

  • The meeting was called to order at 8:05am.
     
  • Alice Worth began with an over view of the Math Lab Concepts at Barre Town Middle/Elementary School. The program/position is funded through the use of the school’s Title IIA Class Size Reduction funds. Venus Allen, the teacher in the Math Lab joined the meeting this morning to share information about the program. Ms. Allen started with an explanation of the base line assessment that is used to determine students eligible for services in the Math Lab.

The first quarter of this school year, Ms. Allen served a total of 35 students. This marking quarter, because of the addition of Kim Benson in the Math Lab, we have doubled the number of students served and we have started to serve students in grades 7 and 8. In addition to her work in the Math Lab, Ms. Allen does some work pushing into math classes, for example in Mrs. Battistoni’s room in grade 2 and team teaching a lower level Math class in 6th grade with Glenda Allen. Ms. Allen was selected through an internal application process. There were 2 internal candidates. Ms. Allen was selected due to her experience and work in mathematics. She is currently participating in the VMI (Vermont Math Initiative) program working on her Master’s Degree in Mathematics.

Ideally, students are in the Math Lab for 8 weeks. Currently, students spend roughly 7 weeks in the Math Lab working on specific, identified weaknesses/deficiencies in Math. Ms. Allen shared some data regarding the progress that students made in the first marking quarter. The most progress was made by students in the second grade. Students are attending the program on average 4 days a week, 45 minutes each day. For 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th Grade, students attend Math Lab as part of the Enrichment Block. For the lower grades, quarter 1 we pulled students out of Science and/or Social Studies time. During quarter 2 we are pulling students from their “Specials” time. This is a little bit of an issue with students, missing “Specials” classes. We did not want to pull students from the core classes, especially with the emphasis on writing in Science and Social Studies. A letter was sent to parents informing them of when students are being pulled. Parents are given the option of not being pulled from “Specials” time. To date, 2 parents have opted not to have their students pulled from “Specials” classes. A letter went home to the parents of each student in the Math Lab and outlined the specific goals that students worked on and if students met the goals and why or why not.

In the near future, we will look at data to see longitudinal growth of students’ progress, who have attended the Math Lab. Additionally, we hope to use the Math Lab as a professional development opportunity for the math teachers within the school. For example, having math teachers observe how a concept is introduced or reinforced within the Math Lab to struggling students and/or have the Math Lab teacher do model instructing within the regular math classes.

  • John Barone shared information with the committee on the information that is currently posted on the BSU Website. All recent curriculum work is being posted to the website so that the site becomes a resource for staff and for parents. For example, all K-12 approved curricula is posted on the website.
     
  • As a supervisory union, based upon information gleaned from Walk Through Observations, we (the K-12 Administrative Team) have agreed to focus on clear instructional objectives. In all schools, there is an expectation that teachers will post in every learning environment, the instructional objective(s) of the lesson being presented. The objective needs to be communicated and explained to the students as well as, the learning objective needs to be clear to an observer who comes into a classroom. There is a lot of work around this issue in the Skillful Teacher program and book. We have had a number of our teachers go through the Skillful Teacher program. Additionally, we have shared a chapter of the Skillful Teacher text with the staff and on January 4, 2011, this will be rolled out and discussed with the teachers here at Barre Town at a faculty meeting.
     
  • John Barone shared information with the committee on the Common Core. Alice Worth, Beth Hulbert, Karen Heath, Michele Cote, Tom Sedore and John Barone attended meetings last month, hosted by the Vermont DOE regarding updates on the Common Core. Information was handed out to the Committee. Here is new information we know about the Common Core:
    • It will be between 12 to 24 months before a teacher-user friendly version of the document for English/LA and Math will be released.
    • The recommendation from the DOE is to not start alignment of the Common Core in LA and/or Math until a teacher user friendly document is developed.
    • The teacher friendly version will contain specific targets of instruction per grade level.
    • In terms of Literacy, by the start of 12th grade, the expectation for reading will be: 70% informational text/non-fiction and 30% literature. School based curriculum and standards will need to change to reflect this.
    • Continue to focus on instruction for the next few months.

In terms of the work being done across the BSU, our unit development in LA is continuing through Bridges and VALLI. We are using the Common Core draft to drive our work. We will start Math Curriculum Development this summer (hopefully with the other 3 SU’s we were planning on working with). The new Vermont Science GE’s are due out in April. We will pull the K-12 Science Curriculum Committee back together starting next fall. The current K-12 History Curriculum Committee is working already with the Common Core requirements.

The next meeting of the BT Curriculum Committee is schedule for January 5, 2011.

The meeting was adjourned at: 9:35am.

Respectfully Submitted,

John L. Barone, Sr.
Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
Barre Supervisory Union

 


 

 

Barre Town Middle/Elementary School – Curriculum Committee Meeting
November 3, 2010
Minutes of the Meeting

I. In Attendance:

  • John Barone, Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum
  • Brenda Buzzell, Committee Chair. & Chair of the Barre Town Board
  • Tim Crowley, Co-Principal
  • Alice Worth, Co-Principal
  • Julia Pritchard, Director of Special Education
  • Kim Canavan, Parent/Community Member
  • Sarah Child, Parent/Community Member
  • Ry Hoffman, Middle School Guidance Counselor

II. Agenda

  • Follow up on Teacher and Special Education Teacher job Description
  • Meeting the Challenges for Change

III. Minutes of the Meeting:

  • The meeting was called to order at 8:00am by Brenda Buzzell.
     
  • The Committee reviewed the Teacher/Special Education Teacher job description and responded to questions, comments, and concerns regarding the information on the descriptions. In response to a question, Alice Worth and Tim Crowley shared information from the October 21st Administrators’ Retreat and shared the SU work/focus on clarity of objectives. Alice and Tim shared the process that the SU administrators went through – sharing walk through observations and talking about strengths and weaknesses of instruction and the agreement to focus on clarity of objectives for the remainder of the year. Alice also talked about her visitation to Barre City Elementary/Middle School and her observation of the faculty meeting on Monday and how the administration facilitated an activity regarding clarity of observations and then the expectation to post objectives (and agendas) on the board and how Barre Town will replicate the same activity here. The administration also talked about the future use of Curriculum/Content Maps (once all of the core K-12 Curricula are created and receive Board approval). The Committee also spent some time talking about the purpose and the use of the new Parent Portal. Mr. Crowley mentioned that within a short period of time, the Parent Portal will also become a Student Portal at Barre Town. Students in grades 5 through 8 will receive pass words and access codes to the portal so students can check their own grades/progress. An overall recommendation from the Committee is that teachers create and publish a syllabus for each class/grade (which should include not only the content of the course/grade, but also grading expectations, homework requirements, etc.). Once finalized and approved, the recommendation was that these job descriptions be posted on the school’s web site and possibly, in handbooks.
     
  • Possible future agenda item for the Curriculum Committee (and a recommendation to include student input), what things could/should teachers, at grade level, be doing in common to support/help students? For example, common grading expectations, common homework expectations. With students, could this be done through the Student Council, through TA’s?
     
  • Brenda Buzzell talked about the Board’s attempt to meet the Challenge of Change goals set by the Vermont Department of Education and the Commissioner’s Office. Programmatically, there are no major changes/additions coming this year from curriculum development/revisions that the Committee and the Board need to know about or be worried about. The one area of concern is the new K-12 Health Education Curriculum. As it stands now, the expectation is that through collaboration with the classroom teachers, Guidance, PE teachers, and the school nurse, that the Health Curriculum is being delivered to the best of our abilities. This is minimally meeting the expectation of Health curriculum. The Committee also talked about the use of the Enrichment time in the schedule and how this time meets the needs of students at all ends of the spectrum – enrichment (PSTL, Science Through Literacy, History Through Literacy and remediation – Tier II Math and Reading and Tier III – Special Education services). Our goal is to phase out PSTL in grades 7 and 8 being the students Language Arts classes. We will keep PSTL, however, this will be a supplemental enrichment program enriching what is happening in the English/Language Arts class. This is the current model in the 5th and 6th grades and as students transition into 7th and 8th grade, this model will follow the students. This is also the model that is being adopted by Barre City Elementary/Middle School. Textbook companies are also jumping on the band wagon with the new Common Core and as opposed to purchasing big bulky text books, companies are coming up with interest based small readers that are differentiated to meet students’ reading needs.
     
  • The meeting was adjourned at 9:28am. The next meeting of the Curriculum Committee is scheduled for December 1, 2010.

Respectfully Submitted,
John L. Barone, Sr.
Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
 


Barre Town Middle/Elementary School – Curriculum Committee Meeting
October 6, 2010
Minutes of the Meeting

I. Attendance:

  • John Barone, Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
  • Brenda Buzzell, Committee Chair & Chair of the Barre Town School Board
  • Kim Canavan, Parent/Community Member
  • Alice Worth, Co-Principal
  • Julia Pritchard, Director of Special Education
  • Tim Crowley, Co-Principal

II. Agenda:

  • Class Size Information from the DOE
  • Update on the Common Core
  • Barre Town’s Science NECAP Scores
  • Job Descriptions
  • September & October Professional Development Calendar

III. Minutes of the Meeting:

  • The meeting was called to order at 8:07am.
     
  • The Committee members received the document, “Model Policies Regarding Minimum and Optimal Supervisory Union-Wide Average Class Sizes” from the Vermont DOE, dated August 31, 2010. The document outlines the Commissioner’s recommendation for optimal average range by grade cluster and state board maximum average per grade cluster. Alice Worth provided for the Committee to review the Barre Town Teacher/Student Ration for grades K-8 compared to the state model policy.
     
  • Information was shared with the Committee on the Common Core. John Barone, Beth Hulbert, Karen Heath and Tom Sedore (from SHS) attended a meeting on September 3, 2010 with the Commissioner, the Deputy Commissioner, and Curriculum Directors/Assistant Superintendents from across the state of Vermont. The Common Core was the focus of the meeting. A document outlining the information from the meeting was distributed to the Committee members. John Barone has been attending school faculty meeting (10/05/10 at BTMES) to share this information with faculty/staff. Here is a summary of major points:
    • The Common Core in Literacy and Math will replace the Vermont GE’s.
    • There is a 4 year roll out projected time line from adoption to full implementation and the new assessment
    • The NECAP will be replaced by the SMARTER BALANCE Assessment
    • 30 of the 48 states which adopted the Common Core have signed on to do this regional assessment.
    • Measured Progress, the authors of the NECAP are the lead group at the table to help develop the Common Core, which will more than likely be modeled after the NECAP Assessment.
    • The Accountability System will change, based on the reauthorization of NCLB to be more of a system that recognizes school growth vs. the current punitive system.
    • The Commissioner’s Office is recommending, for the areas of Math, LA, and Science not to do any new curriculum work but to wait a year or two and focus on instruction, until the Common Core is fully rolled out.
    • BSU has put Math on hold until this summer. The Science GE’s are being rewritten to include the elements from the Common Core so we will wait and continue with unit development next year. ELA was are fine. We will continue with our unit development, since we have been working with the Bridging Program and VALLI for the last three years and the Common Core has been used. The K-12 History/Social Sciences curriculum committee will start (next week actually) and we will use the Common Core and the current Vermont GE’s as we begin our work.
    • On another note, the reauthorization of NCLB will require student performance data in the teacher evaluation system. We do not know yet what this will look like, but, to quote the Vt DOE Commissioner, “This is coming.”
       
  • Science NECAP Results for Barre Town Schools – The results of the Spring Science NECAP scores we shared with the Committee. In 4th grade at BT, 61% of the student scored proficient or above. In 8th grade 22% of the students scored proficient or above. The 4th grade saw a 15 percentage point increase from last year. The 8th grade saw a 4 percentage point decrease in scores from last year. The Science teachers will be looking at the Science results at the October 11th Staff Development meeting and talking about curricular and instructional implications. The area where we continue to be weak, as a school district and as a state in Inquiry.
     
  • Job Descriptions – Alice Worth handed out the draft copies of the Teacher and Special Education teachers job descriptions. As your homework, please review the job descriptions (Committee members were given hard copies and electronic copies are included with these minutes) and bring these and your comments, questions, and feed-back to the Committee meeting on November 3, 2010.
     
  • Alice Worth handed out a copy of the Professional Monthly Meeting calendar for 2010/2011. Alice discussed the purpose and need to plan out the topics of the faculty meetings here at Barre Town School so that staff are aware of topics, what materials to bring, what information to prepare for, etc. As a school, the staff is reading the text, Discipline With Dignity and this will be the focus of the February 28th Staff Development Day work at the school.
     
  • The next meeting is scheduled for November 3rd from 8:00am – 9:30am in the 2nd floor conference room at BTMES. Topic: Job Descriptions. Please review the documents and bring your comments/questions, etc. to the next meeting.
     
  • The meeting was adjourned at 9:25am.

Respectfully Submitted, John L. Barone, Sr.
Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
Barre Supervisory Union

Barre Supervisory Union
POSITION TITLE: Special Education Teacher / Learning Specialist

QUALIFICATIONS: Regulations Governing the Licensing of Educators and the Preparation of Educational Professionals

  • Vermont teacher’s certification, Special Education 80-83, 85, 87
  • Such qualifications as the Barre Supervisory Union may find appropriate and acceptable upon the advice of the Superintendent and Special Services Director

REPORTS TO: Director of Special Services

POSITION GOAL: The teacher will provide students with specialized instruction and oversee individual education plans to assist students to make progress toward functional and educational goals in general education curriculum.

PERFORMANCE RESPONSIBILITIES:
To carry out the Barre Supervisory Union Mission, special educators / learning specialists’ responsibilities are as follows:

  • Possess accurate and current knowledge of Vermont Statutes, State and Local policies, and procedures for students with disabilities and be in compliance with State and Federal regulations.
  • Implement current and effective teaching practices and to meet the standards of expectations as described in Barre Supervisory Union teacher job description.
  • Maintain accurate, proper and complete documentation associated with each student, including but not limited to evaluation plan and reports, IEPs, progress reports and meeting minutes.
  • Communicate and/or consult with students, parents, colleagues, administrators, and outside agencies in a professional and respectful manner.
  • Prepare, implement, monitor, and evaluate IEP goals and objectives, in collaboration with the IEP team, which meet the specific needs of students and report progress to parents and staff.
  • Coordinate and facilitate meetings associated with programming for students eligible for special education.
  • Select and administer appropriate assessment tools and interpret and summarize results to determine special education eligibility and make recommendation for instructional programming.
  • Adapt / modify curriculum and materials in collaboration with general education teacher.
  • Consult regularly with classroom teachers and paraprofessionals and their teacher partners about student needs and accommodations.
  • Maintain thorough knowledge of academic needs, current performance, and effective educational strategies for all students on case load.
  • Establish a system to document all contacts (and attempted contacts) to parents and IEP team including date, time, purpose, and summary of outcome(s).
  • With prior approval from Director of Student Services, prepare and forward referral information for outside evaluator(s) when needed.
  • Coordinate related services and treatment teams as specified by the IEP.
  • Provide reports to administration as requested.
  • Complete Medicaid documentation for Medicaid eligible students.
  • To select and request appropriate instructional materials.
  • Regularly supervise and annually evaluate paraprofessionals.
  • Perform other responsibilities as directed by the Director of Student Services or Principal

TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT: Contract, salary and benefits as prescribed by the Master Contract between the Barre Board of School Directors, and the Education Association.

EVALUATION: Performance of this position will be evaluated based on the BSU Supervision and Evaluation Plan.

The Barre Supervisory Union will comply with all applicable federal and state non-discrimination laws and will not discriminate against any person or group on the basis of race, creed, color, national origin; gender, age, handicapping condition and/or disability or sexual orientation.

April 29, 2010
 

Barre Supervisory Union
POSITION TITLE: Teacher

QUALIFICATIONS: Regulations Governing the Licensing of Educators and the Preparation of Educational Professionals.

REPORTS TO: Principals

POSITION GOAL: The teacher will advance each student’s academic performance, support her/his personal development and provide learning opportunities that foster the development of life-long learning and independence. He/She will actively support the mission of the Barre Supervisory Union and BSU schools and contribute to the development of a professional learning community.

PERFORMANCE RESPONSIBILITIES: To carry out the school’s mission, teacher responsibilities are organized into five broad areas: Instructional Strategies, Teacher-Student Relationships, Professional Responsibilities, Staff Relationships and Other as Directed by the Principal. These areas reflect teaching practices outlined in Vermont’s Framework of Standards and Learning Opportunities and the research and work of Jon Saphier, Charlotte Danielson, and James H. Stronge. Performance Responsibilities are the basis of on-going training provided through in-service days, professional team(s) and faculty meetings.

1. Instructional Strategies:
The primary role of the teacher is that of director of learning in the classroom. The teacher must plan, implement, and evaluate programs, which facilitate learning.

  • Plans lessons with clear objectives and demonstrates a repertoire of strategies to provide clear and accessible instruction to students.
  • Plans lessons using the BSU curriculum and Vermont Standards and Grade Level Expectations.
  • Demonstrates knowledge of content.
  • Uses researched-based teaching strategies & models known to be effective.
  • Communicates high expectations for all students to succeed.
  • Maintains momentum of the lesson and maximizes allocated instructional time.
  • Engages students in learning.
  • Plans and communicates procedural routines.
  • Evaluates student progress in a timely manner using practices that are designed to provide useful feedback to students, which supports their understanding and growth.
  • Uses assessment information to make instructional decisions.
  • Effectively uses questioning & discussion techniques.
  • Uses technology to enhance learning.
  • Provides whole and small group, as well as individualized instruction as necessary and appropriate.
  • Is responsive to student’s interests and questions.

2. Teacher-Student Relationships:
Effective teachers recognize that a student’s emotional development directly affects his/her academic growth. A teacher, therefore, should respond to a student’s emotional and social needs to facilitate that growth.

  • Recognizes the student as an individual.
  • Possesses traits and creates an environment that engenders student respect.
  • Maintains & communicates school standards for discipline through a positive approach.
  • Creates a classroom climate that is safe emotionally and physically.

3. Professional Responsibilities:
The competent teacher has a responsibility to seek improvement in professional self-growth, in the school system, and in the teaching profession, and to foster positive and effective relationships with parents.

  • Plans a program of study that meets state and local curriculum and assessment expectations.
  • Maintains professional competence by keeping current in research and best practice related to standards, curriculum, instruction, assessment and the School Action Plan.
  • Demonstrates a willingness to take risks in trying new methods and materials in order to create meaningful learning opportunities.
  • Actively contributes to the enhancement & improvement of the school.
  • Regularly communicates with parents by a variety of methods including newsletters, conferences etc.
  • Is available to students and parents for education related purposes outside the instructional day when requested or required to do so under reasonable terms.
  • Maintains records as required.
  • Works collaboratively with Special Educators, 504 Case Managers and others as necessary to fully implement student plans including attending meetings when necessary.
  • In conjunction with Special Educators and other support service personnel, plans and supervises purposeful student-centered assignments for Para-educators.
  • Supervises students outside the classroom as necessary.
  • Completes reports associated with her/his area of teaching responsibility as directed by the Principal.

4. Staff Relationships:
The responsibilities of a teacher are broader and more inclusive than teaching a specific subject or grade level. As a member of the total school community the teacher should share the responsibilities for accomplishing the objectives of the school and for cooperating with other staff members towards that end.

  • Creates and contributes to a positive work environment.
  • Works collaboratively with colleagues to support the school mission.
  • Participates and contributes to the work of faculty and staff teams.
  • Collaborates with team members to meet the needs of all students, including those with disabilities.

5. Work Ethics and Habits:
Teachers, as professionals, uphold positive work ethics and habits and model these for students.

  • Will follow basic workplace requirements.

Other reasonable duties as may be assigned by the Principal.

TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT: Contract, salary and benefits as prescribed by the Master Contract between

EVALUATION: Performance of this position will be evaluated based on the BSU Supervision and Evaluation Plan.

Barre Supervisory Union and its member schools will comply with all applicable federal and state non-discrimination laws and will not discriminate against any person or group on the basis of race, creed, color, national origin; gender, age, handicapping condition and/or disability or sexual orientation.
 


Barre Town Middle/Elementary School – Curriculum Committee Meeting
September 1, 2010
Minutes of the Meeting

I. Attendance:

  • John Barone, Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
  • Brenda Buzzell, Committee Chair. & Chair of the Barre Town School Board
  • Laura Moore, Barre Town School Board Member & Parent/Community Member
  • Kim Canavan, Parent/Community Member
  • Alice Worth, Co-Principal
  • Julia Pritchard, Director of Special Education
  • Tim Crowley, Co-Principal

II. Agenda:

  • Meeting Dates for the 2010-2011 School Year
    (9/01, 10/06, 11/03, 12/01, 1/05, 2/02, 3/09, 4/06, 5/04, 6/01)
    8:00 – 9:30AM – 2nd Floor Conference Room
  • 2010-2011 K-12 Curriculum Development/Review Plan
  • 2010-2011 – BSU Assessment Plan
  • 2010-2011 – BSU Goals/Initiatives
  • Review of school’s Corrective Actions from the DOE

III. Minutes of the Meeting:

  • The meeting was called to order at 8:05AM.
     
  • Did the parent representatives to the Committee receive the agenda? John Barone will follow up with Donna Hill to make sure that the parents’ e-mail addresses are on the list to receive the agenda.
     
  • Meeting dates for the school year have been proposed for the first Wednesday of every month, 8:00am – 9:30am. Dates and times are set.
     
  • John Barone handed out the 2010-2011 Curriculum Review/Development Plan. We discussed the progress that we have made over the last couple of years in the development/alignment of our K-12 curriculum and discussed the areas (mathematics and history/social sciences) that we will be focusing on this year. We also discussed the impact of the new Common Core and the future of the NECAP Assessments. We also discussed the impact and delivery of the new K-12 Health Education curriculum. At present, the curriculum for grades K-5 rely on classroom teachers, Guidance Counselors and the school Nurse to deliver. We rely on the F&CS teachers to deliver the health curriculum as part of their F&CS curriculum, thus requiring them to double up on the amount of GE’s to be covered. This is an issue we need to discuss as a supervisory union.
     
  • John Barone handed out the K-12 Assessment Plan. Starting this year, we have common assessments in grades K-12 that will be used not only to guide instruction and for the use of scheduling, but, also for Progress Monitoring across all grade levels. Barre Town will be in year 2 of Corrective Actions, and therefore we have decided to progress monitor all students in grades K-8. Specific assessment data will be collected and sent to John Barone for input into the computer and for the use of monthly progress monitoring meetings, which Beth Hulbert and Karen Heath will be doing with grade level teams. The Science and History teachers will, at the October 11th Staff Development Day, be selecting items from the DOE Item Bank to embed into their curricula and do with students once/month, as the math and language arts teachers are doing.
     
  • John Barone shared with the Committee the BSU goals/initiatives for the 2010-2011 school year. This is the third year of the same goals and initiatives across the supervisory union. We have also developed a supervisory union philosophy, “Doing Whatever It Takes To Ensure Success For Every Child.” This philosophy has been echoed through the opening staff development day, the openings at our schools and through the work that we are doing as a K-12 SU. The handout references the 8 characteristics of effective schools, which come directly from the Roots of Success document.
     
  • Barre Town Schools has been identified for not making AYP (Adequate yearly Progress) in Mathematics and Reading for students in the cohort group of Students with Disabilities. Let’s not forget that the school did make gains from the previous year, in which we were identified for students (in both Reading and Mathematics) in the cohort groups of Free/Reduced Lunch and students with disabilities. In a review of the required actions, each required action is already happening. New to the Corrective Actions this year is that Barre Town will need to send a letter to parents regarding the school’s identification. This used to be only a requirement for Title I schools. However, starting this year, non-Title I schools also must send the letter to parents. We will continue to monitor our progress and work with our new School Improvement Coordinator, Noel Bryant, from the Vt. DOE.
     
  • Tom Crowley gave a brief overview of the new enrichment (PSTL) program. Tim talked about how assessment data was used for the placement of students in the PSTL and/or the Math Plus Program. Tim also discussed the Literacy Through History and the Literacy Through Science courses. Additionally, if students need remediation in Math and/or Literacy, we have Tier II classes in both of these areas. We are able to serve students at both ends of the spectrum, based upon the use of student performance data.
     
  • Our next meeting is set for October 6th, 8:00am in the Barre Town 2nd Floor Conference Room. The meeting was adjourned at: 9:30am.

Respectfully Submitted,
John L. Barone, Sr.
Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment

 


Barre Town Middle/Elementary School – Curriculum Committee Meeting
June 2, 2010 Minutes of the Meeting

I. Attendance:

  • John Barone, K-12 Director of Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
  • Brenda Buzzell, Committee Chair. & Chair of the School Board
  • Tim Crowley, Co-Principal
  • Alice Worth, Co-Principal
  • Julia Pritchard, Director of Student Support Services
  • Kim Caravan, Parent/Community Member
  • Sarah Child, Parent/Community Member
  • Laura Moore, School Board member/Parent
  • Bill Kirkland, School Board member
  • Beth Hulbert, K-8 Math Curriculum Specialist
  • Karen Heath, K-8 Literacy Curriculum Specialist

II. Agenda:

  • Use of the PSTL Program for 2010-2011
  • Math Lab Program for 2010-2011
  • AYP Determination
  • End of the Year Report to the BSU Board

III. Minutes of the Meeting:

  • Mr. Crowley began the meeting with an explanation of the proposed use of the PSTL program for next year. All students, in grades 5 through 8, will be in a heterogeneously grouped Language Arts class for 45 minutes. A second 45 minutes will then be designated for an additional literacy time. During this time students will be differentiated and receive instruction, based upon needs, for example, special ed students will be pulled out for services, Tier II services for identified students, PSTL students will receive enrichment, and we will be creating a Social Studies/Literacy integrated class and a Science/Literacy integrated class. This model being implemented is designed on the recommendations from our VALLI Consultant. It is based on the use of student performance data, teacher recommendations, and supports the curriculum changes that are being made at the high school. Kathleen Brinegar, our current VALLI consultant, is going to spend the remainder of this school year working with the middle school teachers to prepare the lessons/materials for these pull-out programs. Our goal is to make these classes creative, fun, interesting, infusing literacy instruction. We will follow up in the fall with a report on how the program is proceeding (how students were selected for PSTL, the transition between the SS/Science Literacy classes, etc.).
     
  • Beth Hulbert presented to the committee updates on the Math Lab Program for 2010-2011 here at Barre Town. Venus Allen has been hired as the Math Lab Teacher for next year, focusing on grades 1 through 5, and possibly Tier II services for grade 6. Venus will be providing instruction to small groups of students (5 to 6 max. per group) at a time, 35 to 45 minutes 4 times per week, for about 8 weeks. This is short intervention around big concepts in Math (number sense, multiplicative reasoning, early number concepts, for example). We have a meeting planned between Venus, Beth, and the Math Lab staff at Barre City. This is supplemental service – in addition to their regular math class.

For identification purposes, we will use assessments that are currently being used at Barre City Schools in their Math Lab Program. Students will be given assessments at the start of the school year and this data will be used to identify the students who will need remediation, based upon the big concepts, in the Math Lab. (First grade we will not pick up until the second half of the school year – they are not ready yet). We will start with 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th grade immediately. We will give the assessments at the start of the school year; Beth and Venus will do the scoring, identify the students and have them in the Math Lab ASAP. Beth is advocating for one part-time para in the Math Lab for next year. Beth also indicated that regular math teachers will be encouraged to come into the Math Lab to observe Venus and see what she is doing in the lab. Additionally, we will offer workshops (and maybe courses) to the math teachers to support their understanding and professional development around the big mathematical concepts. Laura Moore is encouraging the administration to be in early communication with the Board regarding the progress and needs to keep this program moving forward. We will follow up with the progress on this program in the Fall, 2010.

  • AYP Determination – the school is still identified, however, we are only identified for students with disabilities in both Math and Reading. This is an improvement from last year, where we were identified, in Math and Reading, for students with disabilities and for students in free/reduced lunch. Brenda Buzzell acknowledged John Barone for his leadership in establishing professional learning communities that had all teachers working together to improve student outcomes.
     
  • The meeting was adjourned at 9:37am. Thank you all for another great year on the committee. We look forward to coming back together in the fall.

Respectfully Submitted,
John L. Barone, Sr.
K-12 Director of Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment


Barre Town Middle/Elementary School – Curriculum Committee Meeting
April 7, 2010
Minutes of the Meeting

I. Attendance:

  • John Barone, K-12 Director of Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment

  • Brenda Buzzell, Committee Chair. & Chair of the School Board

  • Julia Pritchard, Director of Student Support Services

  • Alice Worth, Co-Principal

  • Kim Caravan, Parent/Community Member

  • Sarah Child, Parent/Community Member

  • Karen Heath, K-8 Literacy Curriculum Specialist

II. Agenda:

  • Wilson Reading Program initiative w/ Special Education

  • K-1-2 Fountas & Pinnell Phonics Program for 2010-2011

  • Common Core: English/LA and Math Documents – DRAFT

  • Impact of Common Core on current curriculum work

III. Minutes of the Meeting:

  • The meeting was called to order at 8:10AM by Brenda Buzzell.

  • Julia Pritchard and John Barone presented the initiative on the Wilson Reading Program for students in Special Education who require reading services through their IEP’s. The Wilson Reading Program has been selected for a variety of reasons: we are using some of the program in our schools already, to some extent, the Stern Center for Language and Learning provides local training opportunities, the research-based approach to reading for our most intensive needs students will provide common approaches and common language across the supervisory union, grades K-12. A team of 9 from the BSU will be attending training this Friday, sponsored by the Stern Center in So. Burlington. We are also looking at starting the initial training with all of our Special Educators across the SU for 3 days this summer, as well as the Fundations training, and then we will also have the on-site coaching support as well during the 2010-2011 school year. The Wilson Reading Program and the Fundations component will tie in nicely with the Fountas & Pinnell Phonics Program we are adopting in grades K-1-2 next year.

  • John Barone mentioned that this summer the K-12 Admin. Team needs to take a look at all intervention (Tier II) services across the SU and get a better handle on what services are provided, to which students, and where we may have gaps. We also need to look at a systemic means of addressing these needs.

  • Alice Worth, John Barone, and Karen Heath will be participating in a conference call as part of a grant to invite Barre Town to be part of a Literacy Coaching Program for grades K-1-2. Barre Town (and one other school in Vermont) is being considered as a pilot school for implementing this program. This program is looking at bringing on-site coaching/embedded professional development to our K-1-2 teachers. This is something that we have been trying for three years to bring to our schools. Alice and John will provide more information to the Curriculum Committee and to the Barre Town School Board.

  • Karen Heath, K-8 Literacy Curriculum Specialist joined the meeting and talked about the Fountas & Pinnell Phonics Program for grades K-1-2. Our goal is to implement this program next year for all students in grades K-1-2 – to bring a systemic approach to teaching phonics. We are currently using the program, in bits and pieces, in our grades and we are using the Fountas & Pinnell assessments. To train teachers, we are doing a train-the-trainers model. We will train an initial group of teachers, by grade level, and these teachers will be the go-to person for their colleagues and will be providing professional development to their colleagues during Staff Development Days.

  • John Barone presented copies of the DRAFT of the Common Core Curriculum documents for English/Language Arts and Mathematics. These documents are an attempt at a national curriculum for English/LA and Mathematics. In comparing the Common Core to the current Vermont GE’s (Grade Expectations) the English/LA Common Core and the Vermont GE’s are closely aligned. The Common Core also embeds literacy into the Social Studies/History and Science content areas. The Mathematics Common Core and the Vermont Mathematics GE’s are quite different. The Common Core documents are on a fast track for adoption by December 2010 and from there the GE’s in Math, English/LA, and Science will be rewritten. This will have an impact on the NECAP Assessment as well. However, the recommendation from the Vermont Department of Education is that we continue to alignment to the Vermont GE’s and the NECAP Assessment and then we will see what changes the adopted Common Core and new GE’s will have on our curriculum work. It is too early to really know what the overall impact will be.

  • Today’s meeting was adjourned at 9:30AM.

    Our next meeting is Wednesday, May 5, 2010. At this meeting we will look at the BTMES Restructuring Plan and we will bring an example of some reading intervention that is currently happening (Phyllis Wiggins instructional video clip).

Respectfully Submitted,
John L. Barone, Sr.
K-12 Director of Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
Barre Supervisory Union


Barre Town Middle/Elementary School – Curriculum Committee Meeting
February 3, 2010
Minutes of the Meeting

I. Attendance:

  • John Barone, K-12 Director of Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
  • Brenda Buzzell, Committee Chair. & Chair of the School Board
  • Kim Caravan, Parent/Community Member
  • Bill Kirkland, School Board Member
  • Julia Pritchard, Director of Student Support Services
  • Molly McClellan, Special Education Teacher (Grade 5); Data Team Member
  • Sarah Child, Parent/Community Member
  • Alice Worth, Co-Principal
  • Tim Crowley, Co-Principal
  • Andy West, Director of Curriculum, Windsor Northwest SU
  • Andrea McLaughlin, Teacher and Data Team Member

II. Agenda:

  • Update on the Corrective Actions & Data Team Work
  • Preliminary look at the Fall 2009 NECAP Results

III. Minutes of the Meeting:

  • The meeting was called to order at 8:02AM.
     
  • We welcome Sarah Child as a parent/community member to the committee meeting this morning and hope that she will consider becoming a regular member of this committee.
     
  • Molly M., Julia P., and John B., presented to the Committee an overview of what it means to be an identified school, the corrective actions, and the restructuring (DRAFT) plan. Because BTMES is an identified school and in year 1 of corrective action, we attended a Data Retreat in Rutland, at which a team of teachers and administrators attended, representing the school. At the Data Team meeting, we identified hypothesis as to why our schools’ scores are the way they are and we identified barriers to our progress. From there, the hypothesis were brought back to the faculty and they added to the work done. As a result, the Data Team continues to meet and has developed a draft Restructuring Plan. Molly & Julia walked the committee through an over view of the goals/objectives of the Restructuring Plan. As we went through the plan, Julia, Alice, John, Molly and Andrea commented on the actions that the school is already taking to address the concerns/goals and future plans to address the goals/objectives.

    The members of the Data Team present at this morning’s meeting commented on the impact that the Data Team has started to see on the school’s community and on the overall relationship of the school. It has been difficult for the school to take a critical look at itself, but, Data Team members are meeting with grade level teams and presenting the work being completed by the Data Team and sharing the draft of the Restructuring Plan.
     

  • Fall, 2009, NECAP Scores – John Barone presented to the Committee the results of this Fall’s NECAP scores in Reading and in Mathematics. (We did not receive Writing Scores for this fall – Grades 5 and 8 – because this was a pilot year for new writing prompts on the assessment and therefore, schools did not receive writing results.

    We are proud to announce that BTMES has seen excellent progress in the scores for this year: 77% of our students met or exceeded the standard in Reading (grades 3-8). The state average was 72%. 71% of our students met or exceeded the standard in Mathematics (grades 3-8). The state average was 66%. Each individual grade (with the exception of 6th grade – however, when looking at the growth of this group as a cohort group, this group is making significant gains in Reading) saw an overall improvement in scores in Reading and Mathematics. The scores have been shared with the faculty at yesterday’s faculty meeting and John Barone is scheduled to present the scores formally to the Barre Town School Board at the second meeting in February.
     

  • AYP Determination should be out some time in early March. John Barone will report this information out when it comes in. We did a quick review of the Disaggregated Results. Students in the cohort group of Free and Reduced Lunch (FRL) at BTMES scores 62% at meeting or exceeding the standard in Reading. The state average for FRL in Reading was 57%. The students in the cohort group of Special Education in Reading scored 26% at meeting or exceeding the standard. For the state the score is 24%. In Mathematics, the FRL population in Mathematics was 56% and the state was 49% in Mathematics. In Special Education the score in Mathematics was 17% and the state was 22%. Brenda acknowledged that the scores reflected the explicit work of John Barone, the leadership team, teachers, and staff to collaborate in professional learning communities resulting in instructional practices to help children succeed. The committee was appreciative of everyone’s efforts and pleased that our students ‘ scores are improving to reflect the learning that is happening throughout our school.
     
  • Today’s meeting was adjourned at: 9:30Am.

Our next meeting is Wednesday, March 17, 2010.

Respectfully Submitted,
John L. Barone, Sr.
K-12 Director of Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
Barre Supervisory Union


Barre Town Middle/Elementary School – Curriculum Committee Meeting
January 6, 2010
Minutes of the Meeting

Happy New Year!

I. Attendance:

  • John Barone, K-12 Director of Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment

  • Brenda Buzzell, Committee Chair. & School Board Chair.

  • Kim Caravan, Parent/Community Member

  • Jack Carrier, Middle School Math Teacher

  • Tim Crowley, Co-Principal

  • Julia Pritchard, Director of Student Support Services

  • Alice Worth, Co-Principal

II. Agenda:

  • Update on the middle school Math Enrichment Program

  • Check-in on status of full day Kindergarten

  • Proposal for room for students with challenging behaviors

III. Minutes of the Meeting:

  • The meeting was called to order at 8:10AM. We were a little late starting due to weather related travel.

  • Jack Carrier, middle school Math teacher came to the committee meeting this morning and gave an over view of the middle school Math enrichment program. Mr. Carrier informed the committee of the history as to how students for the program were selected (based upon students’ scores on the Mathematics NECAP assessments and/or teacher recommendation). Currently, the enrollment in the program is: 25 students in the 7th grade and 26 students in the 8th grade. The program uses the Connected Math Program, however, the students are able to go deeper into the depth of the math and the instruction and homework focuses more on the challenge section and the extension portions of the Connected Math Program. Currently, the students in the enrichment program are about 2 weeks ahead of where the students in the “regular” Connected Math Program currently are. In regards to when the 8th grade students enter Spaulding High School, the students in this enrichment program will more than likely be recommended for Algebra I Honors or the IMP (Integrated Math Program). The question was raised about having these students in a separate program versus keeping these students in regular heterogeneous math classes and differentiating instruction and assessments? There was an interesting conversation around this question and the philosophical differences that came from the people who responded to this question. Since this is a pilot program, it is constantly being evaluated to be sure this is the best practice for all students’ learning. The committee will revisit this program later this spring.

  • Julia Pritchard presented information on the Alternative Special Education Program that is proposed for the 2010-2011 school year. Julia began by looking for the number of students who have behavioral, emotional needs whose needs we are not meeting and are impacting other students’ ability to access their education. In Julia’s data, there are 14 students in grades K-3 (8 are general education and 6 are special education). For grades 4 through 7 there were 23 students identified (8 general education and 15 special education). The goal of this program is to look at our current staff and resources and focus these resources on the most needy students to meet their needs and to impact the education of general education students. An overview of the program is that the students would have a “home base” classroom to start their day and for academic and/or emotional support. However, there would be opportunities to main stream, as required by law, when and where appropriate. The room will be staffed with a special education teacher and a team of para educators who would be fluid and go in and out of classrooms with the students. For the first year, it was decided to focus on the 15 students in grades 5 through 8 and remember that placement will be made by an IEP team to determine who is most appropriate for placement in this program with a potential cap of 9 to 10 students. The goal of the program is to have these students mainstream back into the regular classroom, as much as possible.

  • Report out on full day kindergarten – The full day kindergarten is in its 5th year here at Barre Town Middle/Elementary School. The overall feeling regarding the full day program is that the program is working fine. We are taking a closer look at the Literacy Program at the Kindergarten level and we are involving the teachers at this level in more focused training and more intentional instructional practices – based on current research and “best practices.” We are planning to have the issue of early Literacy (vocabulary development, phonemic awareness, alphabet knowledge, etc.), addressed through the work by the K-12 English/Language Arts Curriculum Committee.

  • The meeting was adjourned at 9:35AM.

  • The next meeting is scheduled for: February 3, 2010.

Respectfully Submitted,

John L. Barone, Sr.
K-12 Director of Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
Barre Supervisory Union


Barre Town Elementary/Middle School – Curriculum Committee Meeting
September 2, 2009
Minutes of the Meeting

I. In Attendance:

  • John Barone, K-12 Director of Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
  • Brenda Buzzell, Board Chair. & Committee Chair.
  • Kim Canavan, Parent/Community Member
  • Tim Crowley, Co-Principal, BTEMS
  • Shelly Weeks, Parent/Community Member

II. Agenda:

  • Meeting Dates; 9/02, 10/07 (changed to 10/14), 11.04, 12/02, 3/17, 4/07, 5/05, 6/02
  • K-12 Curriculum Development/Review Plan
  • K-8 Assessment Plan
  • Cognitive Thinking Words

III. Minutes of the Meeting:

  • Welcome to the 2009-2010 School Year and to the Barre Town Schools’ Curriculum Committee.

  • We started the meeting with an overview of programs such as VALLI, Bridging, the Bridges to Mathematics, and Connected Math Program. John Barone gave an over view of where we are with each of these programs.

  • John Barone handed out and reviewed the BSU Curriculum Review/Development Plan and went over it with the committee members. Goals for 2008-2009 have been met. We focused on the goals for this school year. All curriculum work has a K-12 focus to build an aligned, well articulated curriculum to encompass all grade levels.

  • John Barone presented the K-8 Assessment Plan for Literacy, Math and Science. This is a result of the school being identified as not making AYP and having to do Progress Monitoring as one of the corrective actions. We have created baseline assessments in Literacy and Mathematics for the start of the school year to determine levels that students are at upon entering the school year and to meet students’ needs. The assessment plan is in place for both Barre Town and Barre City schools.

  • The Cognitive Thinking Words is a 5 – 12th grade initiative based on “thinking” words on the various NECAP Assessments. 12 words were identified, based upon Bloom’s Taxonomy, of key terms, such as describe, evaluate, and posters were made that list the words and give definitions. Teachers will be taught to embed these words into their instruction. For grades K-4, teachers will work with the Bridging Consultant to develop developmentally appropriate versions of these words.

  • Next Meeting: October 14, 2009 – This is a change of meeting date!
    Invite Beth Hulbert to give an overview of the training and implementation of the Connected Math Program for middle school & present the Science NECAP Results.

Meeting adjourned at 9:34am. Thank you all!

Respectfully Submitted,
John L. Barone, Sr.
K-12 Director of Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment


 

Barre Town Curriculum Committee Meeting
March 4, 2009
Minutes of the Meeting

I. In Attendance:

  • Brenda Buzzell, Committee Chair. & Barre Town School Board Member
  • John L. Barone, Sr., K-12 Director of Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
  • Kim Canavan, Parent/Community Member
  • Tim Crowley, Co-Principal
  • Karen Heath, K-8 Literacy Curriculum Specialist
  • Mike Olson, Administrative Intern
  • Dr. Ted Riggen, Co-Principal

II. Meeting Minutes:

(a) The meeting was called to order at 8:35am.

(b) Today’s meeting agenda:

1. The Early Book Center – An overview
2. Feed-back on the March 2nd Staff Development Day
3. Fall 2008 Disaggregated NECAP Data

  • Congratulations on the passage of all three school budgets!
  • We welcome Alice Worth as the new Co-Principal here at Barre Town Elementary/Middle School starting July 1, 2009.
  • Karen Heath, the K-8 Literacy Curriculum Specialist, presented an over view on the Early Book Center here at Barre Town Elementary/Middle School, an extra support for K, 1, 2, reading, designed to supplement reading and to make a connection between the school and home. Every child in these grades has the opportunity to sign out a book, bring the book home, read the book with his/her parents/family and then comes back and meet with Karen (the person running the Book Center) and re-tell the story. Part of Karen’s job is to also know the reading level of each student and to help students select appropriate reading level books. This information is provided through the POA data. The books are K-2 resources, so when there is a student who is reading above the 2nd grade level, said student is then directed to the library to select reading-level appropriate materials. Karen Heath provided a copy of the handout that is given to parents/guardians/volunteers. Karen walked the committee members through the handout. She pointed out that the section, Questions That Elicit Deeper Thinking is a new section to the handout and is a direct result of the school’s NECAP results and the need to improve student performance on the Analysis and Interpretation subtest. Word ID and Vocabulary will also need to be addressed in this packet and maybe an addition to the packet. A question was raised about the struggling readers and if this packet/strategies is being used at home? Is there an opportunity for parent/community volunteers to work with identified struggling readers through the Early Book Center? We have a few volunteers working in the Center now, but, we can use more. Who coordinates the volunteers? John Barone will follow up on volunteer suggestions.
     
  • John Barone (along with Karen Heath) presented the committee with an overview of the activities that the faculty, staff, and administration were involved in during the March 2nd Staff Development Day. An emphasis was again placed on the teachers, especially in grades two through eight, working collaboratively between the two schools (Barre Town Elementary/Middle School and Barre City Elementary/Middle School). The afternoon (1:00 – 3:00) was spent with the K-8 teachers working collaboratively to be introduced to the new Power School student management data system and then reviewing our current report card format and content and working to develop a common report card for both schools, grades K-8.
     
  • Disaggregated Fall 2008 NECAP Results – John Barone presented the disaggregated Fall 2008 NECAP results to the committee members and reviewed the data with the committee. Mr. Barone mentioned to the committee that the school’s Leadership Team is in the process of conducting a Needs Assessment, based upon the NECAP Results, and we are looking at strengths, weaknesses, and needs for the school. This information will be used to help created the strategies for the Consolidated Federal Grants (Titles I, IIA, IID, IV and V) for the 2009-2010 school year. The data clearly shows that in Reading and Mathematics, our data is flat lining (not improving) and declining.

III. Next Meeting:

Our next meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, April 1, 2009 and we will go back to an 8:00am starting time.

IV. Meeting adjourned at 9:55am

Respectfully Submitted,
John L. Barone, Sr.
K-12 Director of Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
Barre Supervisory Union


Barre Town Elementary/Middle School
Curriculum Committee Meeting
February 4, 2009

I. In Attendance:

  • John L. Barone, Sr., K-12 Director of Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
  • Brenda Buzzell, Committee Chair. & School Board Member
  • Julia Pritchard, Director of Special Education/Student Support Services
  • Laura Moore, Board Member, Committee Member, & Parent
  • Kim Canavan, Committee Member &Parent/Community Member
  • Mark Scott, Committee Member & Community Member
  • Karen Heath, K-8 Literacy Coordinator
  • Guest: Jesse Shapiro, Reading Recovery Teacher

II. Minutes of the Meeting:

  • The meeting was called to order at 8:03am.
  • Follow up on “Everybody Wins”. John Barone contacted a representative from the program. Everybody Wins is in place at Barre City Schools and the program is going well. There was an invitation given to Barre Town Schools in the past but there did not appear to be an interest at the time. At present, the program is not able to take on new schools – they are at capacity. However, Barre Town Schools has been placed on a waiting list and if a slot opens up for next year, we will try and get the program here at Barre Town Schools.
  • Jesse Shapiro presented to the Committee the Tier II Reading Intervention Program that he is piloting this year. Mr. Shapiro presented an over view of the Fountas and Pinnell Leveled Literacy Intervention (LLI) program. (The program design is supposed to be used in partnership with the Reading Recovery Program). This is an intervention program designed for young students (grades K, 1, and 2) who struggle with reading and writing. The LLI is designed to be used with small groups of young children who need supplemental help to achieve grade-level competency. The ration is 3 children to 1 adult. Mr. Shapiro wants to focus on struggling readers in kindergarten to identify them earlier and provide supplemental services as early as possible. Additionally, with a focus in second grade, give the struggling students an additional dose of supplemental services before s/he progresses into the next grade.

The key features of the LLI lessons include:

  • A combination of reading, writing, phonics, and word study.
  • Emphasis on comprehending strategies
  • Attention to the features of nonfiction and fiction texts
  • Specific work on sounds, letters, and words in activities designed to help children notice the details of written language and learn how words “work”.
  • Help for students in expanding their vocabularies.
  • Explicit teaching for fluent and phrased reading.
  • Opportunities to write about reading to learn a variety of writing strategies.
  • High frequency words (emergent literacy skills)

The goal of the program is short term, intense, Literacy intervention. The activities used are grade level and developmentally designed and implemented.

Our current Reading Recovery Teachers are serving one less student and in place are spending time in classrooms (at specific grade levels) and providing this small group instruction in classrooms.

There was discussion on the possible development of an SU Pre-School Program that could be supported with Title I monies to provide early education services to all 4 year olds in the Barre Supervisory Union regardless of SES and/or achievement/ability level. Our Kindergarten teachers are reporting that they are seeing an increase in the number of children who are not developmentally ready to start Kindergarten. This concept is also supported by the VT State Bright Futures Council which shows that 40% of our Supervisory Union children are not ready for kindergarten in all five domains of development.

Jesse Shapiro has extended an invitation to the committee members to come in and observe the work that is being done with the students in the classrooms. If you are interested, please contact him to set up a time to observe (jshapbte@u61.net).

Mr. Shapiro will come back to the Curriculum Committee in April or May and present data regarding the students who are participating in the program and samples of the materials being used.

  • An overview of the Consolidated Federal Programs. John Barone presented a document which gave an overview of the Titles within the Consolidated Federal Programs (Titles IA, IIA, IID, IV and V). Mr. Barone gave an overview of the purpose of each of the titles and the use of strategies to spend the money allocated to each strategy. Additionally Mr. Barone discussed the creation of a CFP Planning Committee to write and develop an SU Action Plan and Needs Assessment process for planning for the spending of CFP Grant dollars. Laura Moore, Tim Crowley, and Karen Heath are members of the committee (along with John Barone) representing Barre Town Schools.
  • Fall 2008 NECAP Results – Mr. Barone shared with the committee an overview of the results of the 2008 NECAP Results. Overall:

69% of the students (in grades 3 – 8 at Barre Town Schools) met proficiency or above in Reading.
64% of the students (in grades 3 – 8 at Barre Town Schools) met proficiency or above in Mathematics.
60% of the students (in grades 3 – 8 at Barre Town Schools) met proficiency or above in Writing.

Additional information was provided comparing the school’s NECAP results with the SU Results and the State of Vermont Results; a comparison of this year’s scores to last year’s scores was given and a rough look at how students, by grade level, compared to the last three years of results. Mr. Barone will provide more information to the school and to the committee throughout the school year, the summer and at the start of the next school year.

Our next committee meeting is scheduled for March 4, 2009. Karen Heath has been invited to give an overview of the Early Book Center here at Barre Town Elementary/Middle School. Additionally, the next meeting (and subsequent meetings) will begin at 8:30am.

The meeting was adjourned at 9:35am.

Respectfully Submitted,
John L. Barone, Sr.
K-12 Director of Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment


Barre Town Curriculum Committee Meeting
January 6, 2009
Minutes of the Meeting - Happy New Year!

I. In Attendance:

  • Brenda Buzzell, Committee Chair., & Barre Town School Board Member
  • John L. Barone, Sr., Director of Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
  • Dr. Ted Riggen, Co-Principal, Barre Town Elementary/Middle School
  • Julia Pritchard, Director of Special Education, Barre Town School
  • Denise O’Maurice, Administrative Intern
  • Kim Canavan, Parent/Community Member
  • Bonnie George, Parent/Community Member

II. Meeting Minutes:

(a) The Meeting was called to order at 8:05am

(b) Improving Student Learning – Goals for 2009-2010

  • Students who do not qualify for Special Education services, we struggle in this school for Tier II services (support/supplemental services) to provide additional services to these students. This is an area that the school needs to focus on.
  • We are using part of our School Improvement Funds to train a teacher (Mr. Shapiro) in a research based supplemental service for students who are identified struggling in reading. This is a small start in meeting this need. The focus is on the lower grades (K-2). To accommodate this extra work, Mr. Shapiro will see a reduction in the amount of time that he dedicates to testing (for Special Education Eligibility) and will pick up this additional responsibility. We will invite Mr. Shapiro to come to our next Curriculum Committee meeting to give a presentation on this Tier II Reading Intervention strategy.
  • VALLI (The Vermont Adolescent Literacy Learning Initiative) will be in year three and focus on working with all teachers in grades 6, 7, & 8. The focus is to integrate reading and writing strategies into all disciplines.
  • The Bridging Program (focusing on the integration of Literacy in grades 3, 4, & 5) is a goal for next year; bringing the program here to the Barre Town Schools.
  • Dr. Riggen reviewed the use of Tier I interventions that are happening this year and the continuation of the process for next year, as part of the Progress Monitoring required as the school’s Corrective Actions through the Vt. Department of Education. Julia Pritchard explained the use of the Reading Recovery Program and that this program serves not only individual students, but, small groups of identified students as well.
  • There is a tri-board meeting this Thursday (1/8/09) to discuss the use of the Consolidated Federal Program funds and to look at how we are currently spending these dollars vs. how we need to be spending these dollars.

(c) Looking At Student Work – an initiative across the Barre Supervisory Union

  • John Barone introduced the group to the supervisory union goal of looking at student work and how teachers are being trained to look at student work to guide instructional practices. This process is being learned and practiced at each of the schools within the SU as well as on a large scale at the various meetings during the Staff Development Days. Mr. Barone led the committee through an activity where members were asked to read a passage, read the student work and then practice the ATLAS Protocol (which is the structure used for looking at student work).

(d) NECAP Release Items – an initiative across the Barre Supervisory Union

  • John Barone presented to the group an overview of how the teachers in
    grades 2 through 8 have selected and incorporated the NECAP Release Items into the curriculum. The goal of this process is to introduce students to the NECAP Release Items and to get students more comfortable with NECAP type questions throughout the school year as opposed to only doing test preparation the weeks before the NECAP Assessments are given. Mr. Barone shared with the group Grade 7 Reading Release Items and Grade 4 Mathematics Release Items so that committee members could see the types of questions that students are asked to complete.

(e) The meeting ended at 9:20am. Our next meeting date is: Wednesday, March 4, 2009. Agenda Items: Invite Jesse Shapiro to give an overview of the new Tier II reading intervention process, follow up on “Everybody Wins,” Tim Crowley will present information on a proposed new Math intervention program, and an overview of the use of the Consolidated Federal Grants Monies.

Meeting Minutes Respectfully Submitted by, John L. Barone, Sr.
K-12 Director of Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment


Barre Town Elementary/Middle School
Curriculum Committee Meeting
12/03/2008

I. In Attendance:

  • John L. Barone, Sr., K-12 Director of Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment

  • Brenda Buzzell, Committee Chairperson and School Board Member

  • Karen Heath, Literacy Coordinator

  • Tim Crowley, Co-Principal

  • Julia Pritchard, Special Education Director

  • Ted Riggen, Co-Principal

II. Minutes of the Meeting:

(a) The meeting was called to order at 8:05am.

(b) Karen Heath, Literacy Coordinator, began the meeting by responding to a question that was raised by a parent about reading instruction in the 5th grade. Teachers are working with students on “Just Right Books” – teaching students to select books at their appropriate reading level. In addition, in the 5th grade, we use the Houghton Mifflin Program for instruction and supplementing with novels through teacher guided instruction. Karen reported that she visited 5th grade classrooms and observed silent/independent reading, and direct reading instruction from both the Houghton Mifflin series and direct instruction around classroom novels. Overall, teachers are balancing between direct instruction in reading, choice reading, and silent reading.

In response to a question from Brenda, John Barone commented that the NECAP Release Items have been aligned and embedded into the Language Arts and Mathematics curricula for grades three through eight. The process of selecting, aligning, and collaboratively assessing the student work was explained. Additionally, as a result of the concern raised, John Barone commented on how he did focused visits into 5th grade classrooms at both Barre Town and Barre City schools and did see a variety of silent reading, literacy circles and direct instruction in reading.

Mr. Crowley commented on how the 5th and 6tth grade teachers have embraced the reading instruction, the two grades are working collaboratively on reading instruction, and that teachers are experimenting with grouping students by ability level to focus reading instruction based upon students’ needs. A letter to parents has gone out explaining this endeavor.

Karen Heath commented on the professional development work that teachers have been doing, specifically in the areas of reading and writing. Karen commented on an activity last Tuesday on looking at student work and using the student work to drive instruction. Additionally, professional development is happening collaboratively between the two schools (Barre City and Barre Town schools) and as an SU there is an emphasis on the integration of  the NECAP Release Items and looking at student work to drive instructional and assessment practices.

Karen Heath handed out a document titled, “Reading Instruction at Barre Town: An Overview.” A copy of this document is included with the minutes from today’s meeting.

(c) John Barone will postpone his presentation on the ATLAS Protocol for looking at student work and the use of NECAP Release Items (aligned to the curricula) for the next Curriculum Committee meeting. Additionally, John Barone would like to do a presentation to the full Barre Town School Board.

(d) A brief discussion was held to update the Bridges in Math program that is being implemented this year at Barre Town in grades K-5. The program is being implemented well and the teachers at Barre Town are working collaboratively with the teachers at Barre City on the implementation of the program. Additionally, the middle school Math teachers, from both schools, are looking at Math programs for implementation next year. Currently two programs are being reviewed based upon selection criteria that the teachers designed.

(e) The next meeting of the Barre Town Curriculum Committee meeting will be Wednesday,
January 7, 2009, at 8:00am in the Conference Room.

Respectfully Submitted,

John L. Barone, Sr.
K-12 Director of Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment

Reading Instruction at Barre Town - An Overview

Grades K-2

  • Guided reading, shared reading, independent reading.

  • Focus is on the 5 essential elements of literacy instruction: Phonemic Awareness, Phonics, Vocabulary Development, Fluency, and Comprehension.

  • Small groups are differentiated by reading ability for instruction-meet multiple times per week with the teacher.

  • Literacy centers.

  • Home-school connection supported by teachers and Early Book Center.

Grades 3-4 (grade 5 will be moving towards this)

  • Reader’s Workshop Format

  • Houghton-Mifflin program woven into this format, using the literature and some of the activities.

  • Focused intentional daily mini-lesson on reading strategy or skill

  • Guided practice with that strategy

  • Independent practice at student’s independent reading level – this should be at least 20 minutes of uninterrupted reading to build stamina in reading.

Grades 5-8 (Grade 5 is still very similar to grade 6)

  • Grades 5 and 6 use the Houghton-Mifflin program fully

  • Grades 5 and 6 have separate reading and language times each day.

  • Grades 7 -8 an hour per day for all aspects of ELA instruction – reading, writing, spelling, vocabulary, and grammar are woven into this time.

  • Through VALLI (Vermont Adolescent Literacy and Learning Initiative) we are integrating reading instruction into all subject areas (science, math, social studies and special classes).

  • Grades 7-8 have 2 additional reading classes per week.


Barre Town Elementary/Middle School – Curriculum Committee Meeting
October 1, 2008
Minutes of the Meeting:

  1. Meeting Attendees:

• Brenda Buzzell, Board Member, Committee Chair.
• John L. Barone, Sr., Director of Curriculum & Instruction
• Mark Scott
• Mike Olson, Administrative Intern
• Ted Riggen, Co-Principal
• Shannon Lessley, Science Coordinator
• Bonnie George
• Kim Canavan
• Laura Moore, Board Member
• Julia Pritchard, Director of Special Education, Barre Town Schools
• Tim Crowley, Co-Principal

  1. Minutes of the Meeting:
  1. The Meeting was called to order at 8:05am.

  2. Shannon Lessley, Science Coordinator for the Barre Town and Barre City Schools introduced herself to the members of the committee. Michael Olson, Administrative Intern (working with Dr. Riggen) introduced himself to the members of the committee.

  3. John Barone presented an over view of the September 22, 2008 Staff Development Day. A copy of the PreK-12 Schedule was presented and reviewed with the committee. Mr. Barone high-lighted a few of the activities on the schedule. Emphasis was placed on the work being done to bring together the teachers within the Supervisory Union. Specifically, discussion focused on the work the teachers in grades 3 – 8 are doing with the NECAP (New England Common Assessment Program) Release Items and working collaboratively to select and implement common release items between the two schools – Barre Town and Barre City throughout the school year. Additionally, a copy of the feed-back information was presented to the committee. The feed-back focused on three key questions: “What worked well?”, “What do we need to improve upon?”, and “What are out plans for the next staff development day?”. This information will be shared with the Barre Town School Board as well.

In response to a question regarding flexibility in the scheduling, the PreK-12 Professional Development Committee members are charged with surveying their colleagues and bringing to the planning committee teachers’ wishes/needs for the staff development days. There are some topics that are some what locked in for this year, due to, for example, the implementation of new curricula.

In response to a question about the number of staff development days – conversation centered on the number of staff development days within the Barre Supervisory Union and the need for additional days. An informal comparison was given between the BSU and other neighboring districts. The districts discussed host the majority of their professional development days before school begins and/or after the school year ends for students. This is a larger issue that needs to be discussed with the school boards (individual boards and/or the SU board).

  1. The Fall 2008 NECAP Administration is upon us. Students in grades 3 – 8 will be assessed in Reading and Mathematics (and in Writing for grades 5 and 8) on the following days:

Tuesday 10/07 – Reading 1 and Reading 2
Wednesday 10/08 – Reading 3 and Mathematics 1
Thursday 10/09 – Mathematics 2 and 3
Monday 10/13 – Writing 1 – Grades 5 and 8
Tuesday 10/14 – Writing 2 – Grades 5 and 8
Make-Up Sessions as needed.

Discussion, in response to questions, centered on students getting breaks (recess) in between the assessment sessions and accommodations for Special Education students, based upon IEP accommodations.

  1. Vermont Study on Children of Poverty – A brand new study has been prepared and will be sent out with the minutes of today’s meeting. Dr. Riggen began his presentation by referencing the 90/90/90 article/study. 3 years ago, Barre Town Schools invited the Vt. Commissioner of Education to the school to discuss children of poverty and the impact on schools. Barre Town School is participating on a state committee to look at randomly selected schools and how they are impacting (or in some cases not impacting) students of poverty within the state of Vermont. The focus of the committee is how some schools within Vermont are better able to meet the educational needs of children of poverty and why are others not able to do so?
  2. Spring 2008 Science NECAP Results. John Barone handed out a graphic representation of the results for Barre Town Schools’ 4th and 8th grade students. The scores compared the Barre Town students to the Barre Supervisory Union and to 4th and 8th grade students within the state of Vermont. The graphs also show how students performed in the 4 major focus areas: Physical Science, Earth Science, Life Science, and Inquiry. Shannon Lessley, the K-8 Science Coordinator, discussed the results, the process used to set the cut offs for Proficiency with Distinction, Proficient, Slightly Below and Substantially Below Proficient. Shannon was part of the team that set the standards. She also discussed the different types of questions used on the assessment, including the hands-on inquiry based experiment that was required of the students. The state has released the entire inquiry task from the Spring 2008 assessment. Shannon has taken the entire 4th grade inquiry task and implemented it into the 3rd grade Science curriculum for this year. The task fits perfectly into the 3rd grade curriculum. The 8th grade task has been implemented into the 6th grade Science curriculum for this year. Shannon is working with the teachers to implement the inquiry based instruction/experiments into the existing Science curricula.

Through an examination of the Science Release Items, Shannon Lessley is starting to work with teachers about changes in instruction in the area of Science. For example, students through the 4th grade are not taught how to use a bar graph. Using a bar graph was required on the 4th grade Science NECAP.

It is important to remember that the Science assessment is only given in grades 4 and 8. So the 4th grade students are being assessed on 4 years of Science and the 8th graders are being assessed on Science from grades 5 through 8. Where as the Reading and Math NECAPS assess one year’s (the previous year’s) grade level expectations.

  1. Our next meeting is Monday, November 3, 2008. The committee will look at Release Items in Reading, Writing, Mathematics, and Science.

Respectfully Submitted,
John L. Barone, Sr.
Director of Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
Barre Supervisory Union


Barre Town Curriculum & Teacher Support Committee Meeting
September 3, 2008

Board Members: Brenda Buzzell (Chair of Committee ) , Laura Moore
Administrators: Tim Crowley, Ted Riggen, Julie Pritchard
Curriculum Specialists: John Barone, Beth Hulbert
Community Members: Kim Canavan, Shelly Weeks, Bonnie George, Mark Scott

Meeting Organization:
Facilitator: Brenda Buzzell
Note Taker: Shelly Weeks
Time Keeper: Ted Riggen

Meeting dates were confirmed for the first Wednesday of every month, from 8:00am-9:30am. The November meeting will be Monday, November 3, 2008 so that John Barone, the Director of Curriculum, can attend.

Report on Bridges Math Program – Beth Hulbert

Beth reported that the professional development happened at the end of June 2008 and was very successful. The evaluations received from teachers/professionals was overwhelmingly positive. All Barre Town teachers in grades K-5 were trained. Beth Hulbert is working toward training all long term substitutes and para-educators on the Bridges program.

  • Penny Sterns, from Burlington, performed the training for grades K-1. Burlington schools have already fully implemented the Bridges to Math program.
  • Stephanie Hawkinberry performed the training for grades 2 – 3.
  • Beth Hulbert performed the training for grades 4 – 5.

All the program materials have been distributed. Meetings have been scheduled among teachers once a month which will allow team time to plan lessons.

Half of the staff development meeting in September will be spent looking at assessment information for each class. Teachers will be bringing work given in the classroom to the table for discussion and assessment.

Math program will require 1 hour and 20 minutes of daily instruction in grades 1-5, Kindergarten will require 45 minutes of instruction. Grades 1 and 2 could break this time up as they wish throughout the day.

Schedules are due next week from teachers to show this time allotment being scheduled into the academic day.

Social Studies could be the core subject that could take the cut in time to allow for this math instruction to take shape. The reason this subject would be chosen over the others is because of right now there is no assessment forecast on the horizons. John Barone did share that he and others are looking at a humanities approach to Social Studies instruction, combining this with the Language Arts subject in grades 5-8. He anticipates at least a two year outlook for working toward this.

Curriculum Directors Report – John Barone

Overall, last years eighth graders at Barre Town significantly declined in mathematics. At the end of their 5th grade year, this student population scored very strong; as they entered the seventh grade scores were showing they were starting to decline, and by the eight grade their scores were significantly low. The good news is this trend is not only at Barre Town, it’s nationwide.

Beth Hulbert and John are working toward connecting with Barre Town and Barre City sixth through eighth grade teachers to collaborate, connect, and strengthen the middle school mathematic program. By November, Beth said material will be distributed to both Barre City and Barre Town middle school teachers for program planning – some of which will be piloted by the teachers, and then everyone will come back to the table for discussion. Beth plans on coming back to this committee in March to share an update on

Beth Hulbert reported that a reason behind this decline in math performance is that currently the middle school math curriculum focuses significantly on proportional reasoning – that being multiplicative and fractional reasoning. This is disconnected to the way math instruction takes shape as a student reaches and works through middle school. Assignments in middle school focus more on Multiplicative Reasoning. Beth commented that the new Bridges math program could be a major key in addressing this problem.

John also reported on NECAP release items. A memo to teachers in grades three through eight will go out by 9/22 letting the teachers know that they will be required to work into their classroom instruction the data received from these release items so to address the apparent need of students within that classroom. John said these teachers will be receiving support material as well.

Tim Crowley brought up a good point about how the school will know whether or not the teachers are addressing the needs of their students by using this information. He said that when the teachers come to the tabled discussion in September, they will be sharing information about how things are going in the classroom; they will be bringing their student results to the table to help facilitate a direct discussion around this information.

The NECAP assessments are expected to take place between October 1-23.

Intervention and RTI report from Ted Riggen

As a reminder, RTI is the acronym for Response To Intervention. This is a regular education effort, not special education. However, these responses usually direct the conversations to Special Education needs if necessary.

Ted reminded the group that the current RTI model is a 3-tier model:

  1. Intervention happens in the classroom.
  2. Intervention happens outside of the classroom. This is still not considered Special Education. Examples include Reading Recovery, Math Lab, Tables staffed by licensed teachers in specific subject areas. This really allows a more one on one approach to learning.
  3. Special Education

Ted recognized on behalf of the Barre Town School, and the Board, that our school has very few tier two opportunities and that we will be looking into ways to broaden this opportunity.

Ted also made reference to the 90/90/90 study, and how children of poverty are still a targeted group of children who are not meeting the standards and so much attention is being focused on that population – not only, but much. Barre Town School is in the process of identifying the number of children in this population through data produced from the free and reduced lunch population.

An avenue that Barre Town is taking on giving opportunity in the classroom to these children to be able to get the attention they need from the teacher, and to be around a greater population of students who are able to perform in the classroom (aka who are meeting the standards) is to only give each grade level teacher a small amount of children in this population. This will allow the teacher to focus more on the student, and be better able to assist them throughout the year.

This process allows us the opportunity to for several players to become more invested in the success of a child, like school administrators, and can provide data which would be very helpful for a particular child’s needs. Questions like:

  • Are the parents invested?
  • Is the child invested?

…can be asked to and brought to the table for discussion, and help identify strategies that can happen for ultimately the success of the child.

Laura Moore expressed concern around the labeling of this population, stating that it would ultimately be in the best interest and success of every child to have this attentive, directive approach to their individual success. Ted concluded with that an understanding and underlying connection that the difficulty in success that schools are having is with the children in poverty population.

Tentative agenda for the next meeting:

Brief look/report from John on NECAP data
Overview of NECAP
School Action Plans
Brief Overview of Children of Poverty


Barre Town Curriculum and Teacher Support Committee/ Student Success Foundation Joint Meeting
Wednesday, June 11, 2008
8:00 AM

Board Members: Brenda Buzzell, Chairperson; Laura Moore, Chairperson, David Harrington
Administrators: Paul Moccia, Tim Crowley, Ted Riggen Laurie Gossens
Curriculum Specialists: Karen Heath, Beth Hulbert
Community Members: Kim Canavan, Shelley Weeks

Brenda Buzzell and Laura Moore called the joint meeting to order in the BTMES second floor conference room at 8:00AM. The Curriculum and Teacher Support meeting was rescheduled from June 4, 2008 to join the Student Success Foundation Committee in respect to an agenda that brought together the distinct work from each committee.

* Intervention-Delivery and Implementation
Laurie Gossens explained the restructure of the current Reading Recovery Intervention Program that is planned for the 2008-09 school year. This will allow for the present Reading Recovery staff to use time that is not scheduled for specific Reading Recovery intervention with first grade children to be used with small groups in Grades One, Two, and Three to work on targeted skills. It is estimated that there will be a 45 -minute block each day for a RR teacher to also work with a small group. This small group work may expand into Kindergarten if necessary.

This led into a discussion of the goals of the Federal No Child Left Behind Act. Tim Crowley noted that this law references that schools will use research based programs to target core instruction in meeting the need of all children before intervention is needed. He also spoke of Response To Intervention (RTI) that also is directed to core instruction. David Harrington echoed Tim’s observation that core instruction should be the focus of effort to ensure all children attain success.

Discussion on core instruction strategies ensued. Brenda inquired about the use of Fundations, a research- based program that is designed as whole class instruction to be taught in Grades One, Two, and Three as supplement to the reading curriculum. Fundations teaches children the structure of words to develop word attack skills and improve reading. It also correlates this phonetic approach to writing and spelling. Karen Heath mentioned that some teachers are inquiring about the training and she is looking into the possibility of two classrooms piloting this program. She also spoke about the success that the middle school students are having using the VALLI initiative.

*Length of the School Day
Laura explained that her committee had asked Tim to develop a survey of staff to get their input on two strategies to promote student success. This survey of two questions is in regard to:

  • Healthy children who participate in daily physical activity are more able to take on the rigors of academics.
  • Insure the use of appropriate technology by actively incorporating it into the curriculum within each classroom.
  • Tim shared the survey and members tweaked the wording and discussed decimation of this survey. Discussion ensued on restructuring within the present school day in regard to responses received from this survey. The importance of basic core instruction was again emphasized by the members present.
    It was decided that staff would be asked to indicate their grade level and sign their survey.

*Other
Beth Hulbert shared information about the two in-service days that will be devoted to training in Bridges, the new math curriculum.

The next Curriculum and Teacher Support meeting will be on Wednesday, September 3, 2008 at 8:00AM in the second floor conference room at BTMES.

The meeting adjourned at 9:30 AM.

Respectively Submitted, Brenda Buzzell, Committee Chair
 


Barre Town Curriculum and Teacher Support Committee Meeting
Wednesday, May 7, 2008

Board Members: Brenda Buzzell, Chairperson; Laura Moore
Administrators: Paul Moccia, Ted Riggen, Tim Crowley
Curriculum Specialists: Sarah Chap
Community Members: Kim Canavan, Bonnie George, Shelly Weeks

Brenda Buzzell called the meeting to order in BTMES second floor conference room at 8:00 AM.

* Health and Family Consumer Science Curriculum:
Sarah Chap had distributed the scope and sequence of the eighth grade Personal Choices and Relationship Unit along with the Alternatives to committee members before this meeting for all members to examine. Members present discussed this unit. Sarah explained that the material follows what has been presented in past years and is based upon Reducing the Risk Curriculum and Positive Prevention, a curriculum through the Red Cross.

The procedure for informing parents about the unit will follow the same procedure as for the Puberty unit in sixth grade that is recorded in the April 4, 2008 committee minutes. If parents decide to exercise the option to not have their child included in this unit’s instruction, the four topic alternatives of an independent research project were discussed.

Members thanked Sarah for a very thorough job of developing the detailed scope and sequence and appropriate alternatives for these two Family Health and Science Units in grades six and eight.

*NECAP Results:
Paul Moccia led the discussion on NECAP scores. It was noted that although Barre Town did meet Adequate Yearly Progress overall for all students in reading, writing, and math, the school failed to meet AYP in the sub categories of Children of Poverty and Children with Disabilities. It was noted that these populations have increased and that levels of intervention need to improve.

Paul explained that intervention is described as three tiers. The first tier is within the classroom, the second tier is with individual and small groups and then tier three is for students with defined disabilities. He noted that intervention through the VALLI project has been introduced for the middle school faculty and students. Brenda suggested that there is research based tier one programs that schools use in whole classroom instruction to complement the reading program. These programs such as Wilson Fundations that is specific to K-3 and other strategies in instruction have proven to improve student learning for children in all sub categories.

Discussion of strategies including research based interventions ensued. Paul and the administrators will explore strategies to improve student learning and discussion will continue at the June meeting.

The next meeting will be held on Wednesday, June 4, 2008 at 8:00 am in the upstairs conference room.

Respectively Submitted, Brenda Buzzell, Committee Chair

 


Barre Town Curriculum and Teacher Support Committee Meeting
Wednesday, April 2, 2008

Board Members: Brenda Buzzell, Chairperson; Laura Moore
Administrators: Paul Moccia, Ted Riggen, Tommy Walz
Curriculum Specialists: Sarah Chap
Community Members: Kim Canavan, Mark Scott, Shelly Weeks

Brenda Buzzell called the meeting to order in BTMES second floor conference room at 8:00 AM.

* Health and Family Consumer Science Curriculum:
Brenda explained that this continues to be on the agenda due to the curriculum having changed from past years, a parent concern on the content, and the committee’s request to review the scope and sequence, materials and resources that are being used for instruction.

Sarah Chap explained that the program is based upon You, Your Body, and Puberty Curriculum published by Human Relations Media. She presented the scope and sequence, materials and resources that are used in the sixth grade. The handout of the scope and sequence included the four lessons on Puberty and the fact that girls and boys are taught in separate classes for specifics on their body changes. This handout also included a statement of the teacher’s position on sensitive issues and topics that are not included in this unit. Discussion ensued and consensus was reached on the following:

The scope and sequence and the statement on sensitive issues and topics not included will be sent home to each 6th grade parent beginning this June, along with reminder letter that this unit will be taught. Parents will sign and return the letter and may use the handouts to encourage discussion with their child. Parents also will have the opportunity to discuss the class with the teacher and /or principal as is stated in the letter and will have the option to decide if this is an appropriate class for their child.

Sarah will bring the 8th grade scope and sequence and a similar sensitive issues/topics not included document to the next meeting for the committee to review. She will also bring any materials and other resources that are used in the 8th grade instruction on relationships and personal choices.

Sara will ask Tim Crowley to prepare a plan for any child whose parents’ decide that this is not an appropriate class for their child and present the plan at the committee’s May meeting. It was suggested that this plan could be an independent health study on other health aspects, independent study time on other core subject areas, etc.

The committee suggested that students are asked to complete an anonymous evaluation of the class following these units in 6th and 8th grade and survey students in grades 5-8 as to whether they would be more comfortable having all four lessons presented separately to girls and boys. The possibility of a question and answer format about this class at an Open House was also suggested.

The committee thanked Sarah and expressed that the curriculum is being presented well with sensitivity to students and parents. The concerns are that parents should have all information before the lessons are presented in order to decide if it is appropriate topic for their child and to also be a tool to provide a means to openly discuss issues with their child based upon what is taught in class.

*NECAP Results:
Paul Moccia and Tommy Walz began a power point presentation of the Barre Town New England Common Assessment Program (NECAP) results of children tested in grades 3-8 in October, 2007. Committee members were given handouts to review in preparation for discussion next month. Their brief summary showed that Barre Town students scored at or above state levels is reading, math and writing. However questions arose has to progress shown with our students and if our instruction needs to be examined in light of new research on how children learn. Our May meeting will discuss score results and the impact on instruction.

The next meeting will be held on Wednesday, May 7, 2008 at 8:00 am in the upstairs conference room.

Respectively Submitted, 
Brenda Buzzell, Committee Chair


Barre Town Curriculum and Teacher Support Committee Meeting
Wednesday, March 12, 2008
8:00 AM

Board Members: Brenda Buzzell, Chairperson; Laura Moore
Administrators: Paul Moccia, Ted Riggen Laurie Gossens
Curriculum Specialists: Karen Heath, Beth Hulbert
Community Members: Bonnie George, Nancy Pope, Kim Canavan

Brenda Buzzell called the meeting to order in BTMES second floor conference room at 8:05 AM. This meeting was rescheduled from March 5, 2008 due to a two-hour delay to the start of the school day as a result of a snowstorm.

* Health and Family Consumer Science Curriculum:
Brenda explained that this was on the agenda due to the curriculum having changed from past years and also a parent concern on the content.
Ted Riggen discussed the three-year focus that children in grades 6, 7, and 8 would be presented. Each grade level is divided into three content areas. These include:

Grade Six: Personal Development & Relating to Others; Introduction to Food preparation and Safety; Puberty Education
Grade Seven: Advertising and Consumerism; Substance Abuse Education; Physical Fitness
Grade Eight: Advanced Nutritional Concepts; International Cooking; Personal Choices and Relationships

Ted further explained that each year parents receive a general letter at the beginning of the program stating that parents of sixth and eighth grade students will receive another letter two weeks before the units on Puberty Education and Personal Choices and Relationships are started that will explain in detail what will be covered on these topics. Parents then have the opportunity to contact the teacher and /or principal for specifics on the content being taught to discuss if this is appropriate for their child. If after examining the material and discussing it with the teacher or principal, parents who find this not acceptable for their child may request that their child is removed from the unit of study and assigned to an independent study time on another topic. This complies with the Vermont Statues: Title 16: Education.

After further discussion, it was agreed that the Curriculum committee would review the scope and sequence and content of the Growing Up Curriculum. Members also asked to review any materials and other resources that are incorporated into these units. This will be done at the April meeting.

It will also be determined at this April meeting if the letters that go home to parents, are clear as to how a parent may proceed if he/she wishes that his/her child NOT participate in the unit.

*Everybody Wins:
Brenda mentioned that this federal program is present in Barre City and Montpeiler schools and discussion ensued as to Barre Town’s lack of participation. Karen Heath will look into this program for Barre Town next year. Kim Canavan was a past director and explained that it is very successful with minimal impact on teachers. Students are recommended by classroom teachers to have a volunteer adult mentor come once a week to share lunch time and literacy with individual student. The program provides a coordinator and also choices of books on various reading levels. Mentors and students meet in a common room to read and discuss books.
It was also requested that it be communicated that Barre Town is not opposed to having Everybody Wins as was previously reported.

* Math Curriculum:
Beth Hulbert presented a handout of the K-5 Math Program Selection and Implementation results of the two piloted math programs, Bridges and Investigations.

Bridges outperformed Investigations in the five areas identified for comparison.
She explained her recommendations and considerations to fully implement a new program this next school year.

One of these involves using two of the six snow days at the end of the school year as math professional development for all K-5 teachers. Since the state requires 175 school days and Barre Town has 180 days in their schedule, she would like to use the last two snow make –up days as math professional development for teachers. The other four snow days are scheduled as make-up days for students. Karen Heath noted that 6-8 teachers could use these days as professional development to continue with the adolescent literacy project, VALLI. Committee members agreed that this might be an excellent use of these days. Brenda noted that exchanging two of the six student snow days for teacher professional development days is a Board decision and that it would have to come before the full board as an action item. She asked Beth to provide all board members with the handout and for Beth to come and discuss this at the board meeting on March 19th.

The next meeting will be held on Wednesday, April 2, 2008 at 8:00 am in the upstairs conference room.

Respectively Submitted,
Brenda Buzzell, Committee Chair
 


Barre Town Curriculum and Teacher Support Committee Meeting
Wednesday, January 16, 2008
8:00 AM

Board Members: Brenda Buzzell, Chairperson; Laura Moore
Administrators: Paul Moccia, Tommy Walz, Tim Crowley
Curriculum Specialists: Karen Heath
Teachers: Cassie Major
Community Members: Bonnie George, Patty Merriam

Brenda Buzzell called the meeting to order in BTMES second floor conference room at 8:00 AM. This meeting was rescheduled from January 2, 2008 due to school having been closed that day as a result of a snowstorm.

* Results of Tech. Survey &Tech. Standards
Tommy Waltz presented a power point explanation of the technology survey developed by past Board member, Kerri Lamb through the VT School Board Association’s technology survey program. This survey was administered online and anonymously to teachers at Barre Town and is now being administered to Barre City and Spaulding High School teachers as a paper survey since it has not been efficient for Tommy to get the final result through an outside agency. This survey was based upon the Technology Grade Level Expectations that will be referred to in these minutes as Grade Cluster Expectations (GCE) as they were created by the Department of Education in 2001 and based upon grade clusters. All VT students are expected to have accomplished the GCE by the end of eighth grade. Tommy showed the results of the survey, which had many variables and limitations, but did show that areas of concern are:

  • Spreadsheets and databases
  • Spotty coverage of acceptable use
  • Lack of emphasis on research skills

He noted that reasons to celebrate at Bare Town are:

  • All the technology GCE are addressed at some point
  • We know what professional development training to offer.

There was discussion on methods of accountability, assessment of skills and methods to encourage more use of technology in all classrooms. Tim Crowley noted that based upon Al November’s work, it is important to develop an attitude to demonstrate to teachers what can be done and excite them to integrate technology GCE into their classrooms. It was also noted that a scope and sequence of technology skills based on the GCE be developed on a supervisory union level. Laura Moore noted that this should be done under the direction of the Technology and Curriculum Coordinators. This same technology presentation will be presented to the Barre Town Board and also to the SU Board in future meetings.

*Vermont Reads-VALLI-Update
Karen Heath reviewed the research based VALLI (Vermont Adolescent Literature & Learning Initiative) Program which BTMES middle school teachers are a part of. She explained that our cohort of language, science and social studies teachers were selected to be a part of this program. A Vermont Reads teacher from UVM comes weekly to work with these teachers on specific skills identified through a beginning assessment completed by our teachers. Cassie Major gave specific examples of how she is using this reading content program in her science classes to help children develop analysis and interpretation skills in reading non-fictional textbooks and materials. She reported that the children are very excited and that she has seen an improvement in vocabulary usage and overall in quiz scores. This program is designed to expand from the present cohort to include more BT teachers next year. It was noted that Barre City teachers also take part in Inservice Days and may apply to be part of this comprehensive research based literacy program next year. Paul Moccia said that he has also brought this information to the high school teachers. There was discussion of the benefits of this program and Karen noted that it is a middle and high school initiative to improve reading skills in content areas. Reports of VALLI at Barre Town will continue to come to this committee as well as any research results of our students’ skills.

*Continue Work in Other Disciplines
Paul Moccia gave a brief preview of the coordinated work that has been done to align the social studies curriculum in all Barre Schools. Members were given handouts to review and this coordinated work in all disciplines will be discussed in depth at the next meeting.

The next meeting will be held on Wednesday, February 6, 2008 at 8:00 am in the upstairs conference room.

Respectively Submitted,
Brenda Buzzell, Committee Chair
 


Barre Town Curriculum and Teacher Support Committee Meeting
Wednesday, December 5, 2007
8:00 AM – 10:00 AM

Board Members: Brenda Buzzell, Chairperson; Laura Moore
Administrators: Ted Riggen, Laurie Gossens, Paul Moccia
Curriculum Specialists: Beth Hulbert, Shannon Lessley
Teachers: Veronica Eldred, Ellen Sulek, Susan Koch, Patty Young
Community Members: Kim Canavan, Mark Scott, Bonnie George

Brenda Buzzell called the meeting to order in BTMES second floor conference room.

* Impact of Full Day Kindergarten
This is the third year of BTMES implementing a full day kindergarten program.

Ellen Sulek and Susan Koch, kindergarten teachers, stated that with the rise in kindergarten expectations, the full day session is beneficial to the children’s academic skills. They noted the social and language skills of children entering kindergarten need developing as compared to previous years. Children appear with more challenging behaviors and lower readiness skills. Brenda commented that this is consistent with state data of only 44% of children entering school with readiness in defined areas. She noted the statewide Building Bright Futures Council 's initiative is that every region will work on the indicator “children are ready for school.” There was discussion of children’s readiness skills in regard to societal changes. The teachers feel that the Responsive Classroom model works well with this age group to help with these skills. They also stressed the need to stay within our ideal class guidelines for kindergarten. Discussion ensued of communication of readiness skills to parents and the need for better communication with private early care and education providers.

Veronica Eldred and Patty Young commented that the children entering first grade appear much more ready to begin academics especially in written language followed by reading and math readiness. Socially, first grade children show improvement in problem solving and transitions from one activity or place to another. Children’s endurance of the full day academic schedule is improved along with overall behavior issues as many are now targeted before first grade.

*New Math Program
The present edition of Everyday Math Program that teachers use in grades K-5 is being discontinued. The new edition was made available for preview in March 2007. Beth Hulbert spoke of the process that teachers in Barre City used to choose and implement a new program. Since we are a Supervisory Union with Barre City sharing her as a math curriculum specialist and the fact that both schools use the same math program in grades 6-8, she arranged for a group of BC teachers to meet with our elementary teachers to explain their selection and implementation of Bridges. Beth was able to get materials so that one teacher in each of BT grades 1-5 could pilot some lessons in January. This is a researched based program distributed by Math Learning Center in Oregon. The program uses manipulatives to implement successful research based strategies to present and define math concepts. The program’s initial cost is $57,000.00 with about $3,500.00 maintenance cost each year to replace materials, workbooks, etc. This is a substantial overall savings to our present math program’s maintenance cost. Everyday Math costs $10,000.00 a year to maintain. Budgeting for this new program will be $50,000.00 since the district will save $7,000.00 in this year’s maintenance costs of the math materials budget.

Since Beth has access to Investigations, another research based math program, a teacher in each grade will also pilot this to allow for comparison. Discussion ensued on the advantages of children within a Supervisory Union working with the same materials within a curriculum and of the professional development benefits of teachers who share a curriculum specialist and have the same schedule for PD days within the SU.

The next meeting will be held on Wednesday, January 2, 2007 at 8:00 am in the upstairs conference room.

Respectively Submitted,
Brenda Buzzell, Committee Chair


Barre Town Curriculum and Teacher Support Committee Meeting
Wednesday, November 7, 2007   8:00 AM - 9:30 AM

Board Members: Brenda Buzzell, Chairperson; Laura Moore
Administrators: Tim Crowley, Paul Moccia
Teachers: Shannon Lessly, Karen Heath
Community Members: Kim Canavan,

Brenda Buzzell called the meeting to order in BTMES second floor conference room.

* DRA -results
Paul Moccia ‘s power point presentation displayed graph results of the Developmental Reading Results from 1999-2007. The data showed a dramatic increase in scores for all children including children in poverty and children who participated in Reading Recovery. Discussion ensued on the implications of this test on children in first and second grade. This included discussion on the research and early education initiatives. Although the results shown were impressive, it was noted that the data did not show the actual beginning and ending scores of children so the percentage gain was not measurable in comparison.

Paul explained that nine educators from BTMES attended a Department of Education conference on Response To Intervention, which is being piloted in seven VT schools. RTI is a scientic research based intervention program for grades K-5. This group will follow up with a meeting on December 6th Educators also visited Founders School in Essex Town to learn more as to how this Grade 3-5 school intervenes and successfully works with teachers to increase students’ skills and attain AYP.

* NECAP”S –possible restructuring
Discussion on different ways to administer this test to limit student stress ensued. It was also noted that although this is a timed test, children who need extra time to finish are able to do so.

* Kindergarten Curriculum/Program
Paul brought copies of the old report card and the one presently being piloted and used to show the difference in how children’s progress is aligned to the present Grade Level Expectations for Kindergarten. The report card now reflects concepts, skills, and strategies in English, Language Arts, Early Reading, Concepts of Print, Writing Process, Mathematics, Science, Physical Education, Art, Music and Personal and Social Skills. Discussion on developmentally appropriate practices and the new research on the relationship of music/brain development ensued. The committee will follow up next meeting with a report from K and Grade One teachers as to the impact of Full Day Kindergarten in preparing children for formal academics.

* Develop December’s Agenda
Along with the Kindergarten follow up, the committee asked Paul to have a presentation of the math program that is being considered to replace our present Everyday Math. The Everyday Math has published a new edition of the program which went public in March 2007. Committee members stressed that the Board needs to know details of a new program that is being built into a budget, so that they will be able to articulate this to
Bare Town taxpayers.

The technology survey was also discussed, as a future agenda will look at the technology standards as they are included in the overall curriculum.

Committee members agreed to break briefly from the meeting at 9:30 AM today and attended the judging of the Harvest Soup Contest sponsored through the Farm to School Grant. The Times Argus covered this event and the winners will be on the local cable station.

The meeting adjourned at 9:50AM.

The next meeting will be held on Wednesday, December 5, at 8 :00 am in the upstairs conference room.


Respectively Submitted,
Brenda Buzzell, Committee Chair


Barre Town Curriculum and Teacher Support Committee Meeting
Wednesday, October 3, 2007 -
8:00 AM - 9:30 AM

Board Members: Brenda Buzzell, Chairperson; Laura Moore
Administrators: Tim Crowley, Ted Riggen
Teachers: Sarah Chapp, Barbara Shipman
Community Members: Kim Canavan, Mark Scott

Brenda Buzzell called the meeting to order in Tim Crowley’s office at BTMES.

* Health and Family Science Class
Sarah Chap, teacher of this class, noted that the name of this class was previously Family and Consumer Education Class. However, in response to national, state, and local directives in wellness and health, the focus of this class now reflects the new name. It is still offered to students in Grades Six, Seven, and Eight two times per week.
Sarah reviewed the curriculum, which is a three-year progression of topics.

Grade Six – Personal Development and Relationship With Others which includes bullying and harassment: Kitchen Safety, including nutrition and cooking: Puberty Education.
Grade Seven – Advertisement/Consumerism: Substance Abuse incorporating the curriculum of Project Alert: Physical Education Analysis Unit
Grade Eight – Nutrition: Eating Disorders and Sexual Education/ Personal Choices/Healthy Relationships.
Discussion ensued on these topics. It was noted that parents would be notified of topics with the option of requesting that their child not attend a controversial lesson. Sarah further noted that Grade Eight would have a “Make your own Soup” contest using local ingredients as a part of the Farm to School Grant. The winner will be hosted on the local TV channel cooking show.

It was further noted that since the focus of the class has changed, sewing will no longer be offered, but this may be included in the after school program for interested students.

* Spanish Program Implementation
Barbara Shipman gave an update on the Spanish Program. She noted that the class average of nineteen students in grades seven and eight meets three times per week. The scheduling allowed former French students to be kept separate from former Spanish students with one exception and that all have settled in and are learning Spanish very well. Spanish has also been incorporated into the culture of the school and that many students and teachers in K-8 are using the word or phrase of the week with enthusiasm. Discussion of the effects of this on the school population was held.

* After School Program
Tim Crowley presented a timeline of events leading up to the opening of the YMCA After School Program for K-6 in January 2008. He discussed the politics of entering into this with the YMCA and stated that the YMCA will be responsible for hiring a director and staff, providing materials, billing of parents, etc. The program will follow BTMES policies, VT Child Development Division regulations in regard to after school programs, and offer one scholarship to a student in per year. The school will provide minimal one time start up money that is budgeted from the federal EPSDT grant. Activities, schoolwork, and community service projects will be child directed with YMCA staff support and organization. Tim further explained that after school clubs and activities are in place for students in grades seven and eight. Club leaders’ stipends are also budgeted from the EPSDT grant, while coaches’ stipends are included in the school budget.

The next meeting will be held on Wednesday, November 7 from 8:00-9:30 am in the upstairs conference room. NECAP testing and the relationship to student stress will be included on the agenda.

Respectively Submitted,
Brenda Buzzell, Committee Chair


Barre Town Curriculum and Teacher Support Committee Meeting
Wednesday, September 5, 2007
8:00 AM - 9:30 AM

Board Members: Brenda Buzzell, Chairperson; Laura Moore
Administrators: Paul Moccia, Tim Crowley, Ted Riggen
Teachers: Karen Heath, Shannon Lessley, and Beth Hulburt
Community Members: Kim Canavan, Nancy Pope, Bonnie George

* Local Action Plan
Ted Riggen presented a draft of the Local 2007-2008 Action Plan that was developed this past summer during a two-day retreat of administrators, teachers and a board member at Norwich University He explained that this one-year plan was developed to address the school’s results in the annual NECAP assessment. Specifically, the Action Plan targets:

  • Analysis and interpretation in reading
  • Improvement of academic skills related to constructed responses
  • The development of a program of academic intervention for students who struggle
  • Focus on health

Brenda Buzzell asked that concrete examples of constructed responses especially in analysis and interpretation for grades K-5 be included for the Board’s presentation of the plan. Karen Heath explained these responses to the committee. Nancy Pope questioned how this plan met the needs of high achieving students. Karen spoke to diffentiated instruction to meet all students’ needs and it was noted that this plan was developed to target the areas of improvement that the NECAP demonstrated were specific to Barre Town students.

*Review Procedures for Piloting Math Program K-8
Beth Hulburt explained that the current edition of the Everyday Math Program that is presently being used in the elementary grades will no longer be published after this school year. Their new edition became available for review in February 2007. Although there will be a new version of this program, other programs should be piloted. Barre City has implemented a new math program since their program, Mathland, was discontinued. There was a committee at BC that reviewed programs and piloted units then choose the present program. She proposed the same process at Barre Town for this year. Brenda questioned why BT teachers were not involved in the review process last year and Laura Moore echoed that the efficiency and consistency between schools in a supervisory union is beneficial. Middle school students in both schools already use the same math program. Discussion ensued and the committee agreed that in the future when the curriculum specialist is forming a committee to review programs, representatives from both schools should be present. There was further discussion on the merits of a new program, the financial cost and the timeline to choose a program within budget building time. Beth will continue to report on the progress of a committee and the review of math programs. It was noted that the Finance Committee should have a clear understanding of any program that is included in a budget.

The next meeting will be held on Wednesday, October 3, from 8:00-9:30 am in the upstairs conference room.

Respectively Submitted,
Brenda Buzzell, Committee Chair
Edited by Dr. Paul Moccia, Director of Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment


Barre Town Curriculum and Teacher Support Committee Meeting
Wednesday, June 6, 2007
8:00 AM - 9:30 AM

Board Members: Brenda Buzzell, Chairperson; Laura Moore, David Harrington

Administrators: Paul Moccia, Tim Crowley, Ted Riggen, Tommy Waltz

Teachers: Karen Heath

Community Members: Kim Canavan, Nancy Pope, Bonnie George, Mark Scott, Sandy Cherrier

Student: Nolan Benoit (student principal of the day)

*Tri-State Expectations

Ted Riggen provided all with a copy of an article that went home to parents detailing the development of the Vermont Learning Standards. He explained that these were developed many years ago in Vermont by a large number of people throughout the state. As a result of No Child Left Behind and Act 60, Vermont joined New Hampshire and Rhode Island to create grade level expectations, which reference the VT Framework of Learning Opportunities. Children take the New England Common Assessment Program (NECAP), which assesses these expectations. The committee walked to the main lobby where Ted explained two displays of students’ standard based work in writing and art. These were examples of the process and quality of work by our students to meet or exceed the Vermont standard for the specific grade level.

*Adolescent Literacy Institute

The discussion of standard based work with the use of the NECAP to direct instruction was continued as Karen Heath and Paul Moccia explained a new initiative with Grades Six, Seven, and Eight to address among other skills, analysis and interpretation across the curriculum. The VT READS Institute At The University of Vermont has accepted BTMES into the VT Adolescent Literacy and Learning Institute known as VALLI. This research supported program is a three year commitment that works with Language Arts and content area teachers to help them use and teach specific strategies that successful learners use when confronted with difficult reading material. Committee members received a hand out explaining this program. Mark Scott commented that an organizational structure to allow teachers to disperse this information to their colleagues would be beneficial. Karen and three teachers representing Language Arts, Social Studies and Science will be in the first cohort with the program expanding throughout the three years to other cohorts. Teachers in the cohorts will receive training and modeling of these strategies in their classrooms. They will be able to attend at no charge many other professional development conferences and may receive 1-6 graduate credits from UVM. VALLI is supported through grants at UVM and BTMES’ monetary contribution will be funded through our federal Title II grant.

Nancy Pope inquired about the development of next year’s Action Plan. Ted stated that this would be a two-day process on August 13 and 14 at Norwich University. Laura Moore will attend and Ted invited other interested committee members to also be present these days. The Action Plan will address analysis, interpretation and problem solving skills.

There was a brief discussion on professional development days and the possibility of bringing more professional learning through the monthly teacher meetings.

*After School Committee

Tim Crowley reported on the progress of the YMCA organizing a state licensed after-school program. The YMCA is very knowledgeable and successful with starting and sustaining after school programs in many VT schools. They are hoping for a starting date of January 2008. Brenda Buzzell commented that the YMCA’s Live Y’ers after school programs offer exciting enrichment opportunities as well as physical activities and homework time in the varied established programs of other school districts. Tim explained the next steps including a survey letter to parents. Once a contract with the YMCA is developed, he will bring it to the Finance Committee for review.

Brenda thanked everyone for the commitment and work within the committee this past year.

The next meeting will be held on Wednesday, September 5, 2007 in the second floor conference room at BTMES.

Respectively Submitted,
Brenda Buzzell, Committee Chair
Edited by Dr. Paul Moccia, Director of Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment

 


Barre Town Curriculum and Teacher Support Committee Meeting
Wednesday, May 2, 2007
8:00 AM - 9:30 AM

Board Members: Brenda Buzzell, Chairperson; Laura Moore
Administrators: Paul Moccia, Tim Crowley, Ted Riggen,
Community Members: Kim Canavan, Nancy Pope, Bonnie George, Patty Meriam

Brenda Buzzell called the meeting to order and noted that Mark Scott commented on the minutes of April 4, 2007 concerning the wording” distinction" on NECAP scores as they are reported to parents. He feels that this is misleading and may be sending the wrong message to parents. He would prefer "Highly proficient" or something similar but understands, as Dr. Riggen noted, that we don't control the wording. However, he feels that the public should be able to give serious input to the creators of this evaluation instrument.

*After School Committee

Tim Crowley reported that the after school committee is learning as much as possible about the different after school programs available and the state licensing requirements. At the April 23rd meeting, they heard pertinent information from Ruth Matthews, After school Systems Director, State of Vermont, Child Development Division Lea Hatch, State Licenser, Child Development Division, Ginny Burley, Director, Community Connections, and Tim Rollings, YMCA. At the next meeting, on May 14th, Barbara Christie-Garvin, Coordinator, VOOST & Washington County Youth Service Bureau and Kadie Schaeffer, VT Youth Development Corps will be present to explain their programs. This committee formed following the results from the After School survey that showed many parents were supportive of a licensed after school program. Brenda mentioned that the state has developed core competencies for after school programs and specific trainings for providers who work in after school programs. There are also providers/student ratios, and required hours of trainings for providers in licensed after school programs. The Board has stressed that any program should be a self sustaining program. Tim reported that the YMCA is very interested in coming and starting a program, in which they would take care of the licensing requirements, start up funds, hiring of personnel, etc. He will report as more information becomes available.

C.O.P.S.

Tim stated that the C.O.P.S. (Capitalization, Organization, Punctuation, and Spelling) Initiative would be rolled out to grades 7-8, 5-6 and 4 at assemblies on Friday, May 4th. This pilot, developed with teachers, will start with the fourth quarter of this present year. Students will be accountable for C.O.P.S. on all written work of a paragraph or more in all subject areas by all teachers. Committee members were very receptive of this initiative to promote excellence in all written work.

*Continued Discussion of NECAP Results

Paul Moccia reviewed the results in relation to AYP (Adequate Yearly Progress) and discussed implications of our scores. There was discussion of the “children with disabilities” category. It was noted that disabilities is a wide term that may reflect differently in this sub category of the NECAP. Schools may fail in this one sub category and thus not make AYP even though the other sub categories show passing if not higher scores. A sub category is counted in the AYP score if there are 40 or more children in the specific category. Paul is checking with the two Vermont schools that made AYP in this category and noted that consistency among the teachers’ expectations was one factor that showed positive results. However, it was noted that one of these schools is a Grade 3-5 school as opposed to BTMES K-8 structure.
Paul stated that Karen Heath would report next month on efforts to intervene with adolescent literacy across the curriculum. There are various programs throughout the state to intervene with this age group. She has applied to Vermont READS, which supports analysis and interpretation in all areas. This would carryover into math problem solving abilities. It was further noted that math curriculums are being reviewed as well as a consistent text for Social Sciences.

The next meeting will be held on Wednesday, June 6, 2007 in the second floor conference room at BTMES.

Respectively Submitted,
Brenda Buzzell, Committee Chair
Edited by Dr. Paul Moccia, Director of Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment


Barre Town Curriculum and Teacher Support Committee Meeting
Wednesday, April 4, 2007
8:00 AM - 9:30 AM

Board Members: Brenda Buzzell, Chairperson; Laura Moore

Administrators: Paul Moccia, Tim Crowley, Ted Riggen, Tim Crowley, Tommy Waltz

Community Members: Mark Scott, Sandy Cherrier, Kim Canavan, Sheila Cross, Bonnie George, Patty Meriam, Nancy Pope

Teachers: Barbara Shipman

* Spanish Curriculum

Tim Crowley and Barbara Shipman made a presentation on the format of next year’s Spanish program. Two handouts were distributed. One covered the background of Foreign Languages for previous years and an outline of the goals, challenges, and plans for the new Spanish program. The goal is to integrate Spanish into the daily life of the school. This immersion program will include:

  • School culture: signage with Spanish labels, holidays, buzz words and more

  • Cafeteria food labeled in Spanish

  • Communication between HS students and BTMES Students as “e-pals” and classroom help from high school CSL students

  • Integrating Spanish into library, cafeteria menu, music, and social studies

  • After school Spanish club

  • Speakers on Spanish culture, interaction with Spanish speaking staff

A second handout was an outline of the 7th and 8th grade curriculum using the Realidades Textbook, which is also used in Barre City and Spaulding High School. These students will have Spanish classes three times per week with the goal of entering high school on Level II. Students will also be encouraged to use technology to communicate online with students in other Spanish speaking areas. The high school will be notified that another goal will be to have high achieving Barre Town Spanish students use technology to participate in a high school Spanish class.

* NECAP Review
Paul Moccia, with help from Tommy Waltz, gave a presentation to discuss the NECAP scores for Barre Town. This involved using testing and student profile data to show how it can be useful in focusing on student and teacher needs.
Paul also used a “Pivot Chart” to show how statistical data can be manipulated and useful comparisons made to expose trends in testing results. He discussed our NECAP scores in relation to gender and poverty. He also demonstrated a comparison of a class in two consecutive years. Discussion centered on the use of these scores and the manner in which they can drive professional development.

Paul described some terminology and discussed “Curriculum Mapping” which will used by teachers to layout content, skills, assessments, and resources. Paul’s emphasis was that grouping, schedule, time, and space affect the curriculum. Paul will be piloting the use of new software “Curriculum Mapper” with some science teachers to see how the program can be used as a tool for organizing the curriculum year.

Other issues were raised. Laura Moore questioned how statistics and NECAP results could be used to map teacher success and expose opportunities to identify where support system need to be applied. Brenda Buzzell cautioned that classes may be selected and assigned to a teacher who has success with a specific population of students and that students’ overall growth should be looked at as well as how a class meets assessment results in determining teacher success. She also mentioned that a group of teachers from Barre Town and the SU district had recently attended a conference with Dr. Donald Deshler on adolescent literacy strategies for struggling readers. They also listened to a panel discussion of the many intervention methods that are available to school districts statewide. Nancy Pope questioned how professional development plans are created for teachers. It was agreed that because of the length of discussion that both of theses topics will be on future agendas as will a follow up of Barre Town’s NECAP scores and how they relate to AYP.
The next meeting will be Wednesday May 2, 2007 at 8AM in the upstairs conference room.

Respectfully submitted by Patricia L. Meriam
Edited by Brenda Buzzell, committee chair
and Dr. Paul Moccia, Director of Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment

 


Barre Town Curriculum and Teacher Support Committee Meeting
Wednesday, March 7, 2007
8:00 AM - 9:30 AM

Board Members: Brenda Buzzell, Chairperson; Laura Moore
Administrators: Paul Moccia, Tim Crowley, Ted Riggen, Laurie Gossens, Tommy Waltz
Community Members: Mark Scott, Sandy Cherrier
Teachers: Karen Heath

* Writing Rubric – C.O.P.S.

Tim Crowley mentioned that this will be piloted this fourth quarter. He stated that the challenges to implementation are being addressed. These include:

  • Determination of the final grade using both the subject content and C.O.P.S. (capitalization, organization, punctuation, spelling) rubric

  • Marketing this initiative to students

  • Feedback from teachers and parents

* Reading Binder

Karen Heath presented this binder with copies for members to look at. She reviewed the contents, explaining that teachers in Grades K-3 use this in their Literacy curriculum. It is a combination of self selected and guided reading combined into a readers’ workshop method. The components also include working with words and writing. The method includes a focused lesson on the skill, guided practice on grade level and a chance to apply the skill independently on a student’s own reading level. Discussion of different teaching methods and materials followed. Karen explained that she works individually supporting new teachers and consults with all teachers including this as part of professional development.

Mark Scott commented that the essential principles be distributed as helpful hints to parents at conferences, open house. etc. He described this as practical means for parents to work with their children. Ted and Karen commented that this could be prepared and distributed.

* Reading Intervention Follow-up

Laurie Gossens explained that 12 first grade students began in Reading Recovery, two exited early so that others took their place. The second round has these two students and 10 more. The December, 2006 POA (Primary Observation Assessment) Results for Kindergarten, Grades One, and Grade Two were reviewed. Brenda Buzzell asked if we are using our resources for reading intervention to best serve the students in all grades who are in need of help. NECAP scores were discussed in relation to reading intervention. Sandy Cherrier questioned comprehension intervention in the middle school. Laurie pointed out that we presently have no funds to have a formal reading intervention program in other grades. Paul Moccia stated that the scores for skills were being segregated so that direct instruction would be tailored to help students. There was discussion of reading intervention on all levels. The committee recognizes the benefits of one to one intervention, but stressed the need to reach out to all. Teacher training was discussed.

The next meeting will be Wednesday, April 4, 2007 from 8-9:30 AM in the Barre Town second floor conference room.

Respectfully submitted by Brenda Buzzell, Committee Chair
Edited by Dr. Paul Moccia, Director of Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment

 


Barre Town Curriculum and Teacher Support Committee Meeting
Wednesday, February 7, 2007
8:00 AM - 9:30 AM

Board Members: Brenda Buzzell, Chairperson; Laura Moore
Administrators: Paul Moccia, Tim Crowley, Ted Riggen
Community Members: Mark Scott, Kim Canavan, Nancy Pope, Patty Meriam, Bonnie George
Teachers: Karen Heath, Dianna Martel, Mollie Smith, Debbie Fontes

* Spelling for Writers Program
A presentation was made by, Dianna Martel (4th grade), and Mollie Smith (4th grade) who are piloting the “Spelling for Writers” program with their students. They explained that this program teaches word patterns, such as long vowels with ae, ai and silent e., as well as including challenging words for individual abilities. This new program encourages the use of the dictionary, word sort, and word use in weekly writing assignments. Karen Heath explained that this program is being piloted as teachers in grades 3-6 have been using either Houghton-Muffin or Scholastic. Paul Moccia said an academic year was a reasonable amount of time to spend evaluating the program. Members discussed the need for consistency within grade levels so when students merge into the next grade level there will be equity.

Tim Crowley explained how he is working with staff to develop a system for students in the middle school to be accountable for their grammar and mechanics on all written assignments of a paragraph or more in all academic areas. COPS is a checklist that students will use to assess their capitalization, organization, punctuation and spelling of all courses. He discussed finding a balance between teacher preferences and consistency for students.

*Teaching American History Grant Proposal
Paul Moccia discussed a district grant, “Teaching American History”, for $75-100K, for teachers of social studies and history in grades 3-12, to support professional development. The grant supports book discussions and a summer institute for teachers to learn about history from primary sources. The grant will start in January 2008. Teachers will also be able to receive three graduate level credits. Many committee members spoke in favor of the grant proposal.

*Wellness: Nutrition and Fitness Policy
Policy Committee has sent several items from the Wellness Policy for Curriculum to review. Please refer to draft copy of Wellness Policy.(date?)
-II Fitness, “Goals for Physical Fitness”, #4, Curriculum Committee (CC) agrees in spirit that this in the best interest of the whole child but would like to refer it on to Finance Committee for funding and licensing rules.
-B, “Instructional Program Guidelines, #1, CC would like to see this moved to Fitness, A, and become number 5. appending it with” [school students], including opportunities outside the normal school day.”
-D, “Curriculum Guidelines”, CC accepts 1-5 without change.

Laura Moore requested the CC additionally review B,” Instructional Program Guidelines”, #4. CC added the word “regularly” so it reads “ No child may be removed regularly from recess for more than 10 minutes for academic reasons.”

Minutes of Jan 3 meeting were discussed. Patty raised her objections as expressed in her 1-8-07 email to the committee. The CC agreed to make the changes as specified, with the addition of removing the paragraph that stated a “consensus was reached…”

The remainder of the agenda, the Reading Binder, was tabled.

The next meeting will be Wednesday, March 7, 2007 from 8-9:30 AM in the Barre Town second floor conference room.

Respectfully submitted by Patricia L. Meriam, Recorder
Edited by Brenda Buzzell, Committee Chair and Dr. Paul Moccia, Director of Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment


Barre Town Curriculum and Teacher Support Committee Meeting
Wednesday, January 3, 2007

8:00 AM - 9:30 AM
Amended Minutes

Board Members: Brenda Buzzell, Chairperson; Laura Moore, David Harrington
Administrators: Paul Moccia, Tim Crowley, Tommy Walz
Community Members: Mark Scott, Kim Canavan, Nancy Pope, Patty Meriam, Jim Cross
Teachers: Karen Heath, Beth Hulbert

* Reading Assessments
Karen Heath Explained that the Primary Observation Assessment (POA) and Developmental Reading Assessment (DRA) are the assessments being used in the early grades and that there is improvement in these scores with the impact of Early Literacy Initiatives. She stated that Grade Three was using a grade level assessment and that there has not been a formal, consistent, and uniform assessment of reading skills in Grades 4-8. As a result, this year two screening tools have been implemented in grades 3-8. The Gates/MacGinitie assesses vocabulary and reading comprehension and is a group test. The Timothy Rasinki and Nancy Padak, “3 Minute Reading Assessment” screens for fluency and oral retell, including main idea, sequencing, and listening skills. This screening tool is administered to all students in grades 3-6 and to selected students in grades 7-8, dependent upon teacher concerns.

* Review of proposed budget and discussion of Foreign Language
Brenda explained the School Board’s rationale for eliminating Foreign Language from the 2007-08 Budget. This included information that is in the Board’s minutes from the December 13 Meeting and can be found on the BTMES website.
The committee received the Characteristics of Effective Elementary School Foreign Language Programs as described by the American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Language and also the 14 Board Questions concerning curriculum. Brenda stated that all Board members recognized the value of learning another language and this decision that was not made lightly and without research and consideration of our students. David Harrington gave a history of the recent parental issues that have impacted the Board as budgets have been built. These included class size, lack of transportation, full day kindergarten, and the federal and state mandates. He stated that the Board struggles with the economic balance. Laura Moore stated that with the less flexibility in building budgets, the Board was determined not to erode programs by cutting from each. Nancy Pope read her letter in strong support of foreign languages, urging the Board to present a budget to the community that included foreign language with the explanation that this would be eliminated if the budget were defeated. There was discussion of the present foreign language program, including its’ inception and progression to our present program. It was noted that foreign language was introduced ten years ago and has cost one million dollars while other academic programs have taken twenty years to spend that amount of money. Patty Meriam stressed the value of learning foreign languages in our global economy. Paul Moccia noted that Barre Town along with other schools need to raise our basic standards in Language Arts, Math and Science in order to compete in an international world.

The remainder of the agenda, the Reading Binder and the Spelling for Writer’s Program, was tabled.

The next meeting will be Wednesday, February 7, 2007 from 8-9:30 AM in the Barre Town second floor conference room.

Respectfully Submitted, Brenda Buzzell, Committee Chair

 


Barre Town Curriculum and Teacher Support Committee Meeting
Wednesday, December 6, 2006

Board Members: Brenda Buzzell, Chairperson; Laura Moore
Administrators: Paul Moccia, Tim Crowley, Ted Riggen, Tommy Walz
Community Members: Mark Scott, Bonnie George, Sheila Cross, Kim Canavan
Teachers: Karen Heath

* Literacy Council
Karen Heath reported on the history of the Literacy Council, which is made up of administrators and K-8 teachers from Barre City and Barre Town. This council began in 1999 with a Reading Initiative grant. It has expanded from K-3 to now include all grade levels. Quarterly meetings are held at the elementary (K-4) and middle (5-8) levels. The council’s role is advisory as to reporting on literacy issues, reviewing curriculum and examining instructional strategies as it reviews assessments. Mark suggested that the management team (administrators/language specialist) should be responsible for distributing information from the Literacy Council in written form to all teachers who could then approach their grade representative for questions and /or concerns. Brenda commented that the Central Vermont Early Childhood Council, Success by Six team is very active in our community and asked if they may be approached to have a representative attend Literacy Council meetings. It was noted that Tina Grant, a BTMES para educator, is co-coordinator of the Barre area Success By Six Team. Others from our school community are members of the team and also attend Early Childhood Council meetings. Karen will make the contact.

There was discussion of the present Literacy programs in our school. It was noted that Grades 4-8, use the Houghton-Mifflin Program, while grades K-3 are objective driven and have a Literacy Notebook and the Pinnel and Fountas phonics. Pinnel and Fountas phonics is also used on the elementary level. Committee members were in consensus that it is crucial to have a basic guideline of specific skills in each grades for every teacher to work from. We will examine our reading program in depth at a future meeting.

Tim introduced his plan for insuring student accountability in writing for grades 5-8. This will be a list of criteria that each student will self check on written work in any subject area. The criteria will include organization, presentation, sentence structure and capitalization. The teacher will also check for these criteria and a separate grade will be given for content and for writing mechanics. It was noted that national research shows that students are lacking basic writing skills. This is a means to insure that skills students learn in Language Arts are carried across the curriculum. A different format will be created for the elementary grades so that students’ efforts in writing will be consistent.

* Spelling Think Tank
It was noted that all teachers were surveyed concerning spelling instruction. Committee parents also commented on the inconsistency of the spelling programs by grade levels and within grade levels. Karen stated that Spelling and Word Study Approaches should be characterized by developmentally appropriate explicit instruction. She also mentioned that this instruction should be differentiated according to individual students’ needs based on assessment.
Currently K-2 is exploring Pinnel and Fountes word work along with continuing to use Cast-a-Spell. Grades 3-5 are using Spelling Mastery with other teachers using different programs. Two 4th grades teachers will pilot Spelling for Writers, which has proven success. Grades 6-8 still had students who need direct instruction in spelling patterns, while others are ready for more word study and vocabulary programs. The committee agreed that spelling skills should be consistent within each grade level and that there be a consistent progression from one grade to another. They recognize that phonics; along with basic spelling patterns will build and strengthen skills as opposed to memorizing word lists. This will continue to be examined at future meetings.

The next meeting will be Wednesday, January 3, 2007 from 8-9:30 AM in the Barre Town second floor conference room.

Respectfully Submitted, Brenda Buzzell, Committee Chair


 


Barre Town Curriculum and Teacher Support Committee Meeting
Wednesday, November 1, 2006

Board Members: Brenda Buzzell, Chairperson; Laura Moore
Administrators: Paul Moccia, Tim Crowley, Ted Riggen, Laurie Gossens, Tommy Walz
Community Members: Nancy Pope, Mark Scott, Bonnie George
Teachers: Susan Barnard, Jesse Shapiro, Karen Heath, Deb Fontes
Recorder: Sherrie Clark, BSU

* Freshman Academy - Jeffrey Maher
Jeffrey discussed the Freshman Academy as “a balanced program that stimulates intellectual curiosity, requires students to demonstrate that they have learned how to learn, and enables them to become productive and effective citizens”. He explained the reasons to implement this project for Fall of 2007. Data collected from past years demonstrates that freshman have a high failure rate. It is documented that this is a big transition year. There are a core group of 32 high school teachers who have volunteered to be a part of the Freshman Academy. All have taken the graduate level class titled “Skillful Teacher” and are committed to the success of the project with the real emphasis being on differentiated instruction. Nancy Pope asked.

“ What will be different next Fall?” Jeffrey sited an example in the literacy proponent. He explained that all students would encounter argumentative literacy across the classes. Teachers will be consistent in their approach and the messages that they are giving students. Students will be held to accountable standards in all classes with the teachers meeting regularly to determine the best approach. Mark Scott stated that he would like to see some charts on the goals of this group. He said that some of his high school kids’ teachers are sending progress reports electronically on a weekly basis and he feels that this is wonderful.

Tim Crowley stated that colleges are using the freshman academy approach. He also reiterated that this approach is being used at Barre Town in our middle school to encourage all students to be successful. Teachers meet regularly to review the progress of students and also encourage parent involvement.

Karen Heath asked how the specialists could be helpful. Jeffrey said that they would be part of the planning process. The next staff development days will be used for planning time for the committee.

Ted commented that this Freshman Academy might involve more planning and communicating between the sending schools and the high school.

* SHAC Grant Proposal - Susan Barnard & Jesse Shapiro
Susan explained the “Farm to School Grant” which is a result of Act 145(2006) and is available to help Vermont schools develop relationships with local farmers and producers. Schools may apply to receive up to
$15,000.00. The cost of a grant-writer will be $250.00 which Tim Crowley said there was money for already.
The food would be organically grown and support our school nutrition policy. She mentioned that the Farm to Table organization transports food with no gas mileage expense and will provide it at cost as part of this program. The grant will allow support to the Abbey Group, which is our Food Service to explore the possibility of using local food in the food service program, along with supporting the local economy. Scott at the Abbey Group who provides lunches is very excited about this, as are the parents and other members of the committee looking at this grant. Mark Scott suggested that part of the grant money should be used to do a cost analysis of the sustainability of the program, along with making parents aware of the program. The grant deadline is December 1st. Brenda Buzzell will present this proposal to the Finance Committee for approval.

* Barre Town Action Plan - Ted, Laurie, Tim
The committee examined the Action Plan. Ted explained the specific areas of concern
that have been identified by the administration and school board that are in need of focus.:

  • state-assessed needs of children of poverty, particularly in the areas of reading, writing, and mathematics;

  • improving teaching to meet the needs of all students

  • Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report from the State showing that Barre Town as deficit in the disaggregated subgroup of students receiving special education.

Committee members had received the plan before the meeting and recognized that although this is the focus of the plan, all students will be supported and encouraged to attain academic success.

Karen Heath mentioned that the coordinated spelling instruction piece was left out of the action plan. She did a survey and has the results of how teachers are teaching spelling in the lower grades. She will be meeting with two consultants next week to look at the surveys. They will draft a proposal for how to teach spelling in the classroom in a consistent manner. She will report the results back to this committee.

* Reading & Recovery Intervention Program - Paul Moccia
Paul invited committee members to go on site visits to other schools to look at their reading intervention programs, including but not limited to Reading Recovery. A couple of people said they were interested. Paul will call some of the members who were not able to attend today’s meeting to see if they are interested. Brenda asked if examining reading intervention programs and reflecting on our reading data could be a part of the Literacy Council work. Karen Heath will look into this.

Members commented that appreciated receiving information pertinent to today’s meeting through e mail. Brenda thanked Sherri for sending this electronically to all committee members.

The next meeting will be Wednesday, December 6, 2006 from 8-9:30 AM in the Barre Town second floor conference room.

Respectfully Submitted, Sherrie L. Clark, BSU Office
Edited by Brenda Buzzell, Committee Chair

 


Barre Town Curriculum and Teacher Support Committee Meeting
Wednesday, October 4, 2006

Board Members: Brenda Buzzell, Chairperson; Laura Moore,
Administrators: Paul Moccia, Tim Crowley, Ted Riggen, Laurie Gossens, Tommy Walz
Community Members: Kim Canavan, Nancy Pope, Sheila Cross, Mark Scott
Teachers: Susan Barnard
Recorder: Sherrie Clark, BSU

* Update on September POA Results - Laurie Gossens

Kindergarten - Letter ID

Score: 57% exceeded standards (55 students)
28% met standards (27 students)
8% did not meet standards (14 students)

Grade 1

Score: 94% met or exceeded the Text Level
6% did not meet the Text Level
89% met or exceeded the Writing Vocabulary
89% met or exceeded the Sentence Dictation
75% met or exceeded on the OHIO Word Test
25% did not meet standards

Grade 2

Score: 90% met or exceeded the Text Level
10% did not meet standards
85% met or exceeded the Writing Words (dictated paragraph)
14% did not meet the standard

Twelve students are scheduled to begin Reading & Recovery. When 20 weeks are up, it is determined if there are another 12 students who need it. Students exit when they meet the requirements. Some exit sooner than the 20 weeks. Brenda reminded the committee of the Board’s goal to provide support so that all children succeed. (90/90/90). The committee questioned whether intervention is serving the greatest need, as Reading Recovery is only a first grade intervention program. Tracking has been done and Tommy Walz will try to find out how children who slipped back in reading skills in the other elementary grades performed in the 1st grade. The question was raised: Can we do something with the present intervention money to make a difference? - Where should priority be for 2nd round for all grades? This needs to be answered/addressed as the budget is being prepared for 2007-2008.

Laurie explained the language of the levels of support: Tier 1 - classroom support, direct instruction, Tier 2 - pullout or more of what’s in regular classroom. Reading & Recovery is supplemental to the classroom as it is a more intense level of instruction outside the classroom, and Tier 3 - special ed.

* School Improvement Conference - Laurie Gossens & Ted Riggen
Laurie Gossens, Paul Moccia, Ted Riggen, and Jesse Shapiro attended this conference because Barre Town School was targeted along with many other schools in the State who did not meet Annual Yearly Progress (AYP) in the category of Students with Disabilities. This was a sharing conference with other professionals. There are two more meetings, one in December and another in April. At this time all are reading the book “Breakthrough” by Michael Fullan. Discussion is centered on direct classroom teaching in meeting the needs of this population of students. The specialists need to be working in the classes with the teachers to see how the kids are doing. Nancy Pope questioned why the teachers did not have a profile of their student’s academic strengths and weaknesses at the beginning of each school year. Tim Crowley suggested that with our technology this could be easily done. Committee members agreed that an academic profile would make sense as teachers could adapt the curriculum to the needs of each class more efficiently. This would be a one-page profile of each student’s academic strengths and weaknesses as determined by the NECAP scores. It would not contain subjective comments.

* Physical Education - Update on New Bikes in Curriculum - Sue Barnard
The Wellness Policy in respect to curriculum will be addressed at the following Policy Committee meetings: October 24th and November 28th at 6:00 p.m. in the Bare Town Second Floor Conference Room.
It was suggested that the Fitness gram Data should be included in the Barre Town Report. Sue will see Tommy for help on that.

Sue reported that Grades 6, 7, and 8 will include biking on the new bike path as part of the Physical Education Program for this Fall and Grade 5 will participate in the Spring. She has secured many federal and state grants to fund this program. Fifteen new bikes have been ordered at $218.00 each through Pierre Couture. Pete Richardson will put these together for $25.00/piece. The school will have a total of thirty-five bikes. Phil Joyal will conduct an after school activity on bike riding. Bike Storage was an issue, however, things were moved/changed and they are now to the right of the stage.

A bike stand was purchased with a grant from EPSDT (a state program for health related activities). There was also $1500.00 from a Safe Routes to School grant. The Bike-A-Thon raise $3,000.00, donations from the Kiwanis ($1,000.00) and Rotary($1,000.00) clubs and other state grants have all contributed to the biking program. Some money will be used to purchase more helmets and other monies will be reserved for repairs.

First grades and multi grades will walk the Bike Path to the Rock of Ages Visitors Center this Friday for the International Walk to School Day. They will picnic, enjoy apples and the accordion music of Irene Brown before walking back to school. The rain date is April 13th.

Ted Riggen reported that composting is being done mercilessly -- there has been approximately 3,300 pounds of it collected this school year.

* Agenda Items for 2006-07
Committee members decided that these items would be a priority for agenda items:

Middle School –Goals, Issues – how are we educating the whole child in relation to academics and our present culture?
Outdoor classroom - How has our science specialist with the help of Paul and teachers adapted curriculum to our extended land, including wetland?

Committee members would like to receive any reports /information to be discussed ahead of time so that
they can come prepared for the meeting. Brenda will discuss this with Paul.

The next meeting will be Wednesday, November 1st from 8-9:30AM in the second floor conference room.

Respectfully Submitted,

Sherrie L. Clark, BSU Office
Edited by Brenda Buzzell, Committee Chair

 


Barre Town Curriculum and Teacher Support Committee Meeting
Wednesday, September 6, 2006

Board Members: Brenda Buzzell, Chairperson; Laura Moore
Administrators: Paul Moccia, Tim Crowley, Ted Riggen
Community Members: Kim Canavan, Nancy Pope, Sheila Cross, Bonnie George
Recorder: Sherrie Clark, BSU

* First Week of School Report - Ted Riggen & Tim Crowley
The first week of school went very well. All was calm with the exception of mechanical problems with the buses and personnel issues for bus staffing. Work has been done in reconfiguring the school for a new classroom. Housecleaning is being done and storage areas reorganized. New teacher orientation went well. There are 911 kids enrolled thus far; down 5 from last year.

Staff meetings are now 1.5 hours and they have been scheduled for the whole year with the schedule posted on the website. Mini trainings have been added using Tech staff. These trainings will be held monthly for 15-30 minutes. New policies will be presented and explained to the staff at these meetings. The media policy was discussed yesterday. Staff has been asked to show evidence explaining their goal when briefing parents before they put on an event.

Brenda Buzzell requested a copy of the handbook for Board members who do not have children in school.
Everyone in the building has been trained in composting. On September 11th staff will be introduced to the goal of 40,000 lb of composting.

The parent/student meetings prior to school went very well. Grades 5-8 were scheduled for one night to accommodate parents with children in multiple grades. They had a 95% turnout of families. It was also the first year that Grade 4 held a Parent Night Tim told parents/students that the written response to literature (25 book standard) must be done in their very best writing composition. The teachers are aware of this and will not accept anything but their best. The Board has asked for our school to model the 90/90/90 Project to promote success for all students.

* Technology Curriculum - Tim Crowley
Tim handed out a copy of what was given to parents of Grade 8 Technology Education students. It was composed by Ann Murphy who is assisting Michael Wetherell. Michael is filling in as the Technology Education teacher until a permanent licensed teacher is found. He is very willing to work when and as long as he is needed. This is a difficult position to fill, as there are not many colleges that offer this discipline. There are no other candidates in the State of Vermont due to the fact that Vermont colleges don’t teach it. Tim had recruited, with no luck, at out-of-state colleges that offered this degree. Nancy Pope suggested calling Columbia’s Teachers College because they specialize in teaching Technology Education and some candidates may graduate in January. Tim will follow-up on this.

* Crops by Kids - Paul Moccia
The group met on August 30th. Bryn Mawr received three FLY Pentop Computers 1 and these will be raffled off on September 9th. Lowe’s provided a $2,300.00 grant, a $250.00 check came from Burlington Gardens, and $600.00 has been raised. Fund raising will continue. The garden’s harvest will be promoted this Saturday, September 9th at the Bike Path Opening Ceremony. Brenda suggested an article in the Times Argus under Talk of the Town section. Paul will check into this. Paul, Ellen Sulek and Deanna Bailey are developing some concrete ideas for the garden as it pertains to school grades. It was suggested that a looping of grades for planting and harvesting so that a group of children experience the garden from start to finish.

* AYP Update - Paul Moccia
Paul went over the slide presentation that he will present to the Board. He explained the different groups and their score and the goals. On September 28, he and others from our school will be attending the School Improvement Conference as directed by the State. Every effort will be made to find out how other schools have made AYP in the area of Students with Disabilities. There will be a report at the October 4, 2006 meeting on how Barre Town can make AYP in the category of Students with Disabilities.

* Wellness Policy Review - Brenda Buzzell
The Board has asked the Curriculum Committee to look at the language of the Curriculum Guidelines of the Wellness/Nutrition Policy. In doing so, it was noted that some people had older versions and others have the pared down version. Following discussion of the various policies on hand, it was decided to ask the School Wellness Committee who have spearheaded this initiative to give us an updated draft with specifics for the curriculum committee.

The next meeting will be Wednesday, October 4, 2006 from 8-9:30AM in the Barre Town upstairs conference room.

Respectfully Submitted, Sherrie L. Clark, BSU Office
Edited by Brenda Buzzell, Committee Chair

 


Barre Town Curriculum and Teacher Support Committee Meeting
Wednesday, June 7, 2006
8:00 AM - 9:30 AM

Board Members: Brenda Buzzell, Chairperson; Laura Moore
Administrators: Paul Moccia, Tim Crowley, Tommy Waltz, Laurie Gossens, Ted Riggen
Community Members: Kim Canavan, Cathy Hilgendorf, Patty Merriam
Teachers: Karen Heath, Laura Thygesen, Martha Ide, Susan Barnard
Recorder: Sherrie Clark, BSU

Brenda thanked all members present and those unable to attend today for their dedication and time commitment to this school year’s committee.

* Wellness Policy As It Relates to Curriculum - Sue Barnard & Martha Ide
Martha Ide and Susan Barnard spoke about the Wellness Policy explaining that schools must look at the wellness, nutrition and fitness policies and guidelines. The Policy Committee has divided the proposed Wellness Policy into related committee areas. Our committee discussed Physical Fitness/Education/Activities, Instructional Program Guidelines, and Curriculum Guidelines. Overall the committee supports the guidelines as presented and Brenda will share their concerns at the Board Summer Retreat. The Before and After School Programs were discussed briefly in conjunction with a state licensed school age program so that all children will have equal access to all activities. Tim and /or a committee will follow up with Ruth Matthews, After School Program Consultant with the State Department of Children and Families. The rest of the discussion was tabled due to lack of information and time constraints. The following from the proposed Wellness Policy were the points of discussion:

  1. BTMES shall provide a comprehensive physical education program that promotes moderate to vigorous physical activity on a daily basis, as well as, daily recreation periods (regardless of weather) that allow for physical activity in a supervised setting. Physical education and activity programs shall meet the need and interest of all students irrespective of their sex, race/ethnicity, health status, and disabilities.

  2. To the extent practical, BTMES shall provide other physical activity opportunities for students through recess periods and, as appropriate, before and after school activities such as interscholastic athletics and physical activity clubs or intramural sports.

Goals for Instructional Program Guidelines:

  1. We will strive to meet the National Association for Sports and Physical Education recommendations which suggest a minimum of 150 minutes per week of elementary school students and 225 minutes per week for middle and high school students.

  2. K-8 will have a five minute teacher directed activity session approximately every hour within the classroom.

  3. Class size for physical education should coincide with school policy. Physical education class size will be equivalent to a classroom teacher.

  4. No child may be removed from physical education class or recess for other academic or behavior issues, unless the behavior is directly related to the physical education class or recess.

Goals for Curriculum Guidelines:

  1. Recess will occur before lunch.

  2. Adequate supervision will be provided at recess to ensure the safety of all children. Training shall be provided for all faculty/staff assigned to recess duty.

* POA & DRA Results - Implications to Reading Intervention Program
Paul Moccia handed out some comparisons for May, 2005 and May, 2006. He explained the different charts and what they mean. There was a lot of discussion pertaining to Reading Recovery and how/why some students did/did not meet the state standards. Reading Recovery is in place for the school year 06-07, but Laurie emphasized that if there is not as much need demonstrated by the first grade class, the teachers will intervene with other elementary grade children in need of reading intervention. Brenda asked that the committee continues to consider all the elementary children and if another program might reach into not only first grade, but also second and third grades at the same or a lesser cost. It was suggested that there is a great need to follow the present kindergarten class and future classes as they progress to determine where reading intervention will be most effective.

* Next Meeting:
The next meeting will be on Wednesday, September 6, 2006 at 8:00 a.m. Have a great summer!

Respectfully Submitted, Sherrie L. Clark, Barre Supervisory Union Office

Edited by, Brenda Buzzell, Committee Chair

 


Barre Town Curriculum and Teacher Support Committee Meeting
Wednesday, May 3, 2006
8:00 AM - 9:30 AM

Board Members: Brenda Buzzell, Laura Moore
Administrators: Paul Moccia, Tim Crowley, Tommy Waltz, Laurie Gossens
Community Members: Kim Canavan, Nancy Pope
Teachers: Karen Heath, Phyllis Wiggins, Jesse Shapiro, Andrea McLaughlin
Recorder: Sherrie Clark, BSU

* Garden Project Update - Paul Moccia
Paul attended meetings for this community imitative re: fundraising, equipment to get the garden going.
Saturday, April 29th community members were out working on the garden. A grant for $250.00 was secured for compost and fencing. Another $500.00 was given for wood and seeds with other donations provided by community members. The garden will be used for the upcoming Fall/Harvest Festival, which a committee is developing. Produce that is grown may be used for taste testing and by the Abbey Group for lunches. The goal is to have students with their parents volunteer to maintain the garden throughout the summer months.

* Reading Recovery Research Results - Paul Moccia & Laurie Gossens
Paul and Laurie presented a table graph comparing different reading programs along with our present Reading Recovery program. The programs compared met the five components of effective reading, had costs associated with them and some could be only reading intervention programs that targeted children other than only first grade students. Much discussion followed. The committee charged Paul and Laurie to examine the upcoming Primary Observation Assessment (POA) and Developmental Reading Assessment (DRA) scores to determine where in grades one through three reading intervention should be delivered. They were also asked to determine how services could be best delivered using our present reading intervention staff and resources. They will report back at the June meeting.

* Technology Curriculum & Ethics Update - Tim Crowley
Tim presented a PowerPoint explanation of the proposed Technology Education proposal for sixth grade. He feels the students need to be more aware of safety when using the Internet. The proposal will keep what is valued in the present Tech-Ed curriculum and replace other parts with instruction on using the Internet appropriately. He proposes to connect technology with the core curriculum in math and science. This curriculum will also be expanded for the seventh and eighth grade. Students now receive thirty-six classes per year that are divided into a number of weeks per unit of study. The new curriculum would consolidate the information in the present units to allow time to teach appropriate use of the Internet incorporating approved technology curriculums. Two curriculums being considered are Cybersmart and iSAFE. If any costs accompany either of these curriculums, the proposal will be brought to the Finance Committee.

The next meeting will be Wednesday, June 7, 2006 in the Barre Town School 2nd Floor Conference Room from 8:00-9:30 AM.

Respectfully Submitted, Sherrie L. Clark, Barre Supervisory Union Office


Barre Town Curriculum and Teacher Support Committee Meeting
Wednesday, April 5, 2006
8:00 AM - 9:30 AM

Board Members: Brenda Buzzell, Laura Moore
Administrators: Paul Moccia, Tim Crowley, Tommy Waltz, Laurie Gossens, Ted Riggen
Community Members: Sheila Cross, Kim Canavan, Mark Scott
Recorder: Sherrie Clark, BSU

* Reading Recovery Follow-Up - Paul Moccia & Laurie Gossens
Paul and Laurie presented an update on the research that is being done comparing our present Reading Recovery intervention program with nine other programs. They along with our three Reading Recovery teachers are using a matrix to compare programs. Paul has also talked with two consultants from the Department of Education who are well versed in these programs. Brenda reminded all that we are seeking to find a cost efficient intervention program that will meet the needs of any elementary grade student as opposed to our present program, which targets only first graders and does not have an emphasis on comprehension skills. Paul and Laurie are hoping to finalize results for the May meeting.

* NECAP Results - Paul Moccia
Students grade 3-8 were tested in reading, math and writing. The State Department has sent a summary of the test results to all school last week. Barre Town students ranked in the top third of the state in all three subject areas. Individual student scores will go home with the students’ report cards. Paul and Tom Walz are analyzing the data and will present the results to the board in May, placing emphasis on poor students, school size and how they performed at the two top levels. At this time they are only drawing impressions, not conclusions. The AYP results may be out by the end of April. The committee received a Handout - Info Brief (The Achievement Gap). The administration will be looking at test results and using that information to develop the action plan. Laura asked, “What are we doing for those students scoring very high?” Are we doing anything to encourage them? The committee briefly discussed programs in place to challenge students. This topic will be placed on a future agenda to determine how our school challenges and encourages students who meet or exceed the standard.

* Technology Curriculum & Ethics Update - Tim Crowley
Tim created and showed a PowerPoint presentation of his vision for technology using the K-8 Cybersmart Curriculum. This is a no cost program that has the support of many organizations, including the VT School Board Association. He feels that grades six, seven and eight should move from the present Technology Education curriculum to a Technology Exploration curriculum that includes direct instruction in technology. This includes: research, advertising, manners, and safety. This instruction would concern cyberspace - what exactly is it, search engines and directories, searching and making search decisions, evaluation of web sites, how to cite a site, advertising, privacy, cyber citizenship, respecting the law, computer ethics, netiquette. All of these are listed on the site CyberSmart.org. He feels that kids need to learn the wonders of the Internet along with the evils and be prepared to use the Internet appropriately as they enter high school. He hopes to implement a program in the fall and visions hiring someone who could work cooperatively with the math and science teachers in bringing to life an aspect of their curriculum. He would also like to see science and math fairs and competition on a state level. There should be very little cost to this project.

Tom Walz added that he feels that this type of program should start for younger grades for every teacher and every student. Tim will present an outline of the curriculum for grades six, seven and eight for the next meeting preserving what we need in our present Tech Ed curriculum and replacing other parts with direct instruction in Tech Exploration.

The next meeting will be Wednesday, May 3, 2006 in the Barre Town School 2nd Floor Conference Room from 8:00-9:30 AM.

Respectfully Submitted,  Sherrie L. Clark, Barre Supervisory Union Office


Barre Town Curriculum and Teacher Support Committee Meeting
Wednesday, March 8, 2006
8:00 AM - 9:30 AM

Board Members: Brenda Buzzell
Administrators: Paul Moccia, Tim Crowley, Tommy Waltz
Community Members: Sheila Cross, Kim Canavan
Teachers: Deanna Bailey
Presenters: Rob Stalling & Lauren Demers, BSU Tech Team
Recorder: Sherrie Clark, BSU

* Follow-Up on Budget Vote - Brenda Buzzell
Brenda said that more than 21% of registered voters approved the Barre Town budget by 153 votes. She stated that the Board is very appreciative of the confidence and support from the town voters. All were pleased.

* Report Card Technology - Lauren Demers & Rob Stalling (Tech Team)
Grades K-12 are using electronic report cards. Grades 6-8 have been using an electronic card with comments for 12 or so years. These grades also have been doing progress reports electronically. Rob demonstrated the 3 steps it takes to go into the SMS (Student Management System) report card system. Step 1: sign on to SMS system. Step 2: Click on the homeroom roster to view list, grading and attendance lists. Step 3: type in grade. The tech staff feels it is a simple procedure and takes about 20 minutes to record grades for a class of 25 students. Sheila mentioned that teachers cannot record grades at home. Brenda and Paul compared this system to others that have security issues and yet personnel still work from home. Rob and Lauren explained issues of confidentiality, different connection speeds, computer compatibility and security reasons are the concerns of the tech team. Rob also stated that there wouldn’t be any tech support for teachers at home, their computers may not be upgraded enough to handle the program, and/or there may be computer viruses and that could damage the SMS system. Lauren explained that SMS has a similar program called Gradebook that teachers can use to enter the information at home and then bring it school on a disk. Paul and the Tech Team staggered report card input dates so that not everyone is using the system at the same time. Rob stated that working with the SMS system in year #1 was very difficult but we are now in year #2 and some of the issues have been eliminated or reduced. The Chancery Company has put their entire resources into the SMS system and they do not want to fail either. Since August, 2004 there have been 52 releases/updates to this system. Our district has upgraded 11 times (software, hardware, documentation).

Brenda asked if Barre Town staff could start e-mailing the school bulletin daily instead of making so many copies for everybody. They will start doing that.

* Deanna Bailey
Deanna announced that we have been awarded a Science Partnership Grant to help improve the teaching of science. The grant was through the Vermont Science Initiative. There will be a weeklong focused training July 31 - August 4th at UVM. This training will focus on methods to develop the watershed relating to all aspects of environmental science. This incorporates something for every teacher. During 2006-07, a course will be presented for one month by Deanna. She will take what she has learned and integrate it. There will also be a one week follow-up. This will be open to all Vermont teachers. There are 40 slots to fill and we have been allotted 20 of those slots for K-8 teachers. Deanna has already spoken to some teachers and they have expressed interest. Next year will target grades K-12. This course will be for 6 graduate credits. Also each teacher will receive $700 toward materials for their classroom. Deanna is advertising this and will be meeting individually with teachers to encourage them.

Brenda congratulated Deanna for bringing this grant to our district and commented that this information with a picture should be sent to the Times Argus and the WORLD. Deanna and Tim agreed and will follow up on this.

* Follow-Up on the Garden - Paul Moccia
Two presentations were made at the faculty meeting on how teachers used the garden in the past. There was a sign-up sheet for use and now is a good time to get it started. There is about 20% participation from the teachers in this project.

* How Technology is Being Integrated into the Curriculum - Tommy Walz
A presentation was given by Tommy Walz. There were two key questions: What is it? How do we measure it? Tommy’s Answer: Using technology as a tool to collect, manipulate, and disseminate information within the context of the curriculum. He also mentioned that all grades are aligned to the grade level expectations.

Brenda asked how the school regulates web sites. Tom answered sites such as MySpace.com are blocked. Technology allows for some sites to be automatically blocked while others are blocked as the tech team learns about them. This is why adult supervision is always present when students are using computers.

Sheila stated that parents would like to know what their children are doing with computers. Brenda suggested a specific Technology Open House, or at Parents’ night, etc. Students’ work could be exhibited and the computers available for students to show their parents what they do when using them. Tommy said he was considering this based on a model night from years ago. All agreed it was a good idea.

Tim brought up that we should consider re-evaluating the Tech Ed course. It may need redefining and incorporating ethics into which sites are acceptable/helpful to students. Discussion will continue on this.

The next meeting will be Wednesday, April 5, 2006 in the Barre Town School 2nd Floor Conference Room from 8:00-9:30 AM.

Respectfully Submitted, Sherrie L. Clark, Barre Supervisory Union Office


Barre Town Curriculum and Teacher Support Committee Meeting
Wednesday, February 1, 2006
8:00 AM - 9:30 AM

Board Members: Brenda Buzzell, William Kirkland
Administrators: Ted Riggen, Paul Moccia, Laurie Gossens, Tommy Waltz
Community Members: Sheila Cross, Kim Canavan
Teachers: Karen Heath, Ellen Sulek, Susan O’Reagan, Sue Koch, Andrea McLaughlin, Phyllis Wiggins
Recorder: Sherrie Clark, BSU

* Reading Recovery - Laurie Gossens / Paul Moccia
Laurie Gossens did a power point presentation with data showing the number of Reading Recovery students who did not meet the standard on the Developmental Reading Assessment (DRA) in second grade. Laurie explained the meanings of some of the terms used, such as discontinued, exited, incomplete in reference to Reading Recovery. (See attachment).

Phyllis Wiggin explained the 100-word paragraph write portion of Reading Recovery. Brenda asked for an example and Phyllis passed around the sample booklets showing the difference between the levels and test samples.

The points that the committee understands thus far are:

  • Reading Recovery has proven to be an effective intervention program for the majority of first grade regular education students. Ted stated that some kids in 1st grade were reading very poorly and that they are now on target meeting the high standards in 2nd grade due to being in the Reading Recovery Program.

  • It is an expensive program serving approximately 24 first grade regular education students a year on a one –to-one basis.

  • It does not address comprehension skills.

  • It did not meet the need of 23% of the present second grade students for text and 46% on paragraph write. It was noted that the expectations are higher this year.

Brenda emphasized that the committee knows that reading intervention is needed but wants to know if can it be done in a more cost efficient manner, targeting all reading intervention needs, including comprehension. Administrators and all present agreed that this skill is one that many students often need improvement in as they progress through the grades. She further stated that intervention should be available for all regular education students who demonstrate a need all the early elementary grades. Brenda wanted to know if anyone was slipping through the cracks? Are we dong the best with our money for the children? Paul and Laurie have contacted the person at the Department of Education and will report on other available reading intervention programs at the May meeting. The committee will be able to compare these to our present program.

* Results of the Barre Town Report Card Survey
There was a 24% response from parents. It was mentioned that only 19 responded from the 5th grade parents. These were the parents who had wanted letter grades as the report card was being redesigned last year. A third quarter survey will be done encouraging those parents to respond. Early results showed that people were able to understand the new report card.

Some parents talked about their child’s report card. Sheila Cross questioned that her child had 4’s in the 1st quarter and now in the 2nd quarter had 3’s with no comments stating what had changed. She feels that teachers should be encouraged to add comments to explain that situation. Ted thought that was a good question and is looking into it. The parents would prefer to see only the quarter that is being graded; not all four quarters. Paul explained that it was the SMS system that does not allow us to change that. It was suggested that we could interview the teachers to see how they feel about the report cards now that they have been working with them. Paul said that it was possible to set up a meeting with some of them.

Paul stated that we are in the process of developing the grades 6-8 report cards. He is working with the specialists. The scheme is the same and they are field testing grades 1-5. By April they will have all the information needed for changes. They will draft up the grades 6-8 report card then.

PASS assessment will be coming up in the spring of 2007. This testing has not been done in 3 years. It will be a science assessment for grades 4 and 8.

The results of the October testing should be out sometime in early March. Paul has alerted principals to be on the lookout for those test scores. This committee will learn the results at a future meeting.

* The Garden
Barre Beautiful group was supposed to contact Paul and set up a meeting. That has not yet happened. Ellen Sulek has spoken with Bryn Mawr. Ellen has requested to speak at the February 7th faculty meeting gather teacher interest for the garden. It was noted that there is a House Bill pending for community gardens at schools. Bill stated that this is the time to get started on the indoor planting.

The next meeting will be Wednesday, March 8, 2006 in the Barre Town School 2nd Floor Conference Room from 8:00-9:30 AM.

Respectfully Submitted, Sherrie L. Clark, Barre Supervisory Union Office


Barre Town Curriculum and Teacher Support Committee Meeting
Wednesday, January 4, 2006
8:00 AM - 9:30 AM

Board Members: Brenda Buzzell, William Kirkland
Administrators: Ted Riggen, Paul Moccia, Laurie Gossens, Tommy Waltz
Community Members: Nancy Pope, Sheila Cross, Kim Canavan
Teachers: Karen Heath
Recorder: Sherrie Clark, BSU

* Reading Recovery - Laurie Gossens / Paul Moccia
The committee was provided with a follow up to the questions from the December discussion on Reading Recovery, a program that is in addition to regular classroom instruction for those regular education first grade students who need extra help in reading. We compared a cost analysis from 2002-03 to this present year. Paul explained the cost is variable each year dependent on the training of teachers for this program. The funding formula for Special Education funded by Legislation funneled through the Federal Government allows us to get some reimbursement for this program. Our net cost for 2005-06 is $66.360.00. Anticipating that twenty-four first graders are served this year; the cost is $2,765.00 per student.

Brenda said that the Curriculum group needs to be accountable to the public. Do we need to spend as much as we do per student? Is there another program that is just as effective at a lesser cost?

Nancy Pope said that out of the 24 kids, that some need very, very little help to those that need a lot of help. Some of those that need very little help could be in a group of two students. She feels that Reading Recovery is so expensive and that it is out of proportion. She feels that with full-day Kindergarten that the children should be doing better. Laurie provided the POA (Primary reading Assessment) scores from this December’s testing of the present kindergarten class. These scores were very impressive as to the high number of students meeting or exceeding the standard measured in text, letter recognition, writing vocabulary, and sentence dictation. She said that we could look at the scores at the end of the year to see if the results continue to indicate a high level of reading skills in this present full day kindergarten program. We also reviewed these same scores as a result of this year’s first and second grade classes and found that there are more children in these classes that could use extra help to meet the standard.

The committee asked for a breakdown of how many of these students not meeting the standard in first and second grade were in the Reading Recovery Program when they were first graders. This information will be provided at the February meeting. Bill Kirkland, Sheila Cross and Tommy Walz spoke on the importance of having a reading intervention program that works. Brenda stated that the committee fully supports reading intervention, but that we are looking at the results of our current program in relation to effectiveness and cost in regards to the full day kindergarten and if we should be providing intervention not only to first grade students but to other regular education students.

Ted asked if there were any other programs that serve students who need it.

Paul said that he is aware of other programs. He is not prepared to say that any other program would meet the same needs or are more cost effective. He and Laurie will research other programs and report back to the committee by the May meeting. Laurie will also bring sample books that illustrate the reading levels that the standards address. Ted feels that the higher the standard, the better the kids will do.

* AYP
Paul Moccia gave a detailed explanation on the meaning of AYP (Adequate Yearly Progress) and what it means to schools in regards to No Child Left Behind. He and Ted feel this group should be well educated about it.

Paul gave some background and data of select groups and where they were on the charts. Everyone received a handout from this presentation.

Ted wondered if the Board wanted to hear Paul’s AYP presentation before the test scores were in? It was decided that they should inform the Board with an explanation of AYP and then report on the assessment scores when they become available. The committee recognized that our school uses these scores to determine what we are doing well and how we can improve instruction.

* Results of the Barre Town Report Card Survey
This was tabled until the next meeting.

The next meeting will be Wednesday, February 1, 2006 in the Barre Town School 2nd Floor Conference Room from 8:00-9:30 AM.

Respectfully Submitted, Sherrie L. Clark, Barre Supervisory Union Office


Barre Town Curriculum and Teacher Support Committee Meeting
Wednesday, December 7, 2005
8:00 AM - 9:30 AM

Board Members: Brenda Buzzell, William Kirkland
Administrators: Ted Riggen, Paul Moccia, Laurie Gossens, Tim Crowley, Tommy Waltz
Community Members: Mark Scott, Nancy Pope, Sheila Cross, Kim Canavan,
Teachers: Karen Heath, Phyllis Wiggins, Annette Bisson-Rossi, Alan Sholk, Suzanne LeCours, Patty Young, Julie Burns, Jesse Shapiro
Recorder: Sherrie Clark, BSU

* Reading Recovery
Reading Recovery is a program that is in addition to regular classroom instruction for those regular education students who need extra help in reading. Brenda Buzzell explained that the School Board wants to know if there are other programs that are less costly and as effective as the Reading Recovery program. Paul Moccia & Laurie Gossens each did a slide presentation (handouts attached).

After the presentation, there was a very lengthy discussion. This reading intervention program is for first graders and presently has the staff, which is equivalent to one and one half teachers to serve 24 students per year. Children receive 30 minutes of individual instruction daily for 20 weeks. After the 20-week intervention, most students perform within the average range of achievement. Those still experiencing difficulty will then receive special education services

Karen Heath among others stressed the effectiveness of the program.

It was questioned as to whether full day Kindergarten will demonstrate that fewer children will need intervention in first grade? Brenda wants us to look at what’s in place now. Will we need to intervene with 24 kids next year as we now have a full day Kindergarten? Out of 93 kids in Kindergarten, whom will the teachers serve if there are not enough students requiring this intervention?

Laurie Gossens stated that there is no data yet but it will be available in January, as kindergarten students will be assessed this month. Phyllis Wiggins said that in the past if all students had been served, the Reading Recovery teachers would have been able to check–up on students that were discontinued earlier in the school year, provide small group or individual support to students that had not been served such as IEP students or students that were retained. In addition the Reading Recovery teachers have modeled lessons in the classroom for other teachers. This model had been encouraged by Marc Hall and Linda Redmond in the past. The students served in this manner are not counted in the Reading Recovery total. Since the Reading Recovery program was cut from 4 positions to 3 positions in 2003, these opportunities have not been available. During the 2004- 2005 school year the program was understaffed and a whole group of 8-10 students were not able to be served because of having one less position. These unserved students are currently in the second grade. Laurie said that they do use flexibility for Special Ed students in place of Reading Recovery above first grade.

Paul Moccia suggested that board members, teachers, parents can look on the website for data statewide. He believes that would be helpful.

Paul stated that literacy and writing results would be published in February. He feels that many schools won’t make AYP and that the margin will be very close. He feels that if the Reading Recovery program is removed, that those 24 students will end up in Special Ed services, which is more costly.

Nancy Pope asked the question - are there other programs that are more cost effective for the community? She believes the program works, but wonders if there is any other way to provide reading intervention.

There are other programs out there but the administration and staff feel that Reading Recovery is the most effective due to the extra training the teachers get which is included in the consortium cost. This program is one-on-one which they feel that is more effective for the students than two or more children in a group with one teacher. Phyllis Wiggins spoke about how the program tracks children with reports that are done at the end of each year and that the program also provides Staff Development at no extra cost that is beneficial to teachers. Phyllis explained that in addition to staff development for the Reading Recovery teachers, Susan Lynaugh also provides support to classroom teachers in grades K-2 through modeling lessons and providing workshops without an additional charge to the district.

Paul said that starting up a new program would be costly. He said that costs would be reduced by having larger groups of kids but does not know what the end result would be.

Annette Bisson-Rossi said that she would feel bad about dropping this program and that kids will be scarred. In past years, first grade teachers have had a strong group but most often there are 24 kids that need the program. Needs vary yearly.

Brenda stated this is not about dropping a program but examining it in light of the entire educational support system, which includes a full day kindergarten.

Alan Sholk said that he worked here prior to the Reading Recovery program. In pre-school, teachers do an extensive screening. They get a pretty good idea who will need services which is generally one-quarter of the class. The students have changed so much over the years; they come in Kindergarten knowing a lot of their letters and sounds. But he feels that we will need some kind of a program for those children who don’t have that knowledge when they start school. He feels that we would need to replace the program with something. He does not feel that full day Kindergarten will change the numbers of students that may benefit from the program. He wonders if it is worth it to cut one teacher from the program.

Laurie Gossens said that overall student enrollment has dropped but that special education has increased and so has the free and reduced lunch group. There are more and more kids that need special ed such as kids with autism. It was noted that Reading Recovery is not for children who require special education services but is an intervention program for children who can benefit from concentrated one to one instruction for a short period of time.

Mark Scott asked what the committees’ role is on this and wanted to know what the Board expects from this group. He thought that this committee was about effectiveness, not costs. Brenda stated that the Board is very sensitive about the cost of this program and is looking for ways to reduce the cost and while maintaining a quality reading intervention program. The taxpayers will be asking those kinds of questions.

Phyllis Wiggins invited any board member, committee member or parent to attend training or look in on a lesson when she is doing Reading Recovery.

The consensus was that this is an effective program, but to what extent can we afford it.
Brenda asked the administration to provide the following for the January meeting:

  • Actual cost of the program

  • Cost in relation to the number of children served

  • Results of the December POA (Primary Observation Assessment) scores of all present Kindergarten children

* Responsive Classroom
This item was tabled until the February meeting and will be presented in relation to the bullying issue that schools are mandated to address.

The next meeting will be Wednesday, January 4, 2006 in the Barre Town School 2nd Floor Conference Room from 8:00-9:30 AM.

Respectfully Submitted, Sherrie L. Clark, Barre Supervisory Union Office


Barre Town Curriculum and Teacher Support Committee Meeting
Wednesday, November 2, 2005
8:00 AM - 9:30 AM

Board Members: Brenda Buzzell, William Kirkland, David Harrington
Administrators: Ted Riggen, Paul Moccia, Tim Crowley, Laurie Gossens
Community Members: Mark Scott, Nancy Pope, Sheila Cross, Kim Canavan, Jeanne Daniele, co-founder of Barre Beautiful
Teachers: Deanna Bailey, Veronica Eldred, Susan Barnard
Recorder: Sherrie Clark, BSU

* Calculators & Their Classroom Use
Veronica Eldred, Grade 1 & 2 Teacher, spoke about the use of calculators in the lower grades. A handout for grades K-2 is attached. The calculator is used in her classroom as a tool to further explore the concept of numbers and to help children understand how our number system works. She passes out the calculators when they use them and puts them away at the end of the class. These calculators are shared by other teachers so they stay in one place in the classroom at all times. The question was asked, “Is the calculator ever used to replace problem solving?” Veronica stated,” No, they are not a replacement, just a supplement.” Another question was raised “Does the teacher direct the student when they need to use a calculator?” She explained that the only times students are required to use them is when the class is doing an activity or game that involves calculators. Kim Canavan and Sheila Cross spoke about their own volunteering in K-2 classrooms during math time. They saw calculators very infrequently and only when used as a tool in supplementing the exploration of concepts in the Every Day Program. Parents also commented that their children in grades 3 and 4 do not use the calculator to do their math problems at home. The parents often get out a calculator to check their children’ work and are pleased that their children are arriving at the answers correctly on their own. The consensus of the committee was that calculators are a tool used to expand concepts and are not used in these lower grades to replace students’ learning of math concepts and basic facts.

* Community Garden Project
Paul Moccia, curriculum director, attended a meeting with Barre Beautiful folks and the 4-H group. Both Bryn Mawr and Jeanne Daniele would like teachers to know that they may have access to the garden. The goal is to fully integrate this community supported project into the school’s curriculum. Jeanne Daniele has had several years experience in gardens and budgets. The garden began with community generated grant money and volunteer labor from community members, school director, Bill Kirkland, and some teachers. Paul asked the group their thoughts and suggestions. He also wanted to know “What is the Vision?” The vision is an outdoor learning center – flowers, trees habitats make it an extended classroom. Mark Scott echoed the feelings of many committee members. It is that the school will eventually use all 88 acres as an outdoor learning center, keeping in mind that our primary focus is teaching reading, writing and mathematics.

It was decided that Barre Beautiful folks will contact Paul and he will relate information to Ted Riggen. Paul will also work with Deanna Bailey, science specialist and others in the school community to determine how we can integrate the garden as an outdoor lab into the curriculum. This will be a thoughtful process aligned to the state grade level expectations and include appropriate teacher training.
Brenda reminded the committee that although the physical environment is supported through community grants, teacher time is a taxpayer expense so that as this process evolves it will need to pass through the Finance Committee.
Ted mentioned that he was going to be attending an upcoming meeting regarding composting and how that can also be implemented into the school.

* Faculty’s Response to Cost Efficiency of the Deliver of Services
The school board is asking for suggestions/recommendations on how to do this due to a very tight budget year. Dave Harrington spoke re: the board concerns. The budget vote in March is of major concern in this tight economic year. He said the board is asking” is there something more we can do in a better way to deliver our quality education at a more efficient cost. There may be a reward system for those individuals who give ideas that the board adopts to save money. There is a tri-board meeting on November 10th regarding the budget building process. All Barre Town Staff are being asked questions and they hope people are not offended; the board just needs to know where changes can be made. The question of IT support at Barre Town has been raised. Now that the initial technology is in use, how much support do we need now? They are asking this committee that we take a long, hard look to make more efficient programs. The State will play an important role as the State is going through a huge review of every department and every agency. The State Board is setting up new priorities for standards. With statewide school enrollment down, the question is “Why is the cost of school not down?” David Harrington thanked everyone for all their hard work on this committee.

* Responsive Classroom
This item was tabled until the next meeting.

The next meeting will be Wednesday, December 7, 2005 in the Barre Town School 2nd Floor Conference Room from 8:00-9:30 AM.

Respectfully Submitted, Sherrie L. Clark, Barre Supervisory Union Office


Barre Town Curriculum and Teacher-Support Committee Meeting
Wednesday, October 1
2, 2005 - 8:00 AM - 9:30 AM

Board Members: Brenda Buzzell, William Kirkland
Administrators: Ted Riggen, Paul Moccia, Tom Walz, Tim Crowley, Laurie Gossens
Community Members: Mark Scott, Nancy Pope, Sheila Cross, Kim Canavan, Bonnie George
Teachers: Deanna Bailey, Karen Heath
Recorder: Sherrie Clark, BSU

Brenda Buzzell asked for approval of the September 7, 2005 minutes. Mark Scott asked for a change in the last paragraph to read: “Mark asked for the committee to explore what interdisciplinary approaches teachers are using in their classroom.” A corrected copy will be sent to Brenda Buzzell for posting on the website.

Consensus: All agreed to the change.

* Report on the Garden and Harvest Project - Deanna Bailey
Deanna Bailey, Curriculum Science Specialist, spoke to the group on her knowledge of the Garden and Harvest Project. She met with Brynn Maher who heads up Barre Beautiful. Brynn would like someone to take charge and be a contact person so they can move forward with this project. Deanna has previous experience in these types of project through Food Works and is willing to meet with other teachers and staff to get some ideas. Ted Riggen wants to make sure that teachers/students don’t get distracted with this project and forget that reading, writing, and mathematics are the schools’ focus. Tommy Walz made the comment that the students are doing great things now with the River Project and Time Magazine and that we must acknowledge that. Mark Scott feels that the gardening project improves the students’ reading, writing and mathematics skills. Brenda made note that although this garden has been grant funded, the financial aspect of this project needs to be approved by the Finance Committee. She asked that Paul meet with the Barre Beautiful committee and coordinate their efforts through the specialists and teachers involved in the lower grades. This coordinated effort can then be reported back to the curriculum committee.

* Action Plan - Ted Riggen
Ted Riggen handed out the new 2005-06 Barre Town Action Plan. Discussion followed. The DRA (Developmental Reading Assessment) data will be reported at the next Board meeting.

* Report on the October Testing - Paul Moccia
Students in grades 3-8 are presently taking the NECAP (New England Common Assessment Program) for reading and math. Grades 5 and 8 also take a writing test. Vermont, New Hampshire and Rhode Island developed these tests to align with grade level expectations. Paul is working with the specialists for make-ups for students as all students have to take these tests Ted Riggen mentioned that Paul is doing a wonderful job in putting all this together and making it go as smoothly as possible. The students have 90 minutes to take each section of the test. The goal is to have all tests done by October 24th. Results will not be in until February. They will be available to the public.

* Report Cards - Paul Moccia
Paul gave a brief history on the report card issues. All report cards are being aligned to grade level expectations with the standards for each academic area listed for the grade level. Teachers assign a number that reflects how the student is progressing towards each standard. They are in the process of being edited per input from teachers/staff. Paul handed out grades 1-5 report cards for the group to review. He asked that everyone view these as “parents” to see if information is reported in a consistent and understandable manner. Please have comments/suggestions back by Friday, October 14, 2005. Some changes cannot be made until June 2006 due to the way the computer system is set up. There was discussion concerning establishing a parent review committee after the first quarter report card has gone out.

* Budget Building as it Relates to Curriculum - Brenda Buzzell
Brenda stated that the Finance Committee would review all finances pertaining to curriculum. The Board is conscious of the present economy and has asked the administration and teachers to devise ways to deliver programs and services in a more cost efficient manner.

The next meeting will be Wednesday, November 2, 2005 in the Barre Town School 2nd Floor Conference Room from 8:00-9:30 AM.

Respectfully Submitted, Sherrie L. Clark, Barre Supervisory Union Office

 


CORRECTED MINUTES
Barre Town Curriculum and Teacher-Support Committee Meeting
Wednesday, September 7, 2005 * 8:00 AM - 9:30 AM

Board Members: Brenda Buzzell, William Kirkland
Administrators: Ted Riggen, Paul Moccia, Tom Walz, Tim Crowley, Laurie Gossens
Community Members: Mark Scott, Nancy Pope, Sheila Cross, Kim Canavan, Bonnie George
Teachers: Deanna Bailey, Karen Heath, Beth Hulbert,
Recorder: Sherrie Clark, BSU

Brenda Buzzell asked for approval of the change of the meeting time from 8:30 - 10:00 AM to 8:00 - 9:30 AM.

Consensus: All agreed to the new time change.

The new title for this group will be Barre Town Curriculum & Teacher Support Committee (per David Harrington and the restructuring of committees). Efforts of this group will focus on curriculum and teacher support.

* Welcome & Introductions
Everyone re-introduced themselves and gave a brief background on what they do. Paul Moccia, the new Curriculum Director was welcomed and gave the members a synopsis of his teaching and administrative experience.

* Update on All Day Kindergarten - Laurie Gossens
There are 94 students and 7 teachers. Three classes have 14 students and four classes have 13 students. During opening week, there were two half day open houses and those went well. There are only a few students who take advantage of the breakfast. If more do so in the future, they will eat in the lunch room instead of the classroom. The kindergarten lunch is 40-45 minutes and teachers are present with their classes during this time. At recess there was only one glitch -- there was a 5-minute overlap with the 4th grade. To rectify this, the 4th grade was shifted to the back of the building. All equipment and supplies that were ordered over the summer are ready in the classrooms. The new teachers have been creative and set up their rooms well. Para Ed support has been reduced to one para, who helps with assessment for all 94 students. Other duties included recess and some clerical support. For staff development, the Kindergarten teachers will work with the Barre City group focusing on math and problem-solving tasks. The two new teachers will be trained in the POA (Primary Observation Assessment).

* Curriculum Specialists Goals:
Each specialist (Deanna Bailey, Science; Beth Hulbert, Math & Karen Heath, English Language Arts) spoke about her background experience and goals for this school year.

Deanna will be working to align our seventh and eighth grade curriculum to the state standards. This includes aligning our assessment with the State Cluster of Science Expectations and outline what is specifically taught at each grade level. Deanna will also continue to do discovery workshops to model inquiry based science methods. .

Beth spoke about the increased demands of the Tri State Grade level Expectations. She stated that the kindergarten teachers could now fully implement the math program in the full day program. Teachers in grades one and two can follow up and build on what is introduced in kindergarten. Grades one through six will continue to work on problem solving skills. She is planning to try parent workshops in the fifth grade and host a Family Math Night. More details will follow. She has also solicited input from the high school teachers as to what they see is lacking as our children transition to high school.

Karen ‘s focus will be on grammar, usage and mechanics. She hopes to create a document that insures that all teachers are consistent with expectations at grade levels.

* Tour of the Kindergarten Classrooms
Laurie Gossens gave a tour of the Kindergarten classrooms.

Brenda remarked that people had asked about the new curriculum booklet published by the Secretary of State’s office to teach about Vermont. It is called, “Vermont History, Facts and Fun” and will be available free to all schools teaching Vermont history. We will look into getting a copy to all teachers.

Nancy asked about this year’s Action Plan. Tim stated that it would be available for review at the next meeting.

Mark asked for the committee to explore what interdisciplinary approaches teachers are using in their classroom. The committee will also continue to examine the methods of assessment/report cards. Paul will get copies of a case study on standards and assessment to all. Members should read this before the next metering.

The next meeting will be Wednesday, October 12, 2005 in the Barre Town School 2nd Floor Conference Room from 8:00-9:30 AM.

*NOTE: The change for next month’s meeting -- it will be the second Wednesday for October ONLY.

Respectfully Submitted, Sherrie L. Clark, Barre Supervisory Union Office


Barre Town Curriculum Committee Meeting - Wednesday, June 8, 2005 - 8:30 AM – 10:00

Board Members: Brenda Buzzell
Administrators: Ted Riggen, John Tapper, Tom Walz, Tim Crowley, Dorothy Anderson, Laurie Gossens
Community Members: Suzanne LeCours, Mark Scott, Debbie Plante, Nancy Vaillancourt, Cathy Frey, Louise O’Connor, John Sell, Wendy Sell, Debbie Goulet, Sheila Bailey, Sheila Cross
Teachers: Glenda Allen, Dianna Landry, Peg Lawson, Marge Brusetti, Priscilla Clark, Susie Klinefelter
Recorder: Sherrie Clark, BSU

Brenda Buzzell asked for approval of the May 1, 2005 & June 1, 2005 Joint Curriculum meeting minutes. Approved unanimously.

* Class Size Discussion - Teacher Placement Next Year
At the June 1 School Board meeting, the board members asked the administration to present solutions within the present budget to the curriculum committee in regards to the high numbers of children in the 5th grade. The administration had planned for four classes based upon the class ratios set 10-12 years ago by previous boards. John listed these five solutions:

  • Keep the plan as laid out previously with very high numbers in the 5th grade.

  • Hire an additional teacher - there is no money in the budget for that and it causes space problems.

  • Hire one or two paras to help out in the classroom (due to larger size) - it is felt that this is just
    a band-aid and would not totally solve the problem.

  • Could create two multi-age 4/5 classrooms. Not a realistic option – these grades begin school at different times and no teacher has mentioned teaching a multi- age group..

  • Moving a teacher from 4th to 5th grade – this would create classes of similar size in 4th and 5th grades.

There was discussion about these possibilities with all agreeing that class sizes of 20-21 students were preferred over 24-25 students.

Consensus:

  • Hire another teacher for 5th grade, which would create 5 classrooms of approximately 20 students.

  • Move a 4th grade teacher to 5th grade – this will result in similar class sizes in 4th and 5th grade. The present 3rd grade has 5 classes with these numbers of students and it was originally proposed, based on past board ratios, to increase 4th grade to 6 teachers. This solution of moving a teacher from 4th to 5th will maintain the status quo in relation to the number of classrooms in each grade.

It was noted that the Board will be discussing and setting new teacher/student ratios with the 2006-07 budget.

* Curriculum Wrap-Up / Action Plan Report
John Tapper provided all with a written report of his 2004-05 Action Plan. This included activities already in progress and completed, along with recommendations for the next curriculum specialist. He also showed a draft of the 2005-06 Staff Development Plan. John met with the Curriculum Specialists and talked about what should be the focus. This includes classroom management practices and trainings by the Math, Science and Language Specialists among other topics.

There was discussion on the proper use of calculators. John supplied all with a booklet concerning calculator use. He spoke with Beth Hulbert and feels that calculators are used in approved and appropriate ways. They are not meant to replace a student’s knowledge of basic facts and concepts. Beth will continue to make sure this is happening.

* Future Goals
Tim Crowley spoke about an after school program for children. He and a parent looking into having this sponsored by the community and partnered with the school. Interest has been expressed by the parents. Tim thought maybe Beth Hulbert could be involved in this.

Laurie Gossens gave a summary of what is in place for the full year year kindergarten program, which will begin this fall. She explained that as two present Reading Recovery teachers will become full time Kindergarten teachers, they would be training two existing teachers in Reading Recovery.

John Tapper was thanked for all his efforts and good work and told he would be greatly missed.

The next meeting will be Wednesday, September 7, 2005 at 8:30 in the Barre Town School 2nd Floor Conference Room from 8:30-10:00 AM.

Respectfully Submitted, Sherrie L. Clark, Barre Supervisory Union Office


Barre Town Joint Curriculum Committee Meeting - Wednesday, June 1, 2005, 5:00 - 6:15 PM

Board Members: Brenda Buzzell, Jeff Gagne, Kerri Lamb
Administrators: Ted Riggen, John Tapper, Tom Walz, Tim Crowley, Laurie Gossens
Community Members: Suzanne LeCours, Sheila Cross, Nancy Pope, Maria Conti-Reilly
Recorder: Sherrie Clark, BSU

Brenda called the meeting to order at 5:15 PM following a lite dinner that was available to the members.

* Determine what technology is available to children in K – Grade 8.
Below is a list of the technology that is being used in the classrooms

  1. Internet Access

  2. Network resources - programs, kids save documents

  3. Computers - 1 or 2 network computers per classroom

  4. 2 stationary labs (1 upstairs, 1 downstairs - 24 computers in each)

  5. 2 mobile labs - (24 computers per lab)

  6. Laser Printers - these are strategically placed throughout the schools. (It averages 1 per 3-4 classrooms). There are inkjet printers and lasers in the lab.

  7. Computers in the Library - there are 6 student workstations, 2-3 for staff

  8. LCD Projectors - 1 for each mobile lab

  9. Digital cameras - these are signed out when needed. They are kept in a central location. There is one per every grade.

  10. Scanners - 2

  11. Graphing calculators and other calculators - large supply of these

  12. Laptop computers - 4-6 for student use

  13. Alpha Smarts - 6 for students (mini keyboards)

  14. Chat PC’s - handheld systems that have pictures that can be coded for voice output. Can put in sentences, questions

  15. DynaRite - fancier than Alpha Smart, has voice output as well

  16. Touch Screen laptop - used for individual students but can be tested out by other students

  17. 2 microscopes are used to project - all classes have access to them. They are used in K-2 science classes

* Discuss Grade Expectations and how they are being met and Determine expectations for teachers’ use of technology in K – Grade 8
There was discussion about the determination of which grade should be using what technology. Tommy explained that he, John Tapper, some teachers, and others formed a group and looked at the State grade expectations mandated by the State. They decided it made sense to use the standards mandated by the State. He handed out an Integrated Technology Projects sheet showing what each grade is expected to use for technology.

Question: Why go backwards?

-Cost savings - old expectations we had were much heavier laden than those of the State.
-Most kids come with knowledge -- it superceded what we had in curriculum.

Keyboarding Question: Is it supervised? Shouldn’t it be?

Keyboarding needs to be a concerted effort at a particular grade level so they can use it every day. The Technology group decided on 3rd grade as having students know the keyboard. They feel that the teachers are supervising it but how closely is the question. John Tapper will speak with teachers and get answers on that.

Laurie Gossens stated that she feels it is not developmentally appropriate for Third graders to be starting keyboarding skills. This group is also learning cursive. The State expectations put keyboarding at grades 3-4. John Tapper stated that we want to get the kids started as early as possible. Others felt that these children should be supervised while practicing so that they are applying the correct posture and techniques so that they will not cause injury to their wrists. The consensus was to try it at the 3rd grade level and see what happens. They will be able to practice the keyboard for 15 -20 minutes per day.

Jeff asked about the use of calculators in first grade. John explained that should be used to reinforce students’ work and help with complex mathematical problem solving. Students are not allowed to use these to take the place of learning basic math skills appropriate to this grade level. John will address this issue with teachers.

Meeting adjourned at 6:20 p.m.

Respectfully Submitted, Sherrie L. Clark, Barre Supervisory Union Office


Barre Town Curriculum Committee Meeting - Wednesday, May 1, 2005, 8:30 AM – 10:00

Board Members: Brenda Buzzell, Bill Kirkland
Administrators: Ted Riggen, John Tapper, Tom Walz, Tim Crowley, Dorothy Anderson, Pat Fitzsimmons, Beth Hulbert (Curriculum Specialists)
Community Members: Bonnie George, Kim Canavan, Suzanne LeCours
Recorder: Sherrie Clark, BSU

Brenda Buzzell asked for approval of the April meeting minutes. Approved unanimously.

* Discussion of Curriculum Director Position
Marcia Biondolillo, curriculum chair from Barre City was unable to attend the meeting. As we share this position and the curriculum specialists with Barre City, she gave input to Brenda re: the above position: Marcia’s committee feels that the Curriculum Director position is important by itself and that it should not involve all the other duties that John Tapper has been doing in the past; grantwriting, CFP funding, overseeing Para Task Force. This position should concentrate on the coordination of the curriculum specialists and be more involved in the schools. This is what the position was originally slated to do. The extra duties that this position has been doing need to be done by other people.

John Tapper spoke about how busy the position is; that it is not “doable” by one person. The grantwriting piece brings in lots of federal and state dollars and cannot be overlooked. Dorothy spoke of the “history” of the positions at BSU. The Special Services Director used to do the grantwriting and some HR functions but when that position was not filled a lot of those duties fell on to the Curriculum Director. The Special Services Director position is still budgeted for. BSU tried to fill this position as an HR/Grantwriter position but the Board did not approve it. When John Tapper gave notice that he was leaving, Dorothy then thought that his position and the open Special Services Director position could be combined as one salary in order to save money and title it as Assistant Superintendent. The SU Board requested that each board should hold discussion on these positions. There are now, in fact two open positions in the BSU office and both of them need to be filled. Discussion ensued about these positions. The committee reviewed the grade expectations and assessment in regards to No Child Left Behind and the Tri-State Standards. It was also noted that due to many retirements, we would have new teachers unfamiliar with our school’s curriculum, instruction and assessment procedures.

Consensus: Maintain the Director of Curriculum Director position we currently have and have it focus on Curriculum Instruction & Assessment, not a catch-all position. This person would be at the schools more.

It was also the consensus that the curriculum specialists are extremely valuable. They are able to model procedures and provide support for classroom teachers in math, science and language. They also help to coordinate the curriculum between the grade levels and schools, aligning it to the grade expectations.

* Joint Meeting with Tech Committee
There will be a joint meeting re: Technology & Curriculum on Wednesday, June 1 in the Barre Town Library from 5:15 - 6:15. A light dinner of Chicken Caesar Salad will be served at 5:00 p.m.

* Math & Science Specialists
Beth Hulbert spoke about the technology she has been using in teaching her Math students. She reports that she has accomplished quite a lot. She has shown students how to use websites and has saved the best ones under the “favorites” list. She has held trainings using the mobile lab. The teachers are now using it without her help. She taught an on-line course last year about fractions. She also created resource books for every teacher relating directly to math. Beth will be happy to bring the mobile lab and kids to the next board meeting to demonstrate what is being taught.

Consensus: Have Beth bring the mobile lab unit and kids to the next board meeting for a demonstration
Pat Fitzsimmons spoke about what she has done and handed out Grade Expectation samples. She is working on the Pre-K - 6 grade expectations as they relate to the state and vs. the U61 expectations. There is much more work to be done on these and Pat fears with the shortage of Staff Development Days for next year that they will not be finished. If anyone wants a CD on the work she has been doing, please let John Tapper know and you will be sent one.

The next meeting will be Wednesday, June 1, 2005 at 8:30 in the Barre Town School 2nd Floor Conference Room from 8:30-10:00 AM.

Respectfully Submitted, Sherrie L. Clark, Barre Supervisory Union Office


Barre Town Curriculum Committee Meeting, Wednesday, April 6, 2005, 8:30 AM – 10:00

Board Members: Brenda Buzzell
Administrators: Ted Riggen, John Tapper, Tom Walz
Community Members: Nancy Pope, Kim Canavan, Suzanne LeCours
Recorder: Sherrie Clark, BSU

Brenda Buzzell asked for approval of the March meeting minutes. Approved unanimously.

* Grade Expectations
John Tapper handed out the grade expectations printed from the State Department of Education website. Vermont collaborated with New Hampshire and Rhode Island to develop these expectations. He went through the reading, writing and math sections and explained what the teacher leaders were doing with this information and how it relates to the report cards, which are aligned to the grade expectations.

* Update on Math Program
Some grouping was done in the 7th & 8th grade levels to challenge higher end students. They are working on investigations and problem solving. The idea was to use the ILN (interactive learning network) between Barre Town and SHS schools but it has not yet happened because we are waiting for answers from the Department of Education. There was some discussion on what these students are getting prior to arriving at the high school. There was also discussion on the honors class being started in January. If a student waits until then and in the meantime does not have math, they must be able to stay in that class because there are no other options. It was suggested that we should follow up with more information from the middle school and high school math teachers.

* Joint Meeting with Tech Committee
Discussion around what time this should happen. It was decided that this committee would go to the Tech committee meeting just prior to the Board meeting on May 18th. Brenda will set this up with them. Ted recommended asking Kerri what she would like the agenda to include.

* Help With Hiring ELA Curriculum Specialist
It was decided that John Tapper would attend tonight’s Board meeting and explain the reasons and funding for this position.

* Update on Health Committee Work
The Health Committee has identified Health Expectations in Kindergarten through Grade 8. They have identified areas in the curriculum that are teaching health expectations and areas that need more coverage. Our nutrition policy and wellness activities set us as leaders among other Vermont schools.

The next meeting will be Wednesday, May 4, 2005 at 8:30 in the Barre Town School 2nd Floor Conference Room from 8:30-10:00 AM.

Respectfully Submitted, Sherrie L. Clark, Barre Supervisory Union Office


Barre Town Curriculum Committee Meeting, Wednesday, March 2, 2005, 8:30 AM – 10:00

Board Members: Brenda Buzzell

Administrators: Ted Riggen, John Tapper, Tom Walz, Laurie Gossens

Community Members: Nancy Pope, Kim Canavan, Bonnie George, Suzanne LeCours

Recorder: Sherrie Clark, BSU

Brenda Buzzell asked for approval of the February meeting minutes. One change to paragraph 7 should read “Keyboarding should be a part of…” instead of “Keyboarding could be a part of…” .

* Results on Budget Vote -
- The voting results were discussed at great length
- Brenda asked the group what ideas they had in order to get the budgets passed.
- Ideas discussed included better public relations, such as opening the school to community members for monthly program explanations. These could include guided nature walks on our trails, demonstration in the computer lab, more details on the proposed kindergarten option, etc. There was also discussion on more cost efficient ways to deliver reading intervention.
The consensus was to put the budget back out with modest cuts but to put a separate line item asking for voter approval of expanded optional full day kindergarten. The majority of the committee supports the concept of the optional full day kindergarten program and the idea of making All Day Kindergarten a separate line item.

* John Tapper asked the committee for their support / ideas regarding hiring a Language Arts Specialist. This position is currently contracted out and would be funded through the Consolidated School Grant that we now use to pay the consultants. The salary for this specialist would have no impact on the budget and in future years could be funded in the same manner that the Math and Science specialists are paid – through the federal grant.
The consensus was yes, the committee supports John on hiring a Language Arts Specialist.

* John Tapper also asked the committee for their support on having a 3-day orientation/training for all new hires before the start of the school year. We currently require new hires to complete a half day unpaid training, He suggested that they could be paid a stipend, a summer wage, or each could receive continuing education credit for the training.
The consensus was yes, the committee would support this orientation/training. However, they felt that the finance committee should decide upon the amount, if any, of payment for this training.

Next meeting will be Wednesday, April 6, 2005 at 8:30 in the Barre Town School 2nd Floor Conference Room from 8:30-10:00 AM.

Respectfully Submitted
Sherrie L. Clark, Barre Supervisory Union Office


Barre Town Curriculum Committee Meeting Wednesday, February 2, 2005, 8:30 AM – 10:00

Board Members: Brenda Buzzell, Sheila Cross
Administrators: Ted Riggen, John Tapper, Tom Walz
Community and Parents: Nancy Pope, Kim Canavan, Bonnie George
Recorder: Sherrie Clark, BSU

Brenda Buzzell asked for approval of the January meeting minutes. No changes or additions made. The minutes will be posted on the website.

The Committee reviewed the Curriculum & Instruction Policy, which will be presented to the Board for first reading. It was noted that the committee had not seen the whole document. The second page was missing from the original policy. Minor wording changes were discussed. It will to go back to the Policy Committee for review.

Full Day Kindergarten:
This item has been tabled until the next meeting, pending the budget vote at the town meeting.

Technology Proposal (David Harrington):
Discussion -- re: how to provide professional development and what should we be doing with computers? Comfort level working with computers is different at each grade level. The committee agreed that all teachers should be proficient in the use of computers for their grade level and held accountable for this.

Suggestions:
John Tapper stated that teachers in grades 5-8 already schedule the mobile lab for their classes to work on projects. He feels that a timeline of one year is realistic for all teachers (K-8) to plan projects that incorporate technology into grade level expectations.

Keyboarding should be a part of the technology project incorporated into the fourth grade.
Children should learn keyboarding at an early age -- should be learned by 3rd & 4th grade level for state standard.
Maybe use 15 minutes per day for keyboarding for one whole semester.
Tom Walz will present these suggestions to the Technology Committee.

Whole Child:
Brenda Buzzell stated that the website mentioned at the last meeting was from a project in Florida. This recognized the same qualities that organizations in VT note as important for the development of the whole child. The committee’s concern is specific as to how our school addresses teaching each child? Each child has different learning abilities and learning styles. Are there things we aren’t doing? It was noted that children remember activities, building relationships, skills learned, a great class trip. Some parents think school is too geared toward assessing and testing. What happened to outdoor activities? Children need more exploration of the outside.
Ted Riggen stated that years ago there was a volunteer group of parents who coordinated after school activities using our grounds and facility. It was suggested that an after school program be put in place using a grant to pay for a coordinator to recruit volunteers and pay for any resources needed. Brenda Buzzell noted that the State Child Development Division and Children’s Trust Fund has grants available for this purpose. John Tapper will look into this possibility.

Review of NSRE Math Scores:
John Tapper handed out the BTMES 2003/2004 fourth and eighth grade standard scores. The trends were discussed. Our school adopted “Everyday Math.” Beth Hulbert, math specialist, is researching ways to improve these statistics. She is working with the teachers to develop problem-solving skills. Nancy Pope questioned how we are challenging children who are meeting the standard with honors. The committee will explore this issue at future meetings.

John Tapper handed out the Grade Expectations for Vermont’s Framework of Standards and Learning Opportunities for the Committee to look over for discussion at the next meeting.

Next meeting will be Wednesday, March 2, 2005 at 8:30 in the Barre Town School 2nd Floor Conference Room from 8:30-10:00 AM.

Respectfully Submitted,  Sherrie L. Clark, Barre Supervisory Union Office


Barre Town Curriculum Committee Meeting Wednesday, January 5, 2005

Board Members: Brenda Buzzell, Sheila Cross, Chris Conti

Administrators: Ted Riggens, Tim Crowley, Laurie Gossens, John Tapper, Tom Walz

Parents: Suzanne LeCours, Mark Scott, Maria Conti-Reilly, Nancy Pope, Kim Canavan, Bonnie George

Recorder: Sherrie Clark, BSU

 

Brenda Buzzell opened the meeting with everyone introducing themselves. She asked for approval of the December meeting minutes. No changes or additions made. The minutes will be posted on the website.

 

All Day Kindergarten:

This committee had sent a resolution to the Board following the June, 2004 meeting recommending an optional full day kindergarten program be established. This program has been included in the budget and this was now discussed at length with pros and cons -

 

John Tapper explained that this is an optional program. He believes this program can do more for the child. Most schools in the area are already offering a full day kindergarten. Children are expected to know more by 1st grade, as there are now higher standards that must be met. Teachers feel rushed with the current program and are always playing catch-up.

Laurie Gossens shared two handouts. These were the Cost of Full-Day Kindergarten and What’s New? (not only pertaining to kindergarten). The bottom line for start up for the full day program stated $175,741 but has since been lowered to $150,000.

 

Discussion ensued regarding costs. Will it double in a year or two? Brenda stated that the finance committee has looked at maintenance costs and that there are items that will help with this cost. These include savings in transportation and collaborations with private preschool providers to realize more ADM (Average Daily Membership) monies. Tom stated that kindergarten appeared to be more cost effective than other alternatives.

Questions asked:

  • What is the problem we’re trying to solve?

  • Is this the only solution to the problem if there is one?

  • Can we be more creative?

  • Why full-day kindergarten?

  • Does this come from the State standards or are we just providing childcare?

  • Are schools putting too much pressure on kids?

  • Budget costs? Do we want to put $150,000 into this program or something else?

  • If this program is voted in, will something have to be cut from the budget down the road?

Much discussion followed which included offering programs to parents, trying to increase volunteerism in classrooms, and other creative methods in the structure of the day for k-grade.

Some Answers:

  • This didn’t come up as a “problem” to begin with. Was a suggestion -- other schools are doing it and the legislature introduced S-166 last session which if passed would have encouraged schools to offer the program or risk losing a percentage of the ADM monies.

  • If the State funding comes through, down the road, some of the monies will come from there to fund the kindergarten.

  • Teachers and children won’t feel so rushed to meet expectations especially in math and science.

  • Some students will be full day; others will choose half day.

  • Would eliminate 2 year Kindergarten, however this year’s 2-year class would be grandfathered in and receive the second year of Kindergarten next year.

  • Evidence shows that a full day program benefits children on free and reduced lunch.

  • Young children need to have time to learn by repetition.

  • Full day program has proven to build a strong foundation, which may eliminate intervention and remediation in the later grades.

The next meeting will focus on educating the whole child. John asked members to check the website,
www.wholechildproject.org

Next meeting will be Wednesday, February 2, 2005 at 8:30 in the Barre Town School 2nd Floor Conference Room from 8:30-10:00 AM.

 

Respectfully Submitted,  Sherrie L. Clark, Barre Supervisory Union Office


 

BARRE TOWN CURRICULUM COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES - December 1, 2004

The Barre Town Curriculum Committee met on December 1, 2004, at 8:30 a.m. in the second floor conference room at Barre Town Middle and Elementary School. School Board Committee Members Attending: Brenda Buzzell, Chair; and Sheila Cross. Community Committee Members Attending: Suzanne LeCours, Mark Scott, and Bonnie George. Administrators Attending: John Tapper, Ted Riggen, Tim Crowley, Laurie Gossens, and Tom Walz.

Approval of Minutes
A brief discussion on the benefits of an optional full day kindergarten ensued. John will summarize the process, which led to including this option in the budget at the School Board meeting tonight. Lyman Amsden will be attending the meeting and will bring information to share as to the positive results of a full day kindergarten program in Burlington schools. Brenda handed out a report “The Need for High Quality Child Care is Undisputable”, which was prepared by Donny Osman of the Central VT Early Childhood Council. This highlights the growth of the child care industry and the impact on our children.

The committee approved the changes in wording to the curriculum and instruction policy. 5.J. to read”…community service learning opportunities with the proposed curriculum…” and adding 5.K.”maintaining a balanced school experience that will benefit the whole child.” Ted noted that we had agreed to adding “…and grade level expectations…” to 5.B. at the last meeting. Sheila will bring these changes to the policy committee meeting. The minutes from November 3 were approved and Brenda will forward them to Teija to be posted on the Barre Town website.

Report of Report Cards
John acknowledged that people had concerns and comments on the new report card. He gave a wonderful power point presentation on the development and rationale for the new report card for K-grade 10. He explained that the NECAP testing is yearly and that parents need to know quarterly where their child is in regards to the standards. This long-term strategic plan is designed to give information to parents and teachers as to where children are succeeding in meeting the standards and to where our school needs to put more emphasis. The card is aligned with grade level expectations and a child is assessed on these expectations. This allows for each teacher within a grade level to be consistent in the assessment of children. The committee examined a new report card and learned how the number system and letter grade correlated. There was discussion on where letter grades would begin. The administration feels that developmentally a fifth grader fits in an intermediate level with grades 3 and 4. Thus they would receive a number to correlate with each the grade level expectation and grades 6-10 would receive the additional letter grade for the subject area. Suzanne mentioned that some parents felt fifth grade was the “guinea pig” for this new card. John explained that this class was chosen as their original report card was unique from any other grade and that both the Town and City were using a different report card for 5th grade. Thus this seemed the logical grade to begin using the new report card. He further mentioned that all children on an IEP would have this new report card aligned specific to their individual grade level expectation in each area. Laurie commented that this would follow their IEP and make reporting consistent for children.

NAEYC Accreditation and the Cost of Collaboration with Local Providers
Laurie explained the NAEYC accreditation process that Barre Town and Barre City Preschools are using their professional development days for. This is the accreditation from the National Association for the Education of Young Children. Two local licensed centers, New Leaf of Washington County Mental Health and St. Monica Preschool are joining us in this process. Brenda mentioned that the Child Care Support Services of the Family Center of Washington County had invited all interested area licensed providers to enter this accreditation process with us. This very detailed and lengthy process has been completed by other schools and licensed centers throughout the state and allows for collaboration with child care providers and schools to insure a quality preschool experience as children prepare for kindergarten. It will also allow for our school to benefit from ADM monies from Barre Town children enrolled in a private preschool program that we collaborate with. There are VT schools already in these partnerships. Laurie stated that our district should complete the accreditation process in 2006 and it will then take a couple more years to realize the ADM monies.

What does it mean to educate the “whole Child”?
The group began a discussion on what is means to educate the “whole child” and will continue this at our next meeting. Members were asked to think about their definition of the “whole child” and how we address this at our school. It was mentioned that we should examine developmental factors and how children learn in relation to our educational program.

The next meeting will be held on Wednesday, January 5, 2005 from 8:30-10:00 a.m. in the upstairs conference room at BTMES.


BARRE TOWN CURRICULUM COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES - NOVEMBER 3, 2004

The Barre Town Curriculum Committee met on November 3, 2004, at 8:30 a.m. in the second floor conference room at Barre Town Middle and Elementary School. School Board Committee Members Attending: Brenda Buzzell, Chair; and Sheila Cross. Community Committee Members Attending: Suzanne LeCours, Mark Scott, Bonnie George, and Kim Canavan. Administrators Attending: John Tapper, Ted Riggen, and Tim Crowley.

Curriculum and Instruction Policy Revision
The committee read over and discussed the following changes to the policy: changing 5.B. to read “. . . Vermont Framework of Standards and Learning Opportunities and grade level expectations as recognized . . .”. Brenda Buzzell asked John Tapper to work on wording to include the “whole child.” She also asked Mark Scott and the other members to look at the wording. Discussion items on the policy revision included inclusion of early learning expectations and grade level expectations.

Examine and Determine Relevance of the 11 Essential Questions
Tim Crowley informed the group that there were actually fifteen questions, but started out as eleven. Brenda Buzzell noted that Nancy Pope was sorry she was unable to attend the meeting, as she was instrumental in working on the questions from the beginning. Ted Riggen said the questions came about as a request from the board. Discussion followed on each question. On question 4, John Tapper indicated staff development has been looked at during the past year and the district is offering 32 classes, some for college credit, building-wide. Offering school year staff development is more effective than before school begins or after the student year. Brenda Buzzell stated she does not feel that late start days are academically beneficial. On question 6, Tim Crowley highlighted the Cast-a-Spell program to enhance students having difficulty spelling. Best practices (question 7) are being used for report cards now. Community service (question 14) was included because it was felt that community service was an important part of school life. Tim Crowley indicated it began with a grant and Barre Town was determined to make it part of Barre Town School's learning opportunities. Mark Scott said all kids should experience community service learning at least once.

The committee agreed that these were valuable questions for our members to be aware of and to use when discussing curriculum.

Report Cards (5th Grade)
John Tapper indicated that based on the difficulties of combining the two schools' fifth grade report cards this year, the fifth graders will be receiving a progress report instead of a report card. He passed out the proposed report card to attendees. This report card will be based on the standards. Previously, Barre City and Barre Town fifth grade report cards were entirely different. On November 30, everyone will get together to review the proposed report. It has yet to be determined whether or not fifth graders should receive letter grades. Discussion followed on letter grades, 1-4 number grades, or both. It was decided to continue this discussion at the next meeting.

Other
Ted Riggen brought up the suggestion that had been made that committee reports be published on the Barre Town website. Mark Scott pointed out the he thought the committee needed to review them prior to posting on the website. Discussion ensued on the minutes of the last meeting. Mark stated he had brought up the need to encourage the science program to include activities utilizing the vast outdoor opportunities available at Barre Town; i.e., learning about real ecosystems outdoors rather than just reading about them. Brenda Buzzell said the minutes should be amended to reflect Mark's comments at the last meeting, be re-distributed to committee members for approval and then forwarded to TeIja Huttunen-Green for posting on the website. Brenda Buzzell was commended for her reports at the school board meetings to inform people about what was going on at the committee level. It was decided that approval of minutes should appear first on the next agenda.

Meeting adjourned at 10:10 a.m.

The next meeting will be held on Wednesday, December 1, from 8:30-10:00 a.m. in the upstairs conference at BTMES.


BARRE TOWN CURRICULUM COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES - OCTOBER 6, 2004

The BTMES Curriculum Committee met on October 6, 2004 at 8:30 AM in the upstairs conference room of the school. Those in attendance included, School Board members-Brenda Buzzell (committee chair) and Sheila Cross; School Administrators-Tim Crowley, Ted Riggen, John Tapper, Tom Waltz; community members-Suzanne LeCours, Mark Scott, and Kim Canavan. Guest was Pat Fitzimmons, Science Curriculum Specialist.

- Review of the committee charge:  We reviewed the 1998 Curriculum and Instruction Policy. There was feeling that the Policy Committee might want to revisit this policy and let us know if it needs to be rewritten. Sheila will bring this to the attention of the Policy Committee.

John gave the committee information on the upcoming NECAP Assessments and how this fits into a bigger plan.

Tim reminded the committee that a guiding document for the committee is The Eleven Essential Questions. There was interest in revisiting this document to see if it would be useful for us. Tim will bring this to the next meeting.

- Reaction to the Action Plan:  There were questions about the evaluation portion of the plan. Tim explained how teachers are chosen for evaluation. Brenda had a question about our collaboration w/local agencies on drug and alcohol prevention. This led us to a discussion about how this kind of information goes to kids. Tim told us that grade 6, 7, and 8 get this as part of the family and consumer science curriculum. The committee approved the Action Plan as presented.

- Pat Fitzimmons gave us a wonderful presentation as to what is happening in the K-6 science program. The committee learned about the many ways that our children are using an inquiry based science program. We also reviewed the PASS assessment scores that show our children have improved from 51% of students achieving the standard in 2003 to 60% achieving the standard in 2004. This is 14% above the state average score. (Please see Pat's handouts for more information)

Mark raised concerns that the science curriculum address natural resources in particular to using our land at BTMES. Although this is being done somewhat, the committee agreed that this should be a priority.

- Report Cards: John explained report card developments. We will examine the 5th Grade report card at our next meeting, as this card will be the first one that is aligned to grade level expectations.

The next meeting will be Wednesday, November 3 from 8:30-10:00AM in the upstairs conference room of the school.

John Tapper, Director of Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment, Barre Supervisory Union, Barre, Vermont .